Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
(OP)
This question is regarding all Shape Studio edits done in NX7.5. Previously, we were able to do XForm, MatchEdge, RefitFace to name a few, to unparameterized sheets, non feature based. In which the sheet modified would still stay unparameterized. That doesn't seem to be the case in NX7.5. It automatically puts a feature in the part navigator history tree. This is something I DON'T WANT! The reason I do the un-associated edits to MINIMIZE the feature count in my Class "A" models and for ease of editing. Any comments would be appreciated, as I looked fairly deep into the Customer Defaults to see if there was an over-ride to no avail. Any input John Baker?.....





RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
This is the same as in previous versions but it may be the preference has been set the opposite to the past.
Anthony Galante

Senior Support Engineer
NX4.0.4MP10, NX5.0.0->5.0.6, NX6.0.0->NX6.0.5, NX7.0.0->NX7.0.1 & NX7.5.0.32-> NX7.5.2.5, Beta NX8.0.0.15
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
Anthony Galante

Senior Support Engineer
NX4.0.4MP10, NX5.0.0->5.0.6, NX6.0.0->NX6.0.5, NX7.0.0->NX7.0.1 & NX7.5.0.32-> NX7.5.2.5, Beta NX8.0.0.15
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
In it there are two sheet bodies as well as an intersect curve between them.
I can maniuplate both sheets using the freeform edit tools and the intersect curve will update without a new edit feature being created.
If I turn on the assocaitive freeform edit and the manipulate, the intersect curve doesn't update (as it's before the edit). If I delete the x-form feature, if I then try and xform edit unassociatively it warns me about the parameters.
Undo back to before the associative xform and the edits work as I expect.
Used winrar to compress the video file.
Anthony Galante

Senior Support Engineer
NX4.0.4MP10, NX5.0.0->5.0.6, NX6.0.0->NX6.0.5, NX7.0.0->NX7.0.1 & NX7.5.0.32-> NX7.5.2.5, Beta NX8.0.0.15
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
Anthony Galante

Senior Support Engineer
NX4.0.4MP10, NX5.0.0->5.0.6, NX6.0.0->NX6.0.5, NX7.0.0->NX7.0.1 & NX7.5.0.32-> NX7.5.2.5, Beta NX8.0.0.15
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
What I would suggest is to record a video (using the NX7.5 move record function) in NX5 and again in NX7.5 showing the exact same procedure (even use the same part).
Log it to GTAC as a regression from NX5 and because you have the videos showing the difference, it should be treated as a regeression and would more than liekly get fixed.
Anthony Galante

Senior Support Engineer
NX4.0.4MP10, NX5.0.0->5.0.6, NX6.0.0->NX6.0.5, NX7.0.0->NX7.0.1 & NX7.5.0.32-> NX7.5.2.5, Beta NX8.0.0.15
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
Then you can record anything, not just the NX you are in. Then you can use NX5 and switch to NX7.5 in the one video.
Anthony Galante

Senior Support Engineer
NX4.0.4MP10, NX5.0.0->5.0.6, NX6.0.0->NX6.0.5, NX7.0.0->NX7.0.1 & NX7.5.0.32-> NX7.5.2.5, Beta NX8.0.0.15
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
RE: Shape Studio edits in NX7.5.2.5
This would be a good topic for a new thread since it has nothing to do with the original question. That said, I'm not sure what 'curve intersecting' means. Perhaps you mean face intersection or self-intersection?