×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Choice of failure criteria

Choice of failure criteria

Choice of failure criteria

(OP)
Hi all,

Lets say there is a composite structure which is exposed of an impact of a sphere. Should I use the maximum strain criterion to see if the laminas will fail due to the impact of that sphere?

And if I have the same structure but now the structure is loaded by a pressure over a large area. Is it then better to use Tsai-Wu? Can anyone suggest why it is better to use Tsai-Wu?

Im very confused which failure criteria to use in those two load cases.

Thank you so much.  

RE: Choice of failure criteria


"Lets say there is a composite structure which is exposed of an impact of a sphere. Should I use the maximum strain criterion to see if the laminas will fail due to the impact of that sphere?" > you are probably going to have to use fracture based approaches to predict matrix damage and delaminations.  Predicting fiber failure will likely required a progressive failure damage mechanics approach with fiber stress strength properties which are a function of strain rate.

"And if I have the same structure but now the structure is loaded by a pressure over a large area. Is it then better to use Tsai-Wu? Can anyone suggest why it is better to use Tsai-Wu?" > no, Tsai-Wu does not correlate well to test data; this has been discussed in detail in previous posts in this and the Aircraft engineering forum; do a search.  Recommend using max strain with properties derived from laminate (not lamina) tests.

 

RE: Choice of failure criteria

It can be quite confusing.

As SW stated, ply based criteria are not applicable to impact damage. If you actually know the state of the damage (which you may not) then you can employ a fracture technique as SW has stated. Short of this, the other approach is to typically obtain a pseudo-property called CAI (compression after impact). Because of this known issue in composites, it is well documented and often tested for.

For general criteria questions, this is a recent thread:
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=294778&page=1

Brian
www.espcomposites.com

RE: Choice of failure criteria

(OP)
Thank you for your answer.

I cant do any kind of tests. And I need to simplify things as much as possible. Progressive failure damage is not considered in my problem and I cant use that right now.

So, two load cases; One impact of a sphere and one pressure over the whole area. I need to roughly estimate which failure criteria to use. I now I need test data and stuff but that is not available right now.

Thanks

RE: Choice of failure criteria

SW and myself have given you the accepted methods. Short of this, you could make an engineering estimate. However, a good estimation would probably require prior experience with the problem and familiarity with typical impact strengths and failure criterion.

You are asking to solve a very difficult problem without using the proper methods. One thing that may help is that while compression strengths can be very low due to sublaminate buckling, tension strengths after an impact may not be significantly affected.

Also, why not start by reading the paper from the previous link? It may give you some insight into failure criterion. You may want to start thinking beyond Tsai-Wu.

Brian
www.espcomposites.com

RE: Choice of failure criteria

(OP)
Is there any link that you could recommend to read that deals with fracture based approaches?

 

RE: Choice of failure criteria

start here:  http://firehole.com/

probably the best composite analytical prediction methods and software out there

(and I have no affiliation with them, just have seen some results)

RE: Choice of failure criteria

SW Could you please explain  the following you mentioned?

"Recommend using max strain with properties derived from laminate (not lamina) tests."

Why not lamina don't we use lamina properties while we model finite element models?

RE: Choice of failure criteria

Typically many of us use lamina stiffness properties for analysis to predict strains in the laminates, and then apply strain design values which are derived from laminate (multi-directional) tests using the max strain criteria applied to each lamina to predict strength.  Laminate derived strain values are used because strength (strain) values from lamina ([0], [90], [+/-45]) tests typically do not accurately predict laminate strength (don't believe everything you read in a text book).  Search this forum; this has been discussed in more detail before.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources