INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Do CMU piers meet IBC 2006?

Do CMU piers meet IBC 2006?

(OP)
I'm evaluating a 70 year old house that is supported by CMU block piers on 2" CMU spread footings.  Is this leagal?

RE: Do CMU piers meet IBC 2006?

I don't know how a 70 year old house could be expected to "meet IBC 2006".  What do you mean by "Is this leagal?"

RE: Do CMU piers meet IBC 2006?

hokie66 : Pretty sure he meant " Is this ligal " !

RE: Do CMU piers meet IBC 2006?

If the piers are solid grouted, attached to the beams and 2" slab to prevent "walking" in a seismic event, and the 2" CMU slabs are buried sufficiently to prevent "walking", being sized for the bearing loads seen, I see no problems with the connection other than untreated wood to concrete contact.

From the picture shown, the 2" slab does not see much if any bending, the load from the CMU blocks being distributed to the soil structure through the 2" CMU in shear at a 45 degree plane - no bending.  No problem for me.

However, the wood beams appear to be another matter.  The one on the right appears to be deteriorated.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Do CMU piers meet IBC 2006?

Is there a specific defect that brought you to this issue (other than the fore-mentioned unprotected timber) or is it one of those "Id like to have my house inspected for various reasons". Maybe settlement cracks showing up inside?  

-Robert Miller, E.I.T.
KPA Structural Engineers

RE: Do CMU piers meet IBC 2006?

For a house of that age the better question is; is it adequate?

Judging by the apparently more recent packer it barely appears to be adequate (as would be expected with the underside of footing at 3" deep.

It's obviously not original as the other piers are the nice looking tapered CIP concrete ones.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close