S335 J2 vs S355 J0
S335 J2 vs S355 J0
(OP)
Hello,
In what conditions S335 J0 can be used instead of S335 J2?
In what conditions S335 J0 can be used instead of S335 J2?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: S335 J2 vs S355 J0
"in what conditions S355 J0 instead of S355 J2?"
Thanks
RE: S335 J2 vs S355 J0
is that at the notch impact test (longitudinal ) :
JO : absorbs energy min. 27 J at temperature 0 C
J2 : absorbs energy min. 27 J at temperature -20 C
So it concerns impact behaviour at different temperatures.
If -20 C temperature is out of every probability in the particular use of the steel then choice of S355J0 is OK.
In both cases however the price ( cost of steel ) is almost the same....
RE: S335 J2 vs S355 J0
for JO materials P, S values should be max 0,030 and N need to be 0,015
but for J2 P, S values are 0,025 and there isnt N ?
RE: S335 J2 vs S355 J0
J0- P,S : 0,040 percent N : 0,015 ( all maximum )
J2- P,S : 0,035 " N : no
( for long products P and S may be 0,005 more ).
All those qunatities are actually very small, so you should estimate if they are a concern at all for your application
( most probably they are not - this quality being conventional
construction oriented. )