×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Frequent Start-up/Shutdown effects on Fertilizer Plant

Frequent Start-up/Shutdown effects on Fertilizer Plant

Frequent Start-up/Shutdown effects on Fertilizer Plant

(OP)
Dear All,

Can anyone guide me to some reference (books, web, etc) where I can find the negative effects of Frequent Start-up/Shutdown on Equipments Used in Fertilizer Industry such as pressure vessels, heat exchangers, piping, valves, compressors, pumps, turbine, etc? Please.

Regards,

Tabby

RE: Frequent Start-up/Shutdown effects on Fertilizer Plant

Negative effects from cycling - increased risk of thermal/mechanical fatigue damage and failure = increased O&M costs + increased capital equipment costs + loss revenue.

How's that?

RE: Frequent Start-up/Shutdown effects on Fertilizer Plant

One point not mention above is that even for short periods of downtime you have to take care of any heat exchangers that have water on one side.  Keep treated water flowing to prevent the water in the exchanger from becoming stagnant.  This is to prevent MIC (Microbiological Induced Corrosion) from starting.  The effects of MIC can and are generally additive over time once it starts.   

RE: Frequent Start-up/Shutdown effects on Fertilizer Plant

All the information presented above is good information, but it didn't answer the OP's question.

Frankly, I don't think that it is taught as such (other than relationships like what a S/N curve is) in textbooks.  In other words, in answer to your question, I don't think you will find a textbook teaching this per se.

What metengr, boilerone, and unclesyd have offered is practical advice based on common knowledge.  The industry that metengr works in, for one, found out what happens to high pressure equipment designed for base load service when they were diverted to cycling and peaking duty.

If your plant was designed day one for cycling or repetitive start/stop cycles, then you might be alright.  For one, details like unclesyd brings out would have been covered.

However, unless your plant is drastically different from the standard Kellogg and Braun plants, it was designed to be started and run constantly, with maybe one turnaround per year.  Unexpected trips are another thing outside the the scope of the question as I understand it.

metengr, there may be some EPRI documentation re; the cycling effects on HP FWH's that would help the OP if he could get his hands on them.  Do you know of any that specifically address that?

Tabby, you might google up some documents called GE GER's and rummage through them to see if any address cycling issues on turbines.  Their turbines are larger than what you have in a fertilizer plant, but the principles will be the same.

You might also try googling HRSG's and look for cycling effects.  They have found out the hard way that what the previous posters have stated is true.

rmw

RE: Frequent Start-up/Shutdown effects on Fertilizer Plant

(OP)
Thanks everyone. It was really helpful. I found some data in Urea symposiums and IFA conferences reports. Actually the situation wants me to have some literature reference.

Regards,

Tabby

RE: Frequent Start-up/Shutdown effects on Fertilizer Plant

You should probably define frequency.

If the piping in your plant is designed to ASME B31.3 it is most liley design to the default 7000 cycles, or one sturup and shutdown cycle per day for a 20 year life expectancy. You should be able to find all the design data for all the pressure retaining components in you plant. The number of predicted cycles should be documented somewhere.

If not you are probably looking at gettting a specealist in to perform an evalution. It all comes down to what the plant was designed for and whether or not your current operational practices are still within that envelope.

A question properly stated is a problem half solved.

Always remember, free advice is worth exactly what you pay for it!  

http://www.ap-dynamics.ab.ca/

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources