×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pressure vessel design reality check

Pressure vessel design reality check

Pressure vessel design reality check

(OP)
Hi everyone,

I am looking for a quick reality check.  I have some background in pressure vessel design, but we always used APV for calcs, and only worked up to 150 psi.  Well I have had a friend ask me to design a one off filter unit for him, to handle 5000 psi, and was hoping to get a quick look over my wall thickness calcs.

I am using the formula t=p*Ro/(Stress allowable + 0.5p)

Using 5000 psi
3.5" OD
SS 316 with a UTS of 80,000psi
FOS 4

I am getting 0.389" wall thickness.

Can anyone comment on my calcs and let me know if I'm making sense?

Thanks,
Jim

RE: Pressure vessel design reality check

Jimbo....

When I use the rules for B31.1/B31.3 piping design, with an allowable stress of 20,000 (no corrosion/threading allowance  etc) I get almost the same number.

Why are you not using the rules of ASME VIII ?

   

RE: Pressure vessel design reality check

Your calulation result is correct. However, if you use pipe (based on 3.5" OD you used), you need to add 12.5% undertolerance.

If you use ASME Div 1, the forumla to use shall be the one for heavy wall. However that does not change the results much.

RE: Pressure vessel design reality check

(OP)
Thanks guys.

MJ, I'm not using Sec VIII, because I am no longer working in the pressure vessel industry and don't have a copy of it.  Also, this being a one off design, that isn't being used for commercial use, or being sold, I have no requirement to follow any specific code.  It's for a scuba compressor, and most other HP air products I have dealt with have used 4:1 FOS, so I felt pretty comfortable with that, especially being made from SS, rather than the aluminum that most filter housings are made, I am not too worried about sustained load cracking or fatigue..

James, you are correct it is based on pipe, and I am looking to use 3" XXH which has an OD of 3.5" and wall thickness of 0.6", so there is plenty of room for tolerance issues.  I am planning to thread the pipe internally, and turn SS end plugs using O-Ring seals, and obviously use the correct OPV and associated plumbing.

RE: Pressure vessel design reality check

Would have been easier to check ratings of pipe using a good Pipe Spec.  Sch 160 s/s is more than adequate for 5000 psig. XXS may be hard to find, and is 'overkill', as your calc's have shown.

RE: Pressure vessel design reality check

I suspect scuba gear might use a lower factor of safety than Section VIII pressure vessels.

RE: Pressure vessel design reality check

(OP)
You may be right, there is virtually no welded seam pressure vessels in the scuba industry.  Everything I've seen has been seamless with O-ring seals.

I think I will continue with my design using Sched 160.  I had originally thought XXS might be good, because I have to thread the tube, and it is being used in a moisture separator so it will have the potential for corrosion as well.

Jim

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources