Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
(OP)
Has the ANSI Y 14.5M drafting standard been replaced by ASME Y 14.5M? If so where is an inexpensive place to purchase the specification?
Thanks
Bill
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
|
RE: Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."
Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of these Forums?
RE: Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
ASME.org charges, I think, $135 per copy.
"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."
Ben Loosli
RE: Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of these Forums?
No I haven't what is your issue?
Thanks
Bill
RE: Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."
Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of these Forums?
RE: Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
So I should be removing ANSI from our prints and replacing it with ASME to be up to current?
Thanks
Bill
RE: Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."
Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of these Forums?
RE: Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
Thanks
Bill
RE: Has ANSI Y 14.5M been replaced?
DO NOT just change the spec called up on the drawing without updating the drawing to address the other changes.
It's is perfectly legitimate for old drawings to still call up the old spec.
Eventually it can become problematic because finding vendors that actually know the differences/the old spec can be tricky - but it's not fundamentally illegal or something.
It may be a good idea to create new drawings to a newer version of the spec though. Even here though the choice isn't immediately clear. The 2009 standard really came out at the beginning of 2010 and a lot of people aren't up to speed on it yet, so short term using the 95 standard may be easier. However, long term you'll hit the problem you have now sooner.
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?