×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Need help reducing simulation time

Need help reducing simulation time

Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
I am modeling air flow from the atmosphere and from jet exhaust over a plate on the side of an airplane.  Solidworks Flow Simulation works fine for air but when I check the "heat conduction in solids" option under General Settings the simulation time shoots up to a ridiculous amount of time.  Can someone help me troubleshoot this?

The overall goal here is to obtain a heat flux map over the surface of the Panel part.    

The model I uploaded was created with Solidworks 2010.     

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

Can you save it as SW2009? Thanks. At least a picture of your computational domain showing the finite difference cells.  

It is pretty obvious that when you are doing flow, the "mesh" need only concern itself with solving the volume. As soon as you add heat conduction you are adding many more "elements" to the "mesh" and you are adding more calculations. As a rule of thumb, the time it takes to solve goes up with n log(n) or some such.  

TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com  www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport

"Node news is good news."

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

What do you consider 'ridiculous' (and corollary: what would be reasonable/acceptable)?

I'm used to running these thermal flow simulations for liquid cooling systems, not for external air flow.  My simulation times would run from a few hours (relatively simple steady state) to 'over the weekend' (complex transient behavior).  Anything transient was at least 8 hours.

Can you take advantage of symmetry to analyze only 1/2 the geometry?
Do you need a computational domain that large? (I'm not sufficiently familiar with external flow to say it is/isn't the right size)

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

It would be nice to see what you are doing. As I mentioned before, you either need to post a couple views or save it in 2009. If you can post some views of the mesh, especially any areas where it gets fine.

Your domain needs to be large enough down stream to allow eddies to form and die out. That may preclude using symmetry although symmetry is permissible in a CFD analysis.

If you are asking about run time please share with us what you are running on and whether you are taking advantage of multiple processors and lots of ram.

You can run a low quality run and see if there are any problems before committing to a higher quality run.

I've seen people spend a week on a FloWorks run. That was steam.  

TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com  www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport

"Node news is good news."

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
Here are three pictures of my model.  The large rectangular box represents the pylon of a jet.  The small square in the bottom right of that is a 1-in thick plate made of several layers.  I made an indent in the pylon to allow the plate to fit flush with the surface of the pylon.  The disk represents the jet nozzle.  Hot air comes out of it at mach 0.91.  

I've uploaded four images of my model and the simulation I'm trying to do.  The image that shows airflows is from a simulation in which conduction in solids was disabled.  The other three pictures are the simulation I would like to run.  

 



 

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

If you can coarsen the mesh away from the parts that would reduce the model size. At the same time, if there are relatively thin bits of the solid those need to be finely meshed over. I know mesh isn't quite the right word for finite difference, perhaps subdivisions is a better term.

If your exhaust plume is at Mach .91 you might have localized areas with incompressible flow. That is going to make the analysis run longer too.

Another thing is that your domain needs to be shifted with respect to the parts so there is more downstream and less upstream. You probably don't need as much above, below and to the sides of the part either.

You are pushing your flat plat engine through the air. Doesn't that disturb the air flow in unrealistic ways?

TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com  www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport

"Node news is good news."

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
Should I use the "high mach number" option since the exhaust is traveling at mach 0.91?  

I think the flat plate does disrupt the air in unrealistic ways but I don't think it will be a problem for this simulation.  My goal is to compare different materials in the plate, such as Aluminum and Titanium, to see how this affects surface heat flux and maximum temperature on the plate.    

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

What simplification does the small flat "exhaust plate" have over modeling the whole engine as a cylinder with an appropriate inlet? In terms of your computational domain it is a small contribution.

TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com  www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport

"Node news is good news."

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
I'm not sure I understand your question. Are you asking if there is a reason I modeled the engine as a plate instead of a cylinder? The reason is that I am concerned more with heat flow in the plate than a perfectly simulated flow field. Do you think I should change it?      

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
The flat plate does have an inlet on one side, yes.  Now that you bring it up I might remake it into a long cylinder anyway.         

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
Here is where I'm at:
I did coarsen the grid and customize the computational domain more.  I got a simulation time of about 20 minutes on my 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 laptop with 8gigs of ram. Due to time constraints on this endeavor it will have to do.  Now that I know that a 24-hour simulation is not unheard of I am more confident that I am not making a huge mistake somewhere.

I am going to try modeling a large wind tunnel around my parts and run the simulation with internal instead of external flow. I am curious to see if this will reduce the time even more.  If so I can use a finer mesh for more accuracy.  

I will post results and pictures of the new model.     

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

I don't think a wind tunnel around you model will help much. The main thing is that your model should be shifted upwind so that there is enough distance down wind for eddies to develop. You can look at the distance around your parts as well in this regard. Don't have more distance around your part than what you need to develop any disturbances to flow.

I am curious as to whether FloWorks is using multiple processors on your system.

TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com  www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport

"Node news is good news."

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
Flow Simulation is using 2 cores.  I believe the Intel Core i7 is effectively a dual-core processor even if it only has one core.  That's my non-expert take on it.

The wind tunnel is working better.  The min/max table is not showing me unrealistically high mach numbers or low temperatures anymore.  Previously there would be certain cells with mach 5 air flow or temperatures way lower than they should be.  

Also, I only care about heat flux on the panel.  It seems like I don't need to worry about eddies forming downstream from the panel.  Does that sound right?           

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

The i7 can be dual core or better. i7 Processors

I have a Hex Core cpu and when I watch task manager doing surfacing only four cores are used at any one time. PhotoWorks uses all cores. Many SW functions use one core. The task manager will show one window for each core. There is some question about how many processors various parts of Simulation will use.

TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com  www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport

"Node news is good news."

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
I have an i7 M640.  It's a dual core but task manager shows 4 cores.  Flow Simulation only uses 2.   

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
Thats a beefy processor.   

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

I setup such a machine for myself, but with an AMD processor. My philosopy was to buy the fastest AMD hexacore (more bang for buck but not absolute fastest. I reused an old computer case and just bought a motherboard, memory, CPU, cooler and an SSD drive. I had to get a PCIXpress video card and reused a Raptor drive. This happened for around $1000 and in your case would give a 3 times increase in speed. Phenom cores are slower than i7, but there are more of them. You would have to move your SW license back and forth from your laptop to make this work.

So to summarize:

Reduce computational domain
Coarsen mesh/grid in areas that don't need refinement
Use internal flow

and

potentially upgrade hardware.

About beat this to death.

TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com  www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport

"Node news is good news."

RE: Need help reducing simulation time

(OP)
"Reduce computational domain
Coarsen mesh/grid in areas that don't need refinement
Use internal flow"

Done.

"potentially upgrade hardware."

Sadly I'm too poor for that at the moment.  Thanks for all the help!   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources