×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Reduction in roof live loads

Reduction in roof live loads

Reduction in roof live loads

(OP)
A co-worker and I were having a discussion on reductions in roof live loads and the appropriate tributary areas to use.  If I have 8' o.c. trusses on a 60' wide building, the tributary area for the truss is 480sf.  For live load, using 480sf, I calculate a reduction factor R1 = .72.  That is very simple.  However, when I look at the reaction that the truss places on an isolated column, I tend to think that I must use a live load reduction of .96 since my tributary area is now 240sf.  Is that correct?

Assuming that is correct, how then do I look at the reactions from the truss on a girder that is 30' long?  Is the tributary area that I use to determine my R1 for the concentrated loads at 8' o.c. on the girder equal to 1/2 the building width multiplied by:

1.  Girder length of 30'?
2.  Actual tributary width of roof carried by the girder?
3.  Truss spacing of 8'?
4.  Other??

It makes a huge difference how you look at it, and I'd appreciate some perspectives on this.

Thanks.

RE: Reduction in roof live loads

You should use the tributary area of the member being designed to calculate live load reductions for the design of that particular member, not the tributary area of each member delivering the load to that member (so every beam, truss, column, etc has its on live load reduction factor for design, you don't reduce the live load on a beam and then carry that reduced live load to the girder and then the column and so forth - you run the full unreduced live load through to the foundation, then reduce the forces for each member based on that members tributary or effective area).  

So the answer to your question is 2.   

RE: Reduction in roof live loads

I agree with Willis...

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Reduction in roof live loads

In the NBC, neither snow load nor minimum roof live load can be reduced based on tributary area.  For floor members, I agree with WillisV.

BA

RE: Reduction in roof live loads

Willis is correct IMO.  

RE: Reduction in roof live loads

(OP)
Thank you all for your thoughts.  I appreciate the advice!!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources