×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

(OP)
When an unreinforced masonry wall goes from no grouting to partial grouting, the compressive stress from any axial load (live or dead), should go down, as An increases correct?  

In lieu of this, if I want to maximize my vertical compressive stress to offset tensile stress from flexure in the grout (from out of plane loading) it seems that adding grouting would not be the solution.  

At the moment my wall is failing because the flexural tensile stress in the grout is above the limit, now, by grouting some cells, it actually has an offsetting effect on the net stress because the additional grout lowers my compressive stress, which I was subtracting off my flexural tensile stress, however it does lower my flexural tensile stress as well... the key is figuring if flexural tensile stresses lower enough such that the decrease in compressive stresses don't put me in an overstress condition still ... per table 2.2.3.2 in the ACI 530-05.

After my analysis I found that as I add grout, the wall tensile stresses do go down as the section modulus increases, however, the net effect from the dead load stress doesn't help my overall net tensile stresses as much.  Therefore, if I were to fully grout my wall I'm finding that I still need to add steel reinforcing.  

Is this an appropriate analysis?

 

Scott  

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

When you add grout you add area. The effect on the net compressive stresses in the face shells is nil.

For simple low rise situations I would neglect self-weight altogether when looking at the flexural stresses in a wall.

You are finding out that hollow CMU doesn't have much flexural strength. It sounds like you will need make yours a reinforced wall.

   

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

I didn't think unreinforced masonry walls were permitted by code anymore.  They were when I started practicing, but that was back in the horse and buggy days.

BA

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

You are neglecting one thing--the allowable flexural tensile stress in unreinforced CMU increases as you add grout--see Table 2.2.3.2 in ACI 530-08.  So you do get a benefit from grouting, besides the increased section modulus.

And now I will be climbing into my horse and buggywinky smile

DaveAtkins

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

(OP)
@ Dave...


/Facepalm.  I was just looking at that.  Now the note that describes interpolation, as it referes to percentage, what do people typically do, take the full length of wall ... count up grouted and ungrouted cells, and do the division and interpolation from there.  Or is there a different way that is more standard.  I guess that seems the most obvious to me.

Scott

Scott  

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

Where is this wall and why aren't you reinforcing it? I'm with BA, I thought these weren't allowed anymore. And if it is existing, I have them add reinforcing to hollow CMU if we are altering the structure. URM in seismic areas is obviously bad news, and in wind you may very well have no axial load because of roof uplift if this is single story.

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

Where in IBC and/or ASCE 07 is URM not allowed?  I'm in a SDC A&B and design plain unreinforced, hollow masonry walls on the regular.

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

I don't have the latest code but I believe there is still a chapter in the Canadian Masonry Design Code entitled "Empirical Design for Unreinforced Masonry".  To use that section of the code, there are a number of limitations which makes it unattractive for many buildings, but it is still legal.   

BA

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

Unreinforced CMU is still allowed.

DaveAtkins

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

I inspect older residential CMU structures all of the time here in Florida, many being lightly reinforced if at all. It takes a very small amount of settlement or expansion/contraction to cause cracks in the mortar. Unreinforced CMU relies on the mortar bond for all of its strength in lateral bending unless you have enough compressive stress to overcome the tensile, which in modern construction almost is never going to happen on low rise (that I can think of). This is why I am shocked it is still allowed in the US and would never personally sign off on URM. Plus reinforced CMU responds much better to other stresses, such as those from differential foundation movements and expansion/contraction stresses.

Curious as to where URM design is still occurring and what are these structures?

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

We do mainly low rise load-bearing masonry schools.  OWSJ floors w/ concrete on form deck. OWSJ roof w/ metal desk.  Generally not higher than 2 stories.

95% of the existing schools are unreinforced load bearing masonry.  Many dating back to the 1910's.

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

Gerry- where? 8" CMU?

RE: Unreinforced Masonry Wall Stresses

Mainly 8" CMU. But up to 12" CMU.  Sometimes 8"+4" composite masonry walls.  I'd say 50% of the exterior walls end up requiring some sort of reinforcement.

Shear walls are Plain Unreinforced Masonry.  Interior non load bearing are unreinforced.

Chicagoland area.

We detail #4 Dowels @ 48" OC for the required mechanical connection to the foundation per IBC 2009.  We didn't do this up until IBC 2009.  No mechanical connection hasn't created any problems.  Concrete masonry is concrete, foundation wall is concrete.  Empirically no problems.  We've had lengthly discussions concerning this and its hard to justify to the owner (since we haven't been for some time).  Ultimately  we decided it would be a good practice (and to code obviously).

Existing schools tend to be 2'-0" multi wythe load bearing brick.  All of the 8" load bearing masonry my firm has done in the last 20 years is holding up well and we haven't had any problems.

Most of the owners we work with over long periods of time.  We work with architects which tend to rotate school districts throughout time, but we work with most of the architects, so we end up seeing our work down the road.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources