×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Solving an equation

Solving an equation

Solving an equation

(OP)
I was not real sure where to post it but here it goes.
I am trying to solve the depth of sheet pile needed and the equation I am solving for is:

g=gamma

D^4-[8p/g(Kp-Ka]D^2-[12PL/g(Kp-Ka)]D-[2P/g(Kp-Ka)]^2=0

this reduces to D^4-54.54D^2-1227.1D-13.63^2=0

My problem is how to solve for D, I know the answere is +/-12.5.
The above problem is out of a book but is does not show how to solve for D. I need to know how to solve it for another problem. I must be getting old because I cannot remember how to do it.
 

RE: Solving an equation

Write a quick formula in Excel and iterate to a solution??

RE: Solving an equation

(OP)
I tried that but, I guess I don't know how to do that either. Because I did not come up with the answer they did.
 

RE: Solving an equation

My HP 48GX has a polynomial solver.
Stop by when you get a chance.

RE: Solving an equation

wetpaint,
If you start with the "reduced formula" and substitute + or - 12.5 in the formula it doesn't =0. Therefore, 12.5 is not the correct answer to the value of "D"

RE: Solving an equation

or the reduced formula is incorrect...

RE: Solving an equation

(OP)
Thanks everyone for the help. After thinking about it last night, I plugged the 12.5 back into the equation and could not get it to come out correct. I am following an example problem in a text book and there must be an error in the rounding of their answer and it makes a big difference. I entered sever numbers before coming up with 12.4287374 or about 12.5.

Again thanks everyone for the help.

RE: Solving an equation

Go on the internet as there are quartic equation solvers and solutions.

RE: Solving an equation

i think excel would be the easiest thing to use.  Set up one cell for your "D" value and another cell that has the equation in it.  Excel has a solver function and all you have to do is open it up and tell it to iterate the cell for "D" and your done.  Less than a minute to do everything.

RE: Solving an equation

BTW - Many textbooks have many errors.  I have found a few myself!!

RE: Solving an equation

Learn the "Goalseek" function in Excel.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

RE: Solving an equation

Whenever I do a hand calculations for sheet pile embedment, I get a cubic equation for embedment depth, not a fourth power equation.  Check your load diagrams and equation derivation.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Solving an equation

One way to write an iteration scheme is to ensure the order of the f(x) is less than 1.0, as follows:

X^4=54.54X^2+1227.1X+185.8
x= f(x) = {54.54x^2+1227.1X + 185.8} ^0.25
now plot  x-f(x), and I find it crosses zero at x=12.45 or thereabouts.

RE: Solving an equation

I think too much effort is being spent on trying to solve the equation as it is written.  As I mentioned above, the equation should not be a 4th power equation.  I have designed sheet pile embedments for many, many walls using hand calculations and the moment equilibrium equation has always been to the 3rd power, i.e., D^3.  See the attached sample embedment calc for a sheet pile wall.  wettpaint should check his original equation.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Solving an equation

Rather than copying a formula from a book, you should derive the formula yourself.  That's what I gave you, but without the top line load.  Take the example in the Das book.  Separate the active and passive pressures.  Add the top line load. Then, sum the moments about the bottom tip of the sheet piling, assuming the embedment is D.  Then see if you get the same equation.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Solving an equation

I solved Das' Example Problem 8.3. L = 15' with no unbalanced soil load behind the wall, an applied 2000 plf load, and the given soil properties.

I derived a cubic moment equilibrium equation.  After solving, I got a different embedment depth than Das but got the same moment.  I also used CivilTech's Shoring program which gave the same solution as my hand calcs.

See attached PDF.

10.08' is the equilibrium depth, not 12.45'.  It is probably just a coincidence that 12.45' is about equal to D x 120% = 12.1'.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Solving an equation

P.S.  The equation will change if there is retained soil behind the wall.  You will need to use the previous sample solution I gave earlier and add any other applied loads.  If the wall is not a cantilevered wall, the whole method will change.

www.PeirceEngineering.com

RE: Solving an equation

If all else fails just do trial and error start with numbers that you know are definately too large and too small and go from there by continually taking the average between the two closest numbers.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources