×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

(OP)
I have a tall basement retaining wall (18ft) that I wish to design as a horizontal one way slab system (not a typical vertical one way slab/beam)because my horizontal dimension is much less than my vertical dimension.  I have perpindicular walls at the ends of the subject wall that can restrain the horizontal one way slab.  I assume I can design the wall as 12" wide horizontal strips and in accordance with ACI 318 one way slab provisions.  I'll verify I have enough mass/friction on the perpindicular walls to resist the end reaction and develop the horizontal steel into the perpindicular walls.  

My questions are: Do you see any problems with this? Do I really even need to worry about much of a footing on this wall (other than self weight of course)?  Do I have shear concerns at the ends of my wall? Reading ACI I don't get the impression I have to worry about shear at the ends for this case.  I plan to install #4 vertical at 12" o.c. for temp, shrink, and force distribution.   

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

It makes sense to let the wall span the direction that it wants to span (the short direction).  

For shear, you shouldn't have any problems.  You can use full phiVc.  

Regarding the footing, you'll have to evaluate if there are any other loads acting on the wall.  Is it supporting any framing?

If you're retaining on both sides you shouldn't have to worry about having enough mass on the perpendicular walls to resist any sliding.  

 #4 @ 12" only works for T&S steel if you're less than 10" thick.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Agree with everything Lion06 says.
Check φVc

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

(OP)
If phiVc is less than Vu/2 what are my options? Two way slab? I have never heard of shear failure in a one way simply supported slab. Have you? Even in a two way slab I see no consideration for shear except for punching shear at concentrated bearing points. For a simply supported one way and two way slab how do you design for shear? I have never seen such a detail, only details for punching shear, guess you could spec some goofy stirrups.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Design codes require a one way shear check on all slabs as well as beams. The only difference in the rules is generally that shear reinforcement is only requiresd for slabs if the applied shear is greater than Vuc rather than .5 Vuc for beams.

If the panel between supports is 18' (vertical) * 12' (horizontal) then it is a two way slab supported on 4 sides!

Also, make sure you do not use active pressure for the soil pressure calculation! You need to design this for full passive pressure.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

I wouldn't use passive pressure for loading a basement wall.  At rest soil pressure is appropriate, with due allowance for water behind the wall.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

ACI 318 only requires slabs to have a nominal strength, φVc greater than the factored shear Vu.  

The φVc/2 limit is only for beams as rapt suggests.

With this basement wall & horizontal spanning concept, you would use at-rest pressure not active.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

(OP)
Thanks Guys. I thought for slabs you had to divide Vc/2. That helps alot being able to use full Vc and that way my slab is fine.  My slab is not restrained by a basement slab or floor at the top of the wall; hence my reason for designing it in the horizontal direction. Thus, I don't think I have a two way slab, I think it is one way-horizontal.  I see no logic for using passive soil pressure.
I used active pressure, not at rest, so I should be conservative.

 

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Assuming you also have bars into the footing, you will have moment along the footing whether you want it there or not. I see this as supported on three sides. Though if you size the rebar for the horizontal direction and then use the same in the vertical direction, I think this leads to a conservative design. Maybe only a few more rebar than the min required anyway.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

a2-

I don't think you get a moment at the footing just because you have bars there (well, ok, some small nominal moment, but certainly not a fixed condition).  We design footings for vertical load only all the time and there are always bars from the wall into the footing.  It's about the amount of bars.  If you provide enough bars for shear friction to work and these bars can't develop a significant moment, I would ignore it.   

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

If you are spanning horizintally, you will just have a normal basement wall, but spanning horizontally.  The MINIMUM design soil pressure should be 50 psf.  It will not be a yielding wall, so higher pressures are warranted here.  

As for two way action, if you rely on such to reduce the horizontal steel, then you are saying that there is yielding wall action in the vertical direction, and you will correspondingly have to perform another analysis for the wall acting vertically.  This will affect the size and positioning of the wall footing.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

(OP)
msquared48, why do you say its not a yielding wall? Because of the end conditions? Speaking of which, I analyzed it as a simply supported. I realize there is some moment at the ends due to monolithic pour of perpindicular walls and steel, but i don't think it is a fixed/fixed.  Seems to me its restrained where as a cantilevered wall is not.  Also, do you guys have any thoughts on overturning moment? Do I need to consider this?

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Using active soil pressure is not being conservative. At rest pressures are usually greater than the active pressures plus, as already mentioned, saturated soil may need to be considered.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

When Mike talks about an unyielding wall, he just means that it can't move enough to allow active soil pressure to develop.  That's why you need to design for the at-rest pressure (plus any hydrostatic pressure that may be present).

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Alpine:

In a basement wall design, which is simply supported, the wall is considered "non-yielding".  However, a cantilever wall design is a yielding condition in that the top of the wall will move or deflect laterally.  In that regard the pressure is reduced by the movement.  Such is not the case for non-yielding walls such as the scenario you have.  Use 50 psf minimum.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

That should be 50 psf/ft of depth.

Right?

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Nice catch, JAE.  I was looking at the magnitude and didn't even pay attention to the units.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Good point Lion, I guess with this specific case the deflection will be minimal so the bending stress along the top of the footing will be low. Still, any amount of restraint will develop flexural stresses in the slab at the base of the wall, though the minimum amount of vertical reinforcement will take care of that I would assume. In theory, greased dowels into the footing would take care of this issue but I would not bother.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

ACI 350 recommends using 60 lb/ft3 above the water table and 95 lb/ft3 below the water table for "at rest" values of equivalent fluid pressures.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

The wall is hinged at the bottom, restrained at each corner and free at the top.  Moments and shears may be obtained from PCA tables for rectangular tanks (or similar sources).

If the foundation is well drained, there should be no water table above the basement floor.  Otherwise, the design requires special attention.

BA

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

"If the foundation is well drained, there should be no water table above the basement floor".

Not sure that is always true BAretired.  You can have a naturally high water table condition (such as that found in Grand Forks, North Dakota - 2 feet deep always).  A foundation drain won't do you any good in that condition unless it is pumped out - and only then it works if the pump can draw down the water table - depending on soil porosity, etc.



 

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

It is not always true, JAE.  In such cases, the design requires special attention but this was not mentioned in the original post.  

BA

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

I never depend on foundation drains to reduce pressure.  Good to have, but they eventually stop working.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

JAE:

Correct, 50 psf/ft.  Glad you clarified that.

Hokie:

And bottles run dry too (as in fail), right?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Our code recognizes the benefit of a drained foundation in controlling water pressure and so do I.  Otherwise, it would be necessary to assume a high water table in every foundation, something which is not common practice in my neck of the woods and evidently not in Mike's neck of the woods either.

BA

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

(OP)
Thanks for the great discussion.  Apparently I confused active and at rest with at rest being more stringent. Now my question is: when do you use either of these? I thought for a typical cantilevered retaining wall you use active, is that right?
What is typical for a normal basement wall restrained at the top and bottom?  I can't remember what ASCE says. I thought for basement walls ASCE allowed you to use active? Thanks.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

For typical cantilevered walls, use active pressure.  At rest soil pressure should be used for basement walls.  I don't know or care what ASCE says.

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

At rest pressure is the horizontal pressure which occurs naturally in soil at depth.  It is the pressure which occurs with no lateral movement at all.  

Active pressure is used for cantilever retaining walls, but it requires a certain amount of movement in the wall to justify it.  If the wall is very stiff, the pressure will be greater than active, but if the wall can't take it, it will simply yield until active pressure is achieved.

Passive pressure occurs when you push a wall or a foundation against the soil so as to fail the soil.  It requires lateral movement into the soil mass.

BA

RE: Retaining wall as One Way Horizontal Slab

Well put BA, this is the way I have always been taught, read in Geotech books, and designed walls...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources