×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Patran Fastener Idealization

Patran Fastener Idealization

Patran Fastener Idealization

(OP)
Hi guys,

I'm new in the forum and in using Patran&Nastran.
Sorry in advance about my english.
I was just wondering how to create a fastener between 2 rectangular plates.
I would like to create a fastener (or more) to joint the 2 plates: the nodes on 1 edge of the bottom plate will be constrained (no trasl, no rotat) and on the nodes on the opposite edge, but upper plate, will be applied the force (along the longitudinal axis of the plate).
I m able to mesh and create the surface, to apply the BC and the forces, but I have problems to idealise the fastener that join the 2 plates.
How can I simulate the fastener? Which mesh element? Do i have to create a curve between upper and lower node?
Sorry again for the english, I can explain again the problem..
Thanks
 

RE: Patran Fastener Idealization

The first thing is to determine what the equivalent spring constant ("fastener flexibility") is. There are many formulations available.

For the FEM, the standard methods are to use either a spring element or a beam element.

Spring - Simple and direct. However, if your problem is 2D, you will need coincident springs, which require extra tracking.

Beam - Able to automatically handle 2D, but you must first calibrate the beam's inertia properties to generate the equivalent fastener flexibility. Ultimately, you are after F=kx, which can be achieved with a beam element in an indirect manner.

*If you are attaching to a shell element, there is a small amount of local deformation that affects the overall response. In theory, you should make a single fastener case and calibrate this deformation out (for both the spring or beam element approach). I have found that roughly a 20% extra increase in stiffness is needed to account for the local softening where the fastener directly attaches. This may or may not be important to your model. Also, there is quite a bit of scatter in fastener flexibility tests, so this extra bit of calibration may be in the noise (again depending on the problem).

Brian
www.espcomposites.com

RE: Patran Fastener Idealization

Forgot to mention, you can also use a CBUSH element to represent the fastener. However, you should first become familiar with it and the various types. There are a few subtle nuances that could affect your model.

Brian
www.espcomposites.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources