×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Terminator networks for VFD
3

Terminator networks for VFD

Terminator networks for VFD

(OP)
Hi,

We have a problem of voltage spikes in a VFD installation (220V) with 7 induction motor fans in parallel (about 8 amps in total).

We have measured spikes in PWM pulses (50ns rise time) about 800V peak in the farthest motor from VFD.

We are assesing what to do (add reactors, dV/dt filters etc. etc.) and I found a "termination network" discussion about using RC network between phases matching the cable impedance like this:

R about 100ohms
C about some tenths of nF

Supposedly, at the pulse rise the R matches the cable impedance so spike is "cancelled", after that C charges to line value so no permanent power is wasted.

Has any sense for you guys? any experience or supplier with this kind of terminators?
I have thought that might try with three 100ohms 47nF snubber between phases to see what happens...


 

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Do you really have 50 ns risetime at the motor?

That is quite fast even directly at the inverter terminals and dispersion usually makes that risetime hundreds of nanoseconds at the end of the line.

It is not very common to have any problems with voltage spikes at 220 V. Not even at 400 V. Problems with insulation usually starts at 500 V and is very common at 690 V.

Are you sure about the probe compensation? It is next to impossible to have 800 V spikes in a 220 V installation.

Anyhow, the standard remedy is to use a damped motor reactor or a du/dt filter. Try a 2 % reactor first and add a parallel resistor to fight ringing and hot core. I think that three resistors with 50 - 100 ohms and 20 - 50 W will be OK in an installation like yours.

Snubbers are not used very often to reduce reflected waves/overvoltage at the motor end.  

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Allen Bradley has promoted their "motor terminal protector" for many years but, while it may protect the motor adequately, it does nothing to quiet the motor leads.

As skogs says, a reactor or dv/dt filter mounted as close to the drive output terminals as possible is preferred.

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

I would go with what those guy say, I'm sure they have a lot of knowledge on this stuff.

I have never played with vfd's, but it sounds like an interesting phenomenon.  I have some questions out of curiosity.

You don't have 6 identical-length cables and the 7th one longer, do you?  
What are the lengths?
What do you see at the others motors? (I assume you already measured them since you said this is the highest).
Are these cables shielded?  (I don't normally see shielded lv cables, but I don't know about vfd).
 

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

xj25
when you take into consideration all motor leads in parallel, what is the total motor cable length?
 

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

I did a quick simple simulation, which is not to be taken too seriously since the input parameters were fabricated, but it illustrates a mechanism where you can get unusualy high amplification when 6 cables are approximately the same length and the 7th is longer.

Slide 1 shows the system model:
Source ===SourceCable===== Bus===Cable1===Motor1
                                 ===Cable2===Moto2
                                         etc
                                 ===Cable7===Motor7


The source is a ramp increase from 0 to 1 with rise time of 50 nsec

All cables are selected to have 100 ohms characteristic impedance.

The source cable is selected very long so that the source does not produce any reflections during the transient. That simplifies the simulation.... the actual source characteristics certainly could modify these results.

Cables 1 through 6 are selected to have time delay of 201nsec through 206 nsec, which corresponds roughly to 201 through 206 feet.

Cable 7 is selected to have time delay of 400 nsec, corresponding to 400 feet.

All motors are 800 ohms (intended to simulate motor impedance much higher than cable).

The results are on slide 2.

When the pulse hits the motor, the reflection coefficient is (800-100)/(800+100) =0.778.  This reflection adds with incoming wave to give magnitude 1.778, which matches the plot.

The reflections of the 1st 6 all reach back to the bus at the same time (400 to 450 seconds). By looking at the response of the 7th line after it's time delay elapses, we can say roughly that the reflection from the 1st 6 upon hitting the bus tend to travel toward the 7th motor.   It is as if the 6 motor cables act together like one cable with lower impedance 100/6.... when they get back to the bus they have nowhere to go but the higher impedance cable 6 (100ohms), so there is amplification in this path.

In the end, we get close to 3 times the original pulse showing up at motor 7, even though it has the same cable impedance and motor impedance as all the others (just a longer cable). Normally we think of 2 as the highest, but this involves multiple reflections.  

Again, it is just an exercise in applying textbook transmission line theory, but would require a lot of further study and discussion to get any feeling for the extent that it would reflect a given real installation.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Quote:

  It is as if the 6 motor cables act together like one cable with lower impedance 100/6.... when they get back to the bus they have nowhere to go but the higher impedance cable 6 (100ohms), so there is amplification in this path.
"nowhere to go" was a poor choice of words, since a portion will be reflected back along the original 6.  But the important point is that it resembles a pulse traveling on a single cable of impedance 100/6, transitioning to a cable of 100, and we can calculate the transmission factor T=2*100/(100+100/6)=1.71.... and indeed we see that the increase which finally occurs at motor 7 (from 1.78 to 2.9=1.1) is prety close to the transmission ratio 1.78 times the first reflected portion 0.78.  1.71*0.78=1.3.   Actually it doesn't work out exactly (the increase of 1.1 does not match calculated 1.3)... anyone want to sharpen their pencil and figure out why?  I'm not sure...I must have made an error somewhere. I'm pretty sure the simulation is right and my handcalcs got astray somewhere.

Another note - I did not model the trailing/decreasing edge of the pulse.  If pulse duration were shorter than about 500nsec, then this model would need some changing.... the original incident pulse on motor 7 would stop dropping before the reflected pulses from the others reached it.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

I probably should mention something else that you guys probably already noticed.... this peak of 3*input occurs in 2 steps, rather than a single rise time.  Probably has nothing to do with what you're seeing if the entire rise you see occurs in 50nsec.

If anyone cares, I resolved my hand calc error.  One thing I forgot was the source cable attached.  It has source impedance 100/7=14.87, selected so that the source pulse passes to the 7 output lines without any change in magnitude.   So when that pulse reflects back along the 6 lines, it transitions not to the single line of motor 7, but to the parallel combination of motor 7 cable and the source cable (labeled T7_Para_Tsource below).

Below is sequence of signals parameters that matches the observed increase of 1.18 (2.96-1.78) at motor 7 when the reflection from the other 6 arrives there:

Parameter             Value        Formula
ReflectionAtMotor    0.777777778    =(800-100)/(800+100)
RefPlusTransAtMotor    1.777777778    =ReflectionAtMotor+1
T7_Para_Tsource    12.50098436    =100*14.287/(100+14.287)
TransmCoefAtBus    0.857181427    =2*T7_Para_Tsource/(T7_Para_Tsource+100/6)
TransmittedPastBus    0.666696665    =TransmCoefAtBus*ReflectionAtMotor
Increase    1.185238516    =TransmittedPastBus*RefPlusTransAtMotor

The 1.18 calculated increase matches the program's displayed 1.18 increase.  

I feel better now.  

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

(OP)
Hi, thanks for the replies,

diagram (see pdf attached for actual waveforms)
VFD--MCBs for each fan------(fan1)
                                 ---------------(fan2)
                                 ------------------------(fan ...)
                                 ----------------------------------(fan 7)

length to fan7 is about 20m. The remaining 6 proportional.

Pulse rise time was wrong, is 100ns. See waveforms.

Probe is differential I only have the measurements for fan7. I will check compensation (Actually I don´t remember to see the compensation screw, it is a Chauvin Arnoux diff. probe).

DickV "...motor terminal protector... while it may protect the motor adequately, it does nothing to quiet the motor leads."
Sorry for sure I´m uninformed but I think that I don´t understand this statment, then, what is not protected with terminal network?


Regards!
 

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Thanks for the recordings. If your probe is a C&A DP-25, there is nocompensation. So nothing to adjust. Measurement should be OK.

The recordings shown are not only reflected waves. Looks more like ringing and that, in combination with reflected wave, can explain the unusually high voltage. Pure reflection cannot get higher than twice the DC link voltage, 1.8 is a common value, and in this recording, the factor is 2.5

There are MCCs in the motor paths. They may contribute if the coils are inductive with very little R.

Dick probably means to say that emission from your cables (noisy cables) will not be affected by RC termination. There will be some reduction, but not much.

How is the 800 V affecting the motors? Do you have premature isolation failures? Or bearing problems?

I have recordings from motors with pure reflection. Shall dig and look for them.  

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

fwiw - I tend to agree with Gunnar (that's usually a good bet) that exceeding 2 is unusual and sugests something more than simple reflection. ie we don't expect a simple single reflection to exceed 2, so multiple transitions/reflections are needed... but it's hard to imagine how they would be coordinated to arrive at the same time.

Attached are two more simulations.

1st simulation as shown on slide 1 is same as previous except:
* I have put in the actual cable lengths
* I got rid of all the other motors except #8.
* I set the source cable length to 1nsec and got rid of the delay... now the source acts to have zero source impedance.  That may not be realistic, but if I put in a source impedance, it will tend to drag the final voltage below 1.   Have to think about that some more.

Results are on slide 2.  What is seen on motor 7 is a peak of 1.78 which we calculated before as 1+ (800-100)/(800+100).  The period is about 4 travel times ... 4 * 60 = 240. This  makes sense since the pulse will bounce off motor (OC) with same polarity, bounce off bus (SC due to source model) with opposite polarity, return to motor with opposite polarity have completed ½ cycle in 2 travel times.

2nd simulation is on slide 3. Here we have simply added in the other motors.
Results are on slide 4. Addition of the other motors caused motor 7 peak to 1.85, which exceeds previous calc'd values, but still not more than 2.   Period still 240 nsec which does not match measured 1mhz ó 1000nsec period.   If we wanted to describe this result in qualitative terms, we could say the interaction between motors is minimal, the longer cables tend to have higher peak because the the cable is approaching closer to the half the length of the pulse, where the theoretical reflection coefficient (up to doubling) applies.  There is some interaction as evidenced by the fact that motor 7 is slightly higher with others present, but it does not seem to be a big effect in this particular model.

None of this proves anything related to your motor. It is just a wander through the world of transmission line behavior and still a long way away from recreating your results or having confidence in any model (I doubt we will ever get there).

I'm going to think some more about the source model.   If anyone has suggestions on that or other aspects of the model, feel free to chime in.
Can you describe the physical configuration of the cables.. what type of cable and is it shielded and which end.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

clarification in bold:
what type of cable and is it shielded and which end.
should've been
what type of cable and is it shielded and which end of shield is grounded.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

What is distance between the vfd and the MCBs?

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Quote:

fwiw - I tend to agree with Gunnar
Sorry, Gunnar had a different discussion than mine.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

(OP)
I will check, but think that are used separate cables for each phase, not screened. At least at the end connection where I took the measurement was like this, so very probably is the same all the way from VFD.

The MCBs are just near VFD in the same cabinet (0,5m?).

It is a new installation so hasn´t been detected any problem (yet).

Fans are EBM-PAPST and we have been told (before making the voltage measurement) by EBM representative that should be installed a filter like schematic adjoint. He refers to that should be verified that rated motor temperature is not overcome due to VFD duty, because it could cause insulation problems (maybe he is mixing several concepts here).
  
The filter is a kind of low pass plus isolation transformer. Do you think that really is needed something like that?. I don´t see the point of the isolation transformer (unless it helps with bearing currents?).

How long (usually) insulation fails are noticed with this kind of spikes?

Regards!
 

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

That's a full-blown sine filter with a step up transformer!

Very unusual. And very expensive. ABB have delivered a few of them for large machines. Never seen that used on 1 kW machines.

I think you should reconsider the whole thing. Do you really need that kind of fan? Is this a very special installation? Like clean room for semiconductors or a medical lab?

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Quote:

I don´t see the point of the isolation transformer (unless it helps with bearing currents?).
Again, I'm not a vfd guy. Throwing in my 2 cents and hoping to learn. Anyone correct me if I'm wrong.
It seems the purpose of the isolation transformer would be
1 - limiting high dv/dt pulses at the motor;
2 - limiting common mode voltlage so as to limit bearing current.

Neither of these goals seem to have been accomplished.
#1 – we can see in your graphs that we have very high magnitude and high frequency content of thes pulses.

I would say #2 is not accomplished either. Here is my simple understanding of common mode voltage:  we switch a given phase between + and -.   The + and – are voltages with respect to ground since they derive (via rectifier) from input power which is grounded.   Since we have 3 phase system, we always have 2 on + and 1 on – or 1 on + and 2 on -..... either case represents common mode voltage that can encourage zero-sequence voltage to ground. The fact that it has such high frequency  means it can flow easily through capacitances to make it's way from stator to rotor. Once in rotor, it can simply complete the path to ground through the bearings.

Since these same pulses show up so distinctly on the output and at the motor, I would say it seems like the zero sequence cannot have  been reduced at all (and therefore you lose nothing in terms of bearing protection to remove it).

BUT, notice we have a ground on the secondary of this transformer.  That certainly makes it easy to complete the zero sequence path.    A question for the gurus:  what happens if we remove that ground on output of the transformer?.... wouldn't that be better for the bearings?

======New subject:====

Looking back to your attached waveform, pdf page 6/7.
The time to rise 800 volts is 0.4 usec = 400 nanoseconds.
It almost looks as if there are two regions of the curve:
First region rises 0 to 400 volts in 100 nanoseconds
Second region rises 400 to 800 volts in 300 nanoseconds.

It is kind of bizarre to start with 100 nanosecond rise time and end up with 400 nanosecond rise time.   Just brainstorming why that may be going on to cause that:
1 – multiple pulses (some possibly reflected) superimposed
2 – motor is acting something like a capacitor  (surge capcitor spreads out the pulse).
3 – dispersion due to the individual frequencies seeing different impedances and speeds  
Beats me... just thinking.  Any other explanations?

======New subject:====
Note in my previous modeling, I had assumed the wave was traveling at the speed of light in a vacuum, which resulted in my calculated  240 nanosecond period of ringing from the source  (by the way I don't think viewing source as short circuit is too unrealistic with reflect to reflections from the source because the multiple lines tied together at that location in parallel result in very low impedance).   But actually, the speed would likely differ from speed in a vacuum by 1/sqrt(EpsilonRelative), where EpsilonRelative reflects not just the insulation but an average of everything between conductor and ground (or conductor and other conductor).    If I pick the highest conceivable number EpsilonRelative =4 (probably unrealistically high for the average), even then we end up with speed of 1 / 2 speed in vacuum, and the period would double to 480 nanoseconds.... still a long way from the 1000 nanosecond period of your measured ringing.

The source of the ringing is a curiosity to me.  It is common in measurements Gunnar and others have posted (although not necessarily with overshoot exceeding 2). I have heard it referred to on the forum as LC ringing.  It may be the case, but I can tell you in large volumes of surge study by EPRI, I don't recall them every referring to anything like that.    The model of the motor for purposes of predicting voltages within the system up to the terminals of the motor is an R / C circuit (See EPRI 5862 Volume 2, Section 5), and an R/C  of termination of a transmission line does not create ringing.

Probably there is something I am missing.  I have a completely open mind to the cause of the ringing, because nothing I know of explains it.  I would be curious to know what is the frequency of the ringing occurs on motor # 3 which has about half the cable distance.   If it is same frequency, then I am leaning toward this "L-C ringing" even though I don't understand how that applies in this context. If the ring frequency is factor of 2 higher, then we expect something to do with reflections from the source (although I can't reconcile the frequency, and I'm not sure why we wouldn't see evidence of it on the source voltage trace).

Another question: the vfd output voltage traces you took are on the output of that transformer?
 

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

My experience with EBM-Papst motors in this scenario is that a sinewave filter will be very necessary. Check with EBM but typically the design of the fan/motor is usually of an 'external rotor' construction and the insulation class of this motor is typically very poor, hence the need for sine-filters between the VFD and motor(s).  

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Pete: The waveforms were taken without filter and transformer.

The transformer is usually there to step up voltage after the sine filter, where you lose so much voltage that the motor doesn't work well. ABB has (as always) made a virtue out of necessity and given the combination a name: 'Step Up Filter'

Patrick: I see, I have one of those in my ceiling. I haven't tried with a VFD. And will not. These motors usually have a high rotor resistance and can be easily controlled with a triac. Cheaper and easier than a VFD. And better for the windings.

xj: Was the VFD recommended by the fan/motor vendor?  

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Quote:

Pete: The waveforms were taken without filter and transformer.
Ah yes thanks -  that explains why it wasn't working!  Lol.

A mildy interesting article here:
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.15.3129&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Interaction of drive modulation and cable parameters on AC motor transients
by Kerkman, R.J.; Leggate, D.; Skibinski, G.L.;

It addresses some of the things we have been talking about here:
1 -oscillation
2:  reflection at > factor of 2 amplification

This author discusses oscilation on page 2 in a manner which I would say is very similar to what I described previously.   They identify that the oscillating period of the cable corresponds to 4 times the cable length.    The example figure is figure 1 where it can be seen tp is the travel time – first observed between inverter pulse and motor response..... then 4tp is the period of the resulting oscillation.   Why does this frequency not hold for the waveforms posted in this thread?  Beats me.... There's got to be more to the story somewhere.

They discuss two possibilities for reflection magnitude > twice the inverter pulse
First:  IV.A on page 5 discusses "double pulsing effect" which corresponds to the case of figure 3 (a few pages earlier) where the incoming pulse changes direction at the same time that the reflected negative wave hits the motor.   In this case, we would expect to see the final voltage end up zero (due to short pulse), but in the waveforms posted in this thread it ends up at 310volt, so this double-pulsing phenomenon does not apply.


Second: IV.B on page 6 discusses "Polarity Reversal" – this is where the pulse doesn't change to zero, but changes to an opposite polarity again at about the same timeframe when the first negative reflection hits the motor.    There is no evidence of this behavior in the one inverter pulse that was zoomed in, so we might be inclined to discount this possibility.  BUT, there are some interesting clues that this might be occurring.
First clue:  the data posted 14 May 11 4:47 in this thread on page 5/7 seems to show a very regular pattern of alternating magnitudes of the peaks at the motor: 800 / 620 / 800 / 620 / 780 / 620 / 760.   It is a distinct enough pattern that we suspect it may not be coincidence (if it is just a characteristic of system reacting to the same pulse every time, we expect roughly the same result every time).  So maybe there is some slight difference among pulses .... What difference in pulse can cause this.... Something like the oddball reversal of figure 9.    
Second clue: This is probably a bigger clue.  look at figure 9 of the linked paper and see there is an interesting feature that the waveform first goes in one direction and then reaches the high peak in the opposite direction.   That feature is shared by all of the high peaks on page 5/7 and by none of the low peaks.

So, there is at least a few clues that this "polarity reversal" of the inverter pulse might possibly be going on.   It doesn't particularly show anything like that evident on page 2/7, although there are a few tiny positive peaks evident above zero on the right side of that figure where everything should be at/below zero.  Since it is so far zoomed out, I don't particularly trust it to show a small polarity reversal.   Perhaps further inspection zooming in on a few pulses might show some clues.   You showed us one.... Perhaps look at a few more... maybe only 2 in a row are required if some anomaly is occurring every other one.

Just a thought.
=======
I'll be interested to hear like if this is a normal induction motor or a ceiling fan type motor.  

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Figure 5 of the linked article shows oscillation frequency vs cable length.  There is one cable type (Hypalon) with extraordinarily high dielectric constant (EpsilonRelative=11), such that the resonant frequency of 60 feet of cable would be right about 1000khz = 1mhz, which was what was seen in this post. Do you know the cable type by any chance?

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

A question ePete:

Would you have to take into account motor winding capacitances, or are they sufficiently decoupled from the cable capacitance by the series inductance of the winding that they wouldn't contribute much?
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

(OP)

The motor power is about 300-400W at current conditions (near nominal).

It is a ceiling axial fan type, and I think it is external rotor type.

Insulation class I don´t know but EBM seems worried about overheating due to working with VFD, so maybe is not very good. I will check on catalogue on monday and will ask them details about the filter.

I will check also details about cable type installed (should be 1.5/3kV insulation, halogen free type).

Regards

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Quote:

Would you have to take into account motor winding capacitances, or are they sufficiently decoupled from the cable capacitance by the series inductance of the winding that they wouldn't contribute much?
I think you're asking why I didn't include motor winding capcitance in the LTspice model.  The answer there is that I viewed it as a small effect and I was building a quick crude model.  But you're right, the EPRI model of the motor for purposes of predicting voltages at the motor terminals is an R/C circuit as I mentioned 14 May 11 19:29.   This might possibly be the explanation for the spreading of the pulse (from 100 nsec rise time to 400nsec as mentioned 14 May 11 19:29).  It would be interesting to add that capacitance to the model..... I'm just not sure what value to use (EPRI has only values for large motors).  Maybe someone knows a good value for these tiny motors ? (which for all we know could be celing fan type.... still waiting to hear about that).... I'll poke around and see what I can find on small motors.

While we're talking about the model of the motor, I'd like to backtrack to my statement about the model and whether it includes any L to create any ringing. (. I have heard it referred to on the forum as LC ringing.  It may be the case, but I can tell you in large volumes of surge study by EPRI, I don't recall them every referring to anything like that.    The model of the motor for purposes of predicting voltages within the system up to the terminals of the motor is an R / C circuit).  I do remember now reading several places L-C ringing associated with the TRV accross the contacts during circuit interruption.  But I still am pretty sure it does not end up playing any role in surge seen at the motor terminals under the EPRI model.  I'm not sure why it would be that L-C ringing applies in one case and not the other.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Here I have re-run the simulation by adding 2 features:
1 - add capacitance into motor model.
2 - use a reversing pulse.

Slides 1 and 2 show the model.  As noted on slide 1, I did not pick the capacitance value based on any empircal data.... I picked it based on the value I thought would recreate the measured waveform best (that might be considered cheating, depends how you look at it).

Slide 3 shows the reversing pulse that I used.  The negative peak is -0.5 with 100nsec rise time, followed after a delay of 500nsec by change of 1.5 to value of +1 with 100nsec rise time.  The 500nsec was again chosen to try to recreate the measurements.  500nsec is roughly worst case because the opposite polarity reflection of initial negative pulse arrives at motor 7 at the same time as the delayed positive pulse (for motor 7).... all of this under the assumption that I will create a 1usec period, which I did (it was a result of changing the capacitance, not changing the cable parameters).  

Slide 4 and 5 are results.  Slide 4 shows that motor 7 is the worst of all... probably because time delay was selected to create worst case at motor 7.   Slide 5 shows chracteristic of the waveform. It matches xj25's waveform in the following respects:
* Peak of 2.85 times initial pulse.
* Oscillation frequency of 1 Mhz (adding the caps slowed down the oscillation frequency... did not have to resort to the Hypalon cable assumption).
* Rise time in the neighborhood of 400nsec, depending on how you count it. (**)
* Initial negative deflection before large positive peak. (**)

Some factors that didn't match well:
** The initial negative deflection here is much larger magnitude than in xj25's data.
** The rise time in the simulation is relatively smooth, whereas xj25's seemed to have a distinctive kink, as if 2 slopes: one in the first 100nsec and another lower slope in the last 300nsec of the rise. The simulation did not recreate this.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

(OP)
ElectricPete, the motor is ceiling fan with external rotor type.

I think that don´t uderstand very well why is not used any motor winding inductance in the model. Could you just comment it?

I added to the model an inductance of 0.7mH in each branch representing the MCB coil (I made up the value from an inductance of MCB that should be something like 1cm x 1cm x 3/4turns) but then all the effect of the ringing dissappears sad.

About referenced EPRI 5862 Volume 2, Section 5, is possible to check it somewhere?

Reading in detail the VFD manual, it explicitly says that it should be used a output inductance filter if motors are cabled in paralel with star topology (however in bus it accepts it).

Looking for info I found this document that maybe someone finds useful.

I am having a quite busy time now so I will return when having news to tell you how it ends.

Regards

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Quote:

I think that don´t uderstand very well why is not used any motor winding inductance in the model. Could you just comment it?

I added to the model an inductance of 0.7mH in each branch representing the MCB coil (I made up the value from an inductance of MCB that should be something like 1cm x 1cm x 3/4turns) but then all the effect of the ringing dissappears

About referenced EPRI 5862 Volume 2, Section 5, is possible to check it somewhere?
The EPRI document is copyrighted.  It is a very valuable document imo, but prohibitively expensive if you're not an EPRI member.

A less expensive less-detailed article by the same authors can be obtained from IEEE here:
"Equivalent Circuits for Simulating Switching Surges at Motor Terminals" by Sharma, Gupta, Pillai, et al from IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol 3 , No. 3 , September 1988

Attached is an excerpt from that article.  Figure 2 is the model that these authors use for purposes of calculating surge at the motor terminals (the same model as the EPRI report).   It has resistance and inductance at the source, a transmission line representing the cable, and resistance/capacitance at the motor.    Even though  both L and C are present, I don't believe this would give traditional L-C ringing because of the separation of these components by a time-delay transmission line.    I tend to think in your case where there are many parallel cables connected to the source bus, then the source acts low impedance for purposes of reflections, since the parallel cables have low impedance.  Therefore I have assumed that neglecting the source inductance is not a big error here.  I haven't tried it out.... does your simulation show different results?  

Also I will mention that the multiple series L / parallel C is sometimes used to represent a transmission line.   The intent is that the discretization must be fine enough such that each L and C corresponds to a length of transmission line far less than the wavelength of interest (for example less than 10%).  In that case when the transmission line model is properly applied/discretized these particular L-C elements generate no oscillation.

As to the model of the motor itself, I have seen (not necessarily understood) a wide variety of models used to represent motors for a variety of high-frequency purposes.   Many of them do include inductance elements.   Some of them distinguish differential mode vs common mode. I believe the EPRI authors focus on common mode.   Which model is right I'm sure may be slightly subjective and certainly depends on the purpose of the analysis. Personally I tend to put a lot of weight on the EPRI report because it has more details than any other reference I have on the subject. But I'm no expert.
 

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

Quote:

The filter is a kind of low pass plus isolation transformer. Do you think that really is needed something like that?. I don´t see the point of the isolation transformer (unless it helps with bearing currents?).
From what I have read recently, the purpose of the sin filter is generally to minimize audible noise.  (That might make sense if these fans are around people). Other less expensive filters can protect the motor pretty well (dv/dt filter was mentioned) from vfd in general.  

(Of course don't lose track of Gunnar's comment... maybe a vfd is not even needed for ceiling fans which can be controlled by other simpler means)
 

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)'  ?

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

A delta:wye isolation tranformer on the output of a VFD makes a very good filter by itself. I'd suspect that any extra filtering they are describing might be just to remove a bit of the RF that still gets through.

Of course, that document says a sinewave filter and the drawing may just be a generalization not really represting any specific filter. There are sinewave filters that don't use an isolation transformer.
 

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

(OP)
I build on Pete simulation including TL model for ground return and MCB inductances and adapted impedance values for motor & separate single phase cables found in other references. Results remain more or less the same.
In Pete model the small MCB inductance will flat out the transients. Here not, but not sure if it is correctly done.

The difference with actual results is the duration of the transients, the real case is about 4us. I coundl´t get to adapt it without modifying quite much the "ringing" freq.
Using a serial inductance of 2mH eliminate the transients in the simulation.

Regarding varying speed "by other means" i.e. voltage, how much is the speed variation range than can be expected without overheating too much the motor? We are working with speed(freq.) changes from 60 to 40Hz more or less.
We have been recomended to use a multistep, stepdown transformer.

Regards!

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

get some ferrite line filters, Radio Shack sells a clip-on toroid, as do a few electrical supply houses. It may take three or four in series on the hot lead to dissabate the transients.

interesting that you are seeing turn-on & turn-off transients at the motor and not at the vfd.

good luck

 

RE: Terminator networks for VFD

EBM-Papst  says to use a sinewave filter and ozmosis is confirming this is required for those kinds of fans. It's an interesting exercise to try and filter out the spikes but it just doesn't make much sense (at least to me) to spend much time trying to engineer a filter to only eliminate the ringing when you can buy an output filter or a small delta:wye isolation tranformer and be done with the project.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources