×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Proper order of overloads and contactors

Proper order of overloads and contactors

Proper order of overloads and contactors

(OP)
Hello,
On most drawings I see of motor wiring, the breaker is shown first, followed by the contactor, then followed by the OL.  With MSPs, this order isn't possible anymore, as the breaker and OL are one single device.  But people still draw that way, and even Autocad's electrical symbol library show that breaker, contactor, OL order.  Is there now, or was there ever, a benefit to putting the overload downstream of the contactor?  FYI, I'm referring to small motor applications where the OL actually breaks the current and the control circuit.

thanks
EE

RE: Proper order of overloads and contactors

Going out on a limb here to assume you are referring to North American symbols, IEC sysmbols are different and don't really have this problem.

No, it makes no difference. It was only ever done on motor starters for the sake of convenience because early overloads were dash-pot oil delayed current sensing relays and if the oil leaked, it would be really messy and potentially dangerous to have them dripping oil onto the contactors. So the dash-pot oil relays were always at the bottom of the panel and that's where you would terminate the motor leads. Design followed convention and eventually it just became the standard symbolic representation.

By the way, if you look at it, the drawing symbol for a Thermal Magnetic Circuit Breaker is going to show the same component elements as a Motor Protective Switch, so I use those. I've seen some people put a slanted arrow through the thermal symbol, I assume to denote adjustability, but that is not a standard ANSI symbol. I just put a small label next to it that says "Motor Protective Switch with TOL", no big deal.

"Dear future generations: Please accept our apologies. We were rolling drunk on petroleum."
— Kilgore Trout (via Kurt Vonnegut)
  
For the best use of Eng-Tips, please click here -> FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies  

RE: Proper order of overloads and contactors

(OP)
Jraef,
Thank you for that highly informative answer.  I knew there was a reason.

EE

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources