×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Importance Factor for Signs

Importance Factor for Signs

Importance Factor for Signs

(OP)
What importance Factor would you recommend for a 16ft tall school sign that would be located in an area away from the ordinary walk paths.  Sign to be located in Florida so hurricane winds control the design.  

ASCE and the Florida Building Code don't really help much and this seems to be a grey area.  Because of its size I might lean towards I = 1.0.  But their are arguments for I=0.77 and I=1.15 as well.  To me the risk to human life in a hurricane would be very low.  Worst case is this thing overturns.  The only reason someone would be their at that time would be if they were taking temporary cover.  But at the loads necessary to push it over you would be nuts at that point to be out in the open.   

John Southard, M.S., P.E.
http://www.pdhlibrary.com

RE: Importance Factor for Signs

If this sign breaks, will it fly?

RE: Importance Factor for Signs

(OP)
Nope.  The uprights are 16x16 masonry pilasters on concrete footings.  Some of the wood signage I suppose could break off and fly but that is it.  The brick, pilasters, and footing would definatly be too heavy.

John Southard, M.S., P.E.
http://www.pdhlibrary.com

RE: Importance Factor for Signs

Usually not much difference in design for 1 or 1.15.  So, if there is not - use the 1.15
.77 Seems low.

RE: Importance Factor for Signs

I debated this question with several building officials. My judgment would be as follows:

1. If it poses no risk to humans, (located in the middle of a field or nowhere close that it could endanger humans),  use 0.77
2. If located on a school property but poses no danger for human life, use 1.0
3. If located in school property on a roof of a classroom or right next to a class room, use 1.15

I hope this helps.

Regards,
Lutfi
 

RE: Importance Factor for Signs

I think the correct c&c loading would be critical to ensure that windbourne debris is generated during the hurricane. For the pilister design I would use an I of 0.77. No-one will be outside when the hurricane crosses and the masonry won't become windbourne.

RE: Importance Factor for Signs

I am sure we used to use 1.0.

RE: Importance Factor for Signs

I like Lutfi's logic. For what you describe I don't see a big difference either way (little more or little less), its just a sign structure.

RE: Importance Factor for Signs

i know it's "only" a school sign, but it seems to me that it'd be a good idea to minimise the amount of stuff flying around in a hurricane.  maybe you could design the sign to "fail safely" ... maybe have the sign facing spilt into two pieces but remain attached to the pilings ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources