×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

(OP)
Hi,

If I have a utility transformer, lets say 13.8 kv/0.6V DY1n, 2MVA, with the neutral grounded at the MV/LV utility substation ground grid, and then I am going to distribute the energy with a 4 wire cable (3ph + neutral)and connect the neutral to ground at every main service point with a grounding electrode.

Correct me if I am wrong but it seems to me that the  substation ground grid and the electrodes at each service point are then all connected through the neutral wire.

What happens in case there is a fault at the MV size of the substation? Then all the ground grid at the substation and the electrode system at the service point will be rise to GPR that can be more than the 600 V of a LV system. Does this mean that the electrode systems at every service point need to comply with the IEEE 80 requirements for step and touch voltage?

Why then the NEC recommend this practice (250.24)? Shouldn't we isolate the neutral from the substation ground grid and connected only to the service point electrodes?

Thanks.
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

Then what happens if there is a Ø-grd fault on the LV side of the transformer at the substation?  There will be no return path to the transformer neutral except for a long path through earth to the service point neutral-earth connection.  
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

(OP)
jghrist

I understand that if there is a ground fault at the LV side of the transformer the only return path for the fault current will be the earth. This will produce a GPR at the Substation and also at the electrode earthing point at the service. But I think the GPR produced by a ground fault of a LV system is less than the GPR produced by a fault at the MV side. no?

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

My concern is the ability to sense and trip the fault.  Do you have sensitive earth fault protection?

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

"What happens in case there is a fault at the MV size of the substation?"

If you have a SLG fault of the MV side of the substation, I assume that this is a grounded source (let's say substation transformer is 115kV Delta - 13.8kV grounded Wye).  The ground fault current will circulate within the substation ground grid back to the nuetral point on the transformer.  There will be no GPR, just circulating current.  

The current will return to the source, not down the distribution line. The multi-grounded distribution nuetral is not really part of the circuit for a substation bus fault.  It would be for a HV fault, but that's another story...

(before I get too much backlash, there will be some small GPR, but because both the fault and the source are located within the same ground grid, there will be minimal leakage current into the soil, therefore minimal GPR)

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

I think the substaion referenced by the OP is the 13.8 kv/0.6V DY1n, 2MVA transformer, not the HV/MV substation.
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

(OP)
eamonkerrigan

If I understand correctly you talk about the following system>

115kV / 13.8 kV Dyn1---line---13.8kV / 0.6 V Dy1n

If you have a fault at the MV size of the 13.8/0.6V substation you will have a GPR at this substation that will rise the neutral and everything connected to it by an electrical conductor. Thats why I have a concern about connecting the neutral to the earthing grid at the this substation.

jghrist

I will have an RCD at the main service.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

Utilities normally bring the neutral along the distribution lines to feed the customer transformers, in your example a typical 13.8kV/0.6kV 2MVA DY1 transformer.

If there is a L-G fault at the 13.8 side of the 2MVA transformer in the substation, say a down wire. Earth is not the only return path, it will paralleled with the system neutral all the way back to the upstream station.  Utility tie the neutral to ground every 3 - 5 poles, so the fault current will split between the earth path and the neutral path.

To control the step and the touch voltage, you may vary the size of the mesh and put 6" thick clear gravel in the substation.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

Quote:

I will have an RCD at the main service.
Is there an RCD at the MV/LV substation?  Is this what you are referring to as the main service or are there only RCDs at the individual service points?  If not, what is the protection at the MV/LV substation?
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

If we assume 13.8kV remote source is grounded, a ground fault between source and 13,8kV-MV substation, will not circulate ground current at substation.
If grount fault is at 13,8kV busbar substation,   will circulate ground current at substation.
Circulating current at neutral 0,6kV could be ocurred only  by mutual indutance. GPR will not ocurr at main service point for these faults.

 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

If there is GPR at the station for a MV fault and there is a metallic connection from the station grid to the services (a neutral grounded at the station), then there will be GPR transferred to the service.  The GPR at the station will be limited because most fault current will flow back to the HV/MV source through the MV neutral, not through the earth.  Some of the fault current will also flow through the LV neutral, further reducing the current flowing through the earth and reducing GPR.
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

My  answer refer to the Cmelguet question:
"... and the electrode system at the service point will be rise to GPR that can be more than the 600 V of a LV system."
I guess faults on 13,8kV system, in theory,will not affect electrode system.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

(OP)
In my original question the MV transformer is delta connected on the primary side. There is no neutral being carried by the utility.

Odlanor, I dont understand why you said the electrode system at the service point is not affected by faults at the MV side? Can you explain. Thanks.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

cmelguet,
1)    Some definitions extracted from IEEE Std 80-2000
3.14 ground potential rise (GPR):
The maximum electrical potential that a substation grounding grid may attain relative to a distant grounding point assumed to be at the potential of remote earth. This voltage, GPR, is equal to the maximum grid current times the grid resistance.
NOTE—Under normal conditions, the grounded electrical equipment operates at near zero ground potential. That is, the potential of a grounded neutral conductor is nearly identical to the potential of remote earth. During a ground fault the portion of fault current that is conducted by a substation grounding grid into the earth causes the rise of the grid potential with respect to remote earth.

3.15 ground return circuit:
A circuit in which the earth or an equivalent conducting body is utilized to complete the circuit and allow current circulation from or to its current source.

2)    Your question 1.
I believe that your 13,8kV system has the neutral grounded at remote substation. This is enough to create a ground return circuit(3.15 above).
If is really not grounded , there  will not be short circuit fault.


3)    Your question 2.
You will not have GPR at  the service point ,because there is neutral current return at 0,6kV system for a fault at 13,8kV system. This is because current is not is conducted by  at  the service point electrodes into the earth to cause the rise of the grid potential with respect to remote earth.

There is a metallic connection from the station grid to the services (a neutral grounded at the station), then there will be GPR from MV voltage  transferred to the service point.
It can be mesh voltage or touch voltage. These voltages are tolerable potentials as your MV grounding grid was sized very well.
See Figure 12- basic shock situations in IEEE Std 80-2000: assume Etrrd=Emm or Etrrd=Emm.
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

cmelguet,
I'm sorry. There are corrections.

3)    Your question 2. ERRATA
............................................
............................................

There is a metallic connection from the station grid to the services (a neutral grounded at the station), then there will be GPR from MV voltage  transferred to the service point.
It can be touch voltages. These voltages are tolerable potentials as your MV grounding grid is connected to service points grounding electrode.

 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

(OP)
Odlanor,

I cant understand why the voltages at the service points will be tolerable?
If the electrode and the MV ground grid are connected, then both need to be dimensioned for the MV fault current, step and touch voltage, hence the electrode at the service point need to be a ground grid instead of just an electrode. This is like having two connected earth grids. If I dont have a grid how i will be able to control the step and touch voltages at the service point?

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

cmelguet,
I am only refering about transfered potential from MV to service points.
groundind system service points should be dimensioned for ground fault at service points. They wil define the cables and necessary tolerable potentials.
Tolerable potentials are same at MV substation  or at service points.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

(OP)
Pwrtran

Thanks for your sketch. Still have one doubt, how can you prove that   Ig2 will be smaller than Ig1? This will depend on the equivalent resistance of the grounding grid and the electrode resistance at the V2 Bus bar. Thanks and regards.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

Referring to pwrtran's sketch.

If the 0.6 kV neutral impedance is low compared to the ground rod resistances, then the voltages V1, V2, etc will be nearly identical (no significant voltage drop in neutral).  The currents will split in inverse relation to the grid and ground rod resistances.  Higher service ground rod resistance gives lower ground current, but the same voltage.

The single point ground system could result in very high GPR at the services during a ground fault at the service because all of the fault current has to flow back through the earth.

There is no sketch of the OP's suggestion of isolating the low voltage neutral from ground at the MV/LV transformer and grounding it only at the services.  In this case, there is no GPR from a 13.8 kV ground fault because the neutral is not connected to the ground grid.  If there is RCD on the LV at the MV/LV transformer, then the concern for tripping ground faults at the MV/LV station may be resolved (if it is sensitive enough), but there may be not selectivity with RCD at the services.  A ground fault at a service may result in tripping the RCD at the station and all services may be interrupted for a ground fault at one service.
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

Quote (cmelguet):

how can you prove that   Ig2 will be smaller than Ig1?

Because Ig1 is out from the MV/LV station ground grid that is normally a mesh of ground electrodes, but  Ig2 is out from a pole ground normally it is only one ground rod.  So, Rg2 is normally > than Rg1, plus the neutral conductor also has some impedance thus some voltage drop.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

(OP)
Pwrtran

Ok I agree with you that Ig1 will be higher than Ig2 in most of the cases.

Should I dimmension the ground rods at the service point as a ground grid instead? I ask becouse even if Ig1 is higher than Ig2 you still need to warranty the step and touch voltage at the service points. Strange but i have only see single electrodes at the service points, i dont understand why?

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

cmelguet

I would say come to this point you should go by the local electrical safety code to control the step and touch.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

cmelguet
I opened your attachment but only found a page with no drawing. I did not understand.

pwrtran
the attachment shows my point of view. I confess that it is necessary a more detailed analysis of the object. Perhaps transformer:  phasor diagram, polarity (additive / subtractive), type (core / shell), load.

 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

odlanor,
Your sketch is the same as pwrtran's Multiple Ground System except that it does not show the return current through the service ground rods.  There will be some because these are paths in parallel to the main return directly through earth from the substation grid.

How much will flow depends on the relative impedance of the parallel paths.  Let's make a simplified example.  It is simplified because it does not take mutual impedances into account.  Assume a 1 ohm grid resistance and 25 ohm ground rod resistances at each of two services, the first 500m from the station and the second 1000m away.  Assume 5000A 13.8 kV ground fault current.

2 MVA at 600V is 1924A, so let's assume a neutral of 2-500 mm² conductors.  Impedance will be about 0.05 ohms/km.  Total parallel impedance of the three grounds will be approximately 0.926 ohm.  Total GPR will be 5000·0.926 = 4630V.  Current through earth directly from the station grid will be 4630/1 = 4630A.  Current through each of the service grounds will be about 4630/25 = 185A.  Voltage drop through the neutral to the first service will be 185·2·0.05·0.5 = 9.25V, leaving a GPR of 4630-9 = 4621V.  Voltage drop through the neutral to the second service will be 185·0.05·0.5 = 4.6V, leaving a GPR of 4621-5 = 4616V.

I've made a bunch of simplifying assumptions like adding impedances to resistances arithmetically, but the point is that there is not much voltage drop in the neutral if the impedance is low compared to the ground rod resistance.  The GPR at the services is about the same as at the station.  Is it too high?  It depends.  The current flowing through the service ground is low, so there won't be much voltage gradient around the ground rod. Touch potentials are low if the voltage gradient is low.  There could be a high voltage between equipment connected to the power ground and telephone lines that are grounded remotely.

This is all very difficult to calculate accurately.  The situation is quite common and not considered in most low voltage service safety codes.  Have you ever heard of anyone being electrocuted by contacting grounded equipment at a service remote from a substation during a station MV fault?  I haven't.
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

(OP)
jghrist

Great example and calculation. It actually explain my doubts. The problem is that you not allways have a high resistance at the service points, compare to the main grid at the MV substation. Imagine is not a house service point, instead is a compresor house with a 10m x 10m earthing grid area. I might have depending on the ground resistance a smaller equivalent earth grid resistance than the resistance at the Substation grid. How I will dimension in this case the ground grid at the compresor house?. Should I follow the IEEE 80 std , which I understand is for substations and not for LV service points?.    

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

I do not agree with the flow of ground currents of Pwrtran  anexx  because:
1 - 13.8 kV system does not transfer ground current to 600V system because of 13,8kV-delta of winding SE-Cmelguet . All ground current ,return  from SE-Cmelguet  to SE- Source
Hence, the flow has no sense of IG2, IG3, Ign  to SE-Source.
2-On the other hand, if really GPR at SE-Cmelguet injects ground current at 600V neutral system, then the return current should be came back  to the  remote-earth of SE-Cmelguet  or disappears  at the service points remote-earth.

I have no familiarity with low-voltage design. You are calculating the currents of a 4-wire system instead of  3- wire system  shown in the Pwrtran Annex.
I think the Cmelguet  system representation  is more representative in my Annex, extracted from Std. IEEE-80 -2000.
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

odlanor

Then what is the 448A current flow in IEEE 80 Fig 31 and where does it flow to?  

On the same page of the standard, Section 15.6 gives you the answer!

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

pwrtran,
There are 3 point or bus to consider in grounding system:
neutral bus(system), ground bus(enclosure), earth bus(grid).
IEEE 80 Fig 31 ,  448A current flow from earth bus to ground bus ,not from earth bus to neutral bus.
In your Fig. it goes from earth bus  to neutral of 600V star winding.

Section 15.6 doesnt apply in my interpretation.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

The neutral connection will reduce the voltage rise at the substation especially if it is a dense MEN as in a city. You can have literally thousands of MEN connections so the transfer hazard is negligible. If fact disconnecting the MEN may cause hazards in the vicinity of the substation as the voltage rise of the earth mat may increase considerably.

Disconnecting the neutral would only be considered if the MEN is sparse such as in a rural environment and the transfer voltage causes problems, or if you are supplying a mine which has much more stringent safety criteria.

The only way to determine is there is a problem is to test and measure the transfer directly.

 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

odlanor

Unfortunately, current will find its way back no matter you like it or not, or how you describe it as a neutral bus or a ground bus, as long as there is a path.

In AC system, current will flow if any of the below two conditions is true:
A) potential difference
B) torque angle difference

You have to respect the ohm's Law.  In your example, the Wye winding of the MV/LV station transformer is grounded, which means it is tied to the station grid.  Also the neutral conductor is multiple grounded along the distribution line.  When a MV line-ground fault occurs in the MV/LV station, the GPR will bring the neutral conductor to the same potential at the point where it tie to the grid.  As the neutral conductor leaving the station, there will be potential difference between the neutral and the pole ground where the neutral conductor also bonded to ( which is a so called multiple ground system), thus there will be current flow.  That is why IEEE 80 shows how to calculate the current splitting factor.

When designing the ground grid, one fact you need to take into account is the sky wires, neutral conductor, and even other metallic objects as the auxiliary ground electrodes, which will dissipate the Ig.  Please refer the Section 9.5 of the IEEE 80.

I don't think your statement "Section 15.6 doesn't apply in my interpretation. " holds stand.

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

One thing that is different in the IEEE 80 figure from the OP system is the existence of a metallic ground wire from the substation grid to the remote source.  In the OP system, there is no metallic MV ground wire, so all fault current has to flow through the earth, either directly from the station grid or through the LV neutrals to the service grounds.  A MV ground wire would greatly reduce GPR by providing a low impedance path for return current other than through the earth.
 

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

pwrtran ,
You Fig represents a 0.6kV 3-wire system instead of  4-wire Cmelget. So,"...the pole ground where the neutral conductor also bonded to (which is a so called multiple ground system.. ", is not true.
Neutral of 0.6kV at Cmelguet-SE is bonded to ground grid and thats all!
2-On the other hand,in your Fig.,  if really GPR at SE-Cmelguet injects ground current at 600V neutral system, then the return current should be came back  to the  remote-earth of SE-Cmelguet  or disappears  at the service points remote-earth, instead return to Source-SE.
I have been analysing  your Fig. without any existence of metallic ground wire, counterweight grounding cable  and so on.
  

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

Then I would say you looked the wrong link!  Please check my post again smile

RE: neutral grounded conductor transferred GPR

pwrtran ,
it will be the second wrong link!First one was from Cmelguet.
I´m sorry. Lets stop here.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources