Need help reducing simulation time
Need help reducing simulation time
(OP)
I am modeling air flow from the atmosphere and from jet exhaust over a plate on the side of an airplane. Solidworks Flow Simulation works fine for air but when I check the "heat conduction in solids" option under General Settings the simulation time shoots up to a ridiculous amount of time. Can someone help me troubleshoot this?
The overall goal here is to obtain a heat flux map over the surface of the Panel part.
The model I uploaded was created with Solidworks 2010.
The overall goal here is to obtain a heat flux map over the surface of the Panel part.
The model I uploaded was created with Solidworks 2010.






RE: Need help reducing simulation time
It is pretty obvious that when you are doing flow, the "mesh" need only concern itself with solving the volume. As soon as you add heat conduction you are adding many more "elements" to the "mesh" and you are adding more calculations. As a rule of thumb, the time it takes to solve goes up with n log(n) or some such.
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
I'm used to running these thermal flow simulations for liquid cooling systems, not for external air flow. My simulation times would run from a few hours (relatively simple steady state) to 'over the weekend' (complex transient behavior). Anything transient was at least 8 hours.
Can you take advantage of symmetry to analyze only 1/2 the geometry?
Do you need a computational domain that large? (I'm not sufficiently familiar with external flow to say it is/isn't the right size)
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
Your domain needs to be large enough down stream to allow eddies to form and die out. That may preclude using symmetry although symmetry is permissible in a CFD analysis.
If you are asking about run time please share with us what you are running on and whether you are taking advantage of multiple processors and lots of ram.
You can run a low quality run and see if there are any problems before committing to a higher quality run.
I've seen people spend a week on a FloWorks run. That was steam.
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
I've uploaded four images of my model and the simulation I'm trying to do. The image that shows airflows is from a simulation in which conduction in solids was disabled. The other three pictures are the simulation I would like to run.
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
If your exhaust plume is at Mach .91 you might have localized areas with incompressible flow. That is going to make the analysis run longer too.
Another thing is that your domain needs to be shifted with respect to the parts so there is more downstream and less upstream. You probably don't need as much above, below and to the sides of the part either.
You are pushing your flat plat engine through the air. Doesn't that disturb the air flow in unrealistic ways?
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
I think the flat plate does disrupt the air in unrealistic ways but I don't think it will be a problem for this simulation. My goal is to compare different materials in the plate, such as Aluminum and Titanium, to see how this affects surface heat flux and maximum temperature on the plate.
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
Post a picture of the new grid.
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
I did coarsen the grid and customize the computational domain more. I got a simulation time of about 20 minutes on my 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 laptop with 8gigs of ram. Due to time constraints on this endeavor it will have to do. Now that I know that a 24-hour simulation is not unheard of I am more confident that I am not making a huge mistake somewhere.
I am going to try modeling a large wind tunnel around my parts and run the simulation with internal instead of external flow. I am curious to see if this will reduce the time even more. If so I can use a finer mesh for more accuracy.
I will post results and pictures of the new model.
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
I am curious as to whether FloWorks is using multiple processors on your system.
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
The wind tunnel is working better. The min/max table is not showing me unrealistically high mach numbers or low temperatures anymore. Previously there would be certain cells with mach 5 air flow or temperatures way lower than they should be.
Also, I only care about heat flux on the panel. It seems like I don't need to worry about eddies forming downstream from the panel. Does that sound right?
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
I have a Hex Core cpu and when I watch task manager doing surfacing only four cores are used at any one time. PhotoWorks uses all cores. Many SW functions use one core. The task manager will show one window for each core. There is some question about how many processors various parts of Simulation will use.
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
Windows should only show two processors.
Just switching to a Sandy Bridge would triple your speed (3.8/2.8*4/2) if you could go to desktop. For a big run this is nothing to sneeze at. 20 minute run down to 7 minutes. 24 hour run to overnight.
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
So to summarize:
Reduce computational domain
Coarsen mesh/grid in areas that don't need refinement
Use internal flow
and
potentially upgrade hardware.
About beat this to death.
TOP
CSWP, BSSE
www.engtran.com www.niswug.org
www.linkedin.com/in/engineeringtransport
"Node news is good news."
RE: Need help reducing simulation time
Coarsen mesh/grid in areas that don't need refinement
Use internal flow"
Done.
"potentially upgrade hardware."
Sadly I'm too poor for that at the moment. Thanks for all the help!