×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

direct acting pressure reducing valve mislabeled?

direct acting pressure reducing valve mislabeled?

direct acting pressure reducing valve mislabeled?

(OP)
We just installed at PRV Station #2 a 1-1/2" Cla-Val Model 990 with a label of 80-140 psi on it - that caught my attention because I needed the other one with an adjustment range of 30-90 psi as my outlet pressure required is 40 psi.  

This put me in a bit of a panic, so I ran down to the site and took the up and downstream pressures of the PRV.  The gauge recorded 81 and 40 psi, respectively.

Unfortunately, I cannot get a flow measurement through the valve, but I could not hear the flow going thru (unlike the other PRV Stations that sometimes roar).  I have a tech rep coming in June to look, but there is no way to tell what's in the valve because it is one piece.  He said that you have the correct valve but mislabeled if the downstream pressure remains 40 psi in static conditions.  He said that this valve should not work anyway because it is outside the adjustment range.  ???

Has anyone experienced this before and what did you find out?   

RE: direct acting pressure reducing valve mislabeled?


You have in my opinion actually three possible answers:

1. You are correct. The spring is changed without altering the (standard?) outer marking for the valve. This is not unlikely as changing of the spring for this type of valve is fairly common out from a stockist. Control: what does the underlying documents describe, your order and suppliers confirmation?

2. You are incorrect, presuming your pressure measurements are correct, and the valve is supplied with the stronger spring. In this case the downstream force on the diaphragm (40 psi) must be high enough to close the valve sufficiently against springforce and action of 80 psi, to give the reducing effect from 80 psi to 40 psi. Seems a bit farfetched, but not impossible. Control: only producer can confirm if this is within possible limits.

3. You are incorrect, eg. stronger spring, and your measurements are possibly not correct or deviating. The pressure reducing effect is caused by a fully (or mostly) open valve with low cv (large throtteling effect) and a high flow demand, or possibly additional restrictions in your pipeline. Not impossible but again a bit farfetched.

I will 80 to 20 go for number 1.

RE: direct acting pressure reducing valve mislabeled?

We supply pressure regulators and regularly change the springs to provide alternative outlet pressures. When we change the springs not only do we change the the label, but every spec change is recorded and signed off by the person who did it.

A reputable supplier should be able to provide you with proof of the alteration.

Furthermore I would request a declaration of conformity from the supplier which states that the equipment can do what they say it can do, even with the wrong label in place.

Worst case scenario, the spring is wrong and something goes wrong, although the supplier is at fault, you have installed equipment which states an outlet range of 80-140 psi, which means its your head on the block.

Not only do you need proof of the correct spring to satisfy your own doubts but also to ensure the onus is on the supplier (and that they know it) if something goes wrong.

RE: direct acting pressure reducing valve mislabeled?



SEP87 - I fully agree with you on all points, and any reputable company will have the procedure you describe, but things tend to happen, and here something is wrong. In my opinion it still is most likely that the item itself is OK, and markings wrong.

But yes: the essence is in your two last sentences.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources