×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

crank position

crank position

crank position

(OP)
why is it that in internal combustion engines the crank is always positioned directly below the pistons? if it was offset would that not give designers latitude to address issues such as detonation / piston speed / rod angle etc?

RE: crank position

Economy of design perhaps.  With more offset, more clearance from the engine block would be needed on the offset side for the links.

RE: crank position

Offset crank would also increase skirt friction due to higher side forces.

RE: crank position

The current VW VR6 has the crank offset from the cylinder axes by 12.5mm or so, for packaging reasons.  So at some level of detail, the crank angle/piston position transfer function is different for the two banks.
That hasn't stopped hot rodders from getting high specific power.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VR6_engine

 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: crank position

Offset crank is the same as pin offset in terms of the mechanicals (and the maths).  Small-ish offsets are used to mitigate the thrust/anti-thrust forces in some engines (piston secondary motion and/or scuffing).

VW's massive crank offset is mainly imposed by packaging - the principle of a single head for a Vee engine gives the engineers some interesting self-imposed problems to solve.

Then there's engine balancing.

- Steve

RE: crank position

F1 engines usually have the crank offset upwards into the V, so they are running negative offset on one bank and positive on the other. This isn't for any fancy pants reason, just to get the CG lower.

Incidentally the technical term is desaxe, and it has been used on thousands of engine designs, including steam engines in the 1800s.

In theory it can be used for performance reasons, in practice it, or its close cousin gudgeon pin offset, is now used to reduce piston knock when cold.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies  http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: crank position

I knew piston pin offset would give the desired result w/r/t piston slap.  I didn't realize you can accomplish that with crank offset.  I can see how the effects might be similar in some ways, but it would seem that the piston pin offset would be the better lever to pull.   

RE: crank position

In practice desaxe is designed in at the whim of the original designer, the development engineer is the one out in the frosty car park fine tuning the solution with a bag full of pistons. Incidentally there are legions of racing engine builders who will claim that turning the pistons round on various engines increases the power.



 

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies  http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm?

RE: crank position

you can find a dozen-or-so of them right here on this forum.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources