×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Width to Thickness Ratio

Width to Thickness Ratio

Width to Thickness Ratio

(OP)
I am analyzing an old built-up girder made with a web plate and pairs of equal leg angles for the top and bottom flanges.
It is quite a sizable girder (about 7' deep) but only has a 7/16" web.

I was wondering how out of line it would be to check the web slenderness h/tw according to AISC chapter B, by taking the height between the toes of the flange angles rather than the clear flange distance. The angles are 8x8's. If I checked the web between the vertical toes it would reduce the "h" value 16".

I cant see the web buckling where it is sandwiched in between the flange angles.

Anyone have any thoughts?  

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

TJ...I agree.  Web won't buckle in the "sandwiched" area.   

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

(OP)
Ron-
You don't know of any code provisions qualifying something like this, do you?
This just doesn't fall neatly into AISC's nice little examples chart in Chapter B of the spec.
I have wondered about this in the past too. This job has several girders like the one I described and I am trying to avoid the dreaded slender elements provisions if possible.
If it has to be done, so be it morning

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

Or maybe just to be a bit conservative - go 1/3 of the way past the toe of each angle?

 

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

(OP)
Yea-Maybe I could just work it backwards and see how far into the angles the limiting ratio puts me?

Back to the original question though....don't you think that using the distance between the angles is more in keeping with the intent of "limiting width-thickness ratios" as they are stated in the code?  

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

Assuming the angles are a bit thicker than the web yes.  Otherwise, if they are the same thickness or only slightly thicker, I think the answer is somewhere between the tips and the heel of the angles.

The angles can bend under a buckled web condition to some extent right?  This is analogous to the stepped column situation for bridge crane columns where the lower section of column is deeper than the upper section of column and the engineer wonders...what's the real k value and what I should I use?

 

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

(OP)
I agree JAE-
In this case the each angle is twice the thickness of the web...(7/16 web sandwiched between 7/8" angles).

JAE- I take it you have had the fine pleasure of going through figuring out K-factors for stepped columns....quite fun eh?  

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

I just stay far away from them....or go conservative and ignore the deeper part.  To much time saving a few dollars of steel to justify the extra effort on smaller projects.

 

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

(OP)
They can be a pain in the rear...
I analyze them quite often...thankfully I have some FEM techniques handed down to me from some guys who helped write the Mill Bldg spec that make them a little bit easier.
I agree...I like an independent crane shaft.

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

I believe this geometry is often used for railway bridges.  You might find some guidance in an AREMA Design Manual.   

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

(OP)
This geometry was used in industrial applications for years and years as well. The problem is, I have to use the Spec that the project calls for....maybe AREMA has some commentary, but I don't have any AREMA literature.  

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

In our local code for steel structures the effective web height is taken as the distance between the lines of bolts connecting the angles to the web. I believe it is the same in the Russian SNIP.

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

I think mikesg has stated it correctly per AISC's view.  Use the hole to hole dimension if bolted or the inside weld-to-weld dimension for a welded situation.  The glossary in the AISC 13th addition spells it out pretty well.

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

(OP)
bootlegend-
In the glossary?  

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

Well, actually it is defined in the symbols section right before the glossary.  In the AISC 13th edition, pg 16.1-xxxviii and pg 16.1-xxxix define h and h-sub-c.  

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

As mikesg and bootlegend pointed out, AISC's definition of h for built-ups is the distance between adjacent line of fasteners or the clear distance between flanges for welded sections.

On a side note, regarding JAE and ToadJones's discussion about stepped columns, there's an article by Suresh T. Dalal named "Some Non-Conventional Cases of Column Design" that gives guidance into determining buckling loads for stepped columns. Dr. White at Georgia Tech also has an AISC Design Guide coming out soon that talks about designing with web-tapered members (such as PEMB frame configurations).

Structural Design Engineer
New York, NY

RE: Width to Thickness Ratio

If you have a properly rivetted connection with two angles twice the thickness of the web, for modelling, you might consider the web to be 'fixed' at the toe of the angle or at least at the line of fasteners.

Dik

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources