ITAR verses AS9100
ITAR verses AS9100
(OP)
What is the gap between ITAR and AS9100?
Did anybody do a Gap analysis on it?
Did anybody do a Gap analysis on it?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: ITAR verses AS9100
Chris
SolidWorks 10 SP4.0
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion
RE: ITAR verses AS9100
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS9100
htt
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?
RE: ITAR verses AS9100
For Example:
§122.1 (a) Any person who engages in the United States in the business of either manufacturing or exporting defense articles or furnishing defense services is required to register with the DDTC. For the purposes of this subchapter, engaging in the business of manufacturing or exporting defense articles or furnishing defense services requires only ONE OCCASION of MANUFACTURING or exporting a defense article or furnishing a defense service. Manufacturers who DO NOT engage in exporting MUST NEVERTHELESS register.
RE: ITAR verses AS9100
Cabbages, knickers, It hasn't got A BEAK!
RE: ITAR verses AS9100
Take care and don't confuse Dual-Use vs. USML. Per 120.3 it is ITAR Controlled if: Is specifically designed, developed, configured, adapted, or modified for military application,...
If the part was originally designed for a civil application, i.e. a fastener for a commercial aircraft and then used in a military aircraft (without modification), then it is considered Dual-Use and ITAR does not apply.