×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Measurement of Surface Roughness
2

Measurement of Surface Roughness

Measurement of Surface Roughness

(OP)
We have a part that requires a smooth surface finish on a sharp radius (.005 / .010) of a brass part.  This radius is used as a sealing surface, so it must be very smooth to make the part  bubble tight.  

Our quality department has taken issue with the specifying of a 16 finish for this surface, because they don't have an objective method for measuring it (i.e. profilometer).  I've suggested that a visual inspection could be performed instead, but they're of the opinion that this is bad practice, because it doesn't give an objective result.  

I have two questions:
1.  Is there a standard for visual inspection of surface finishes?  I think if I can say, "inspect visually per ____", that would likely be sufficient.
2.  Is there a good tool for measuring the smoothness of small, nonflat surfaces?  

Thanks in advance.

RE: Measurement of Surface Roughness

Well, you can get samples of different surface finishes produced by different processes - that might be a start, but it's still not a very definitive test.  Similarly you could get a 'gold standard' sample of your specific part that parts have to be better than but it's a bit weak.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: Measurement of Surface Roughness

"Our quality department has taken issue with the specifying of a 16 finish for this surface, because they don't have an objective method for measuring it (i.e. profilometer)."

Isn't that a bit backwards, specifying a design constraint based upon a lack of tooling or experience in the QC dept.?  How do they objectively measure any other finishes?

Make them buy one.  Or trust the supplier, if they have one.  A profilometer and a lathe head to sweep the indicator along a circular lay path, done.  May need to change the callout to specify a circular lay.

RE: Measurement of Surface Roughness

There are a number of different non-contact methods that capable of measuring surface roughness on small areas, areas with complicated geometry, etc.  There are various names for the instruments such as optical profilers, white light interferometers, laser confocal microscopes, etc.  Here are some links for additional information:

http://www.bruker-axs.com/white_light_interferometric_profilometers.html

http://www.zygo.com/?/met/profilers/

http://www.keyence.com/products/microscope/microscope/vk9700/vk9700_applications_1_1.php
 

RE: Measurement of Surface Roughness

BTW, in case there's some confusion, bruker surface profilometers & optical profilers were formerly Veeco, Digitial Instruments, Wyko & Sloan.

For sure, not specifying something because Quality can't verify it is a bit back asswards.  Specify based on function.

However, maybe they can sub contract independent inspection, if they don't want to trust the vendor/the vendor can't inspect it either.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: Measurement of Surface Roughness

(OP)
Thank you all for your responses.  I agree that our process is a bit backwards.  We make a concerted attempt to ensure that our designs can be manufactured, inspected, etc. as we're designing, which I think is good in principle.  Unfortunately, it sometimes results in the quality department thinking that it's our job to do their job for them.  

We're looking into some of the tools specified, but haven't come to a good conclusion yet.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources