×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

(OP)
Large condensor (horizontal tubular ht xchgr) has over 1400 3/4 OD tubes which contain cooling water at 30 psi.  The shell surrounding the tube bundle contains a gas/vapor at less than 5 psi.  Both the shell side and tube side are rated at 50 psi and Code (U) stamped.

The shell has developed 2 very serious cracks (180 deg. apart) in the middle shell course propogating from large inlet nozzle in top of shell. Due to the large cracks, best NBIC repair method would be to replace the shell course and inlet nozzle, however the shell portion does operate at less than 5 psi.

Jurisdictional rules require vessels greater than 15 psi and 5 cubic feet be Code stamped...since shell side operates at less than 5 psi, could new saftey valve(s) set at 6 or 7 psi be installed on shell side and the Code stamping for the shell side be obliterated on the nameplate?  Then the repair of the cracked shell could be done as "non-code" till new vessel can be received and installed? (Typically, the shell side is operating at about 1 to 2 psi).  The Code pedigree for the tube side and channel side would remain since they do exceed 15 psi.

RE: Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

Bocephus,
I believe there was a good reason for designing both sides for 50 psi, because in case of failure, the shell side could see 30+ psi. My advice is to not rubbish the good condenser with cheap spin to the code and do the right thing, do the repair as per the code and you will sleep better at night, without keeping vigil waiting for the knock on your door. Murphy says if it could go wron, it will.
Cheers,
gr2vessels

RE: Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

I concur with gr2vessels, do the right thing.  How much more can it cost anyway?  

At the same time you should have a metallurgical F/A done on the cracks.  A good failure analyst will include recommendations for reducing the risk of recurrence.   

RE: Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

I concur with the post above and strongly recommend that the reason for cracking be determined prior to repairs so appropriate measures can be taken to eliminate future cracks. if the vessel is replaced in kind you will still have the cracking potential seen on the presently installed one. At the same time check the piping around the nozzle as vibration and loading are some causes for cracking around nozzles.  
In my career (40+ years) I've seen one nameplate removed from operating equipment.

Could you post a picture of the vessel and cracked area?
 

RE: Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

I concur with the above posts. Moreover, I think lowering the MAWP on a pressure vessel is seen as a Alteration in most jurisdiction. So you have to deal with them anyway.  

RE: Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

The Code Stamp applies the day the new vessel is released for service. From then on it is the responsibility of the owner to operate and repair the vessel prudently (according to state law, etc).

RE: Removing Code "pedigree" on shell side of Heat Exchanger

(OP)
Metallurgical testing is being done to determine cause of the cracking and condition of the rest of the vessel, new condensor on order.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources