×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

(OP)
So this is somewhat a theoretical question. A new proposed building 330'x200', 3 stories, in schematic design. Nearly half the borings show that the building will be OK @ shallow footings, while the west half has either to be excavated and refilled, comapacted to 8' or we can go to deep foundations.

The arch asked me if it was OK to have half the building on shallow ftgs and half on H piles. My response was that there will be significant differntial settlement since piles are somewhat rigid support compared to footings which will settle. Any thoughts?

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

Go to all pile or make two structures.  Don't mix it.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

I agree with Mike.   

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

JoeBaseplate,

Quote:

My response was that there will be significant differntial settlement since piles are somewhat rigid support compared to footings which will settle.
You are absolutely right.  Use one or the other but not both.

BA

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

Generally I'd agree with Mike and Lion above but I once had the exact condition and we mixed them.

What we did was use drilled concrete piers on one half (soft, expansive clays with shale about 30 feet deep) and on the other half used spread footings.

Now we knew that the spread footings would tend to have more settlement than the deeper, "fixed" piers so as the spread footings got closer to the piers, we started diminishing the allowable soil pressure....i.e. using larger and larger spread footings...until we got to the fault line where the footing type changed to piers and suspended grade beams.

At that point we added a building expansion joint as near to the fault line as possible.

This was in 1985 or so - no problems since.

 

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

I agree with the others, but in some cases, it's not that simple.  If the bearing strata is rock, then a combination of footings in the high rock and piles in the lower rock can be a satisfactory solution.  Conversely, if part of the building bears on natural ground and part on engineered fill, there can still be differential settlement issues.   

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

Agree with JAE and hokie, in certain situations this is feasible.

Firstly, I would discuss this in detail with the geotech (if there is not one then get one!).

If you are bearing on the same strata with similar bearing stresses then you should be okay. But this will depend on what lies beneath i.e. thickness of this strata, depth to water table e.t.c.

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

I agree with the above posts that it is feasible, as i've done it many times. I usually provide a movement joint though to account for differential settlement.

Kieran
 

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

In general, you can't mix the two simply because of the incompatible strains; however, if you have two distinct parts of a structure, you can found them on two different systems, provided you know the differences and join them accordingly.

RE: Half and half foundation-Piles & Shallow footings

Ron,

Why do the strains necesarily need to be incompatible? Surely for many situations it is possible to control the stress in order to negate the difference in strains. Hard work, yes, but impossible, no.

In some strata, I would say that the worst thing you could do for strains would be to locate everything on shallow footings.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources