×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ROHS in Drawing title

ROHS in Drawing title

ROHS in Drawing title

(OP)
Is it acceptable to include ROHS in a drawing title?  My company is proposing to include ROHS as part of the drawing title on all ROHS compliant items.  The reasoning for this is to enable drawing users to know if the item is ROHS compliant just by looking at the drawing title.  My thinking is that it doesn't conform to standard naming conventions.  If we decide to include ROHS in the drawing title I just know that some brainiac will also want to know if it is CE marked and/or UL listed.  Your opinions will be greatly appreciated.  Thank you in advance.  

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

Dumbing down of engineering.  Gotta love it.

Put a note right by the title block.  Include a ROHS property in CAD files.

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

(OP)
Currently we have a lengthy general note stating that the materials used shall be ROHS requirements, package marking requirements, certificate of compliance and declaration of compliance statement inclusions.  IMHO that is sufficient.  The attempt here is to enable people scanning a database to see that the part is ROHS compliant without ever having to see the drawing.  

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

If putting it in the title block really helps the drawing's 'customers', it might be okay. But your design policies should specifically allow and describe what the "RoHS" tag relates to. Also, the placement in the title block should be audited to be sure it is always there when it should be and never there when it shouldn't be. There is probably a better way. I would suggest an internal  Standard which is referenced in the drawing notes. Let Quality or Operations figure out how they will ensure that the physical parts meet all design specifications. Your policy might read something like: "If the abbreviation 'RoHS' must appear in the title of the design document, the design must comply with XYZ Design Standard DS-12345." The Standard might need to be owned by another group in the organization for regulatory or corporate structure reasons.

Peter Truitt
Minnesota

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

Let me say this another way: The design documents should not be process-oriented, if possible. So it is best if the design docs (perhaps with the help of internal Design Standards) can just state what external Standards or regulations need to be met. That way the design package is portable and stands on its own. Leave it up to Quality or Operations to evolve the leanest way to ensure that the physical parts meet all of the design requirements without impacting the design package. Design changes are especially dangerous in a regulated environment.

Peter Truitt
Minnesota

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

Is there asbestos in any of your products?  Do you include "Asbestos Free" in the title?

Is there lead in your products?  Do you include "Lead Free" in the title?

A drawing title should identify what something it, not what it isn't.

Add a field in the title block for RoHS compliance.



 

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

ptruitt,

   RoHS is not a process.  It is a requirement you must meet.  The thought of seeing RoHS in every drawing title appalls me, but I do not think the concept violates anything.  

   RoHS in the title is not just information for the end user.  If the fabricated part is labeled as RoHS compliant, engineering must not change the finish to a hexavalent chromium chemical film like yellow Alodine, for example.

   This may come down to office politics, and the OP's confidence in his coworkers.  Will they read note_3 before they modify the drawing, or do they need to be bludgeoned over the head by the drawing title?
    

               JHG

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

drawoh,

I guess my words were confusing. I agree that RoHS is not a process. My concern is that the design requirements might start specifying processes such as how to handle getting certs from suppliers. (I have seen this happen.) I know that the suppliers will need to supply certs, but I would rather see the logistics of handling the certs handled by QA or Operations and avoid the temptation to spell that out in design documents.

Hopefully, firebirds will find a lean and effective way to handle this without putting 'RoHS' into the title.

 

Peter Truitt
Minnesota

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

I would not list RoHS on any engineering drawing, it has nothing to do with machining a part. You may create an engineering document (Performance Spec, Quality Doc, etc) that may indicate it. This document may be included on a top level BOM, or parts list.
If RoHS is included on each part drawing, expect the cost to go up.

Chris
SolidWorks 10 SP4.0
ctopher's home
SolidWorks Legion

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

ctopher,

    RoHS does not affect the machining process itself.  It does affect materials like beryllium, and finishes like hexavalent chromium chemical films.  If RoHS compliance is a necessary part of the functionality of a fabricated part, there are ways to make it non-compliant.

               JHG

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

You may need to take another look at the issue, Chris. Someone needs to ask Marketing if RoHS compliance is a design requirement. If it is, the Design Product Specification should list it as one of the characteristics of the design that is non-interchangeable. The question then is how to ensure that the requirement is met. In the end, your company's legal council will probably dictate that it is referenced in some manner on each drawing that has any possibility of violating RoHS. But if you can come up with a lean and effective way of ensuring that the design is efficacious, go for it. Although complying with RoHS will probably add cost, design requirements always do. Fortunately, new methods are being developed to meet RoHS and the increase will be somewhat minimized. The fact that you made your comment indicates that you had better get to the bottom of whether or not your designs need to be RoHS compliant and if it does, is legal council satisfied that your approach will keep the company out of court. Putting this off will only increase the pain.

Peter Truitt
Minnesota

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

Chris... If your recommendation of adding documents to BoMs to address RoHS has been reviewed by legal council and satisfies them, I would like to know that. I does seem like a lean approach. But it seems as though all of your other policies and practices would need to be extremely robust and have a long history of passing audits that demonstrate compliance. All supplier would need to know if RoHS is a design requirement, or not.

Peter Truitt
Minnesota

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

Exactly fcsuper.

Maybe you have 'CIRCUIT CARD ASSY, MOTOR CONTROL' and you have the new RoHS compliant 'CIRCUIT CARD ASSY, MOTOR CONTROL, ROHS'.

Off the top of my head I don't think it violates ASME Y14.100 naming conventions and achieves the aim.

Posting guidelines FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm? (probably not aimed specifically at you)
What is Engineering anyway: FAQ1088-1484: In layman terms, what is "engineering"?

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

I don't see anything wrong with fcsuper's recommendation, but where I have worked, RoHS would now be in all but about two titles. We have affixed verbiage regarding RoHS to all of our drawing templates. But that is not perfect, either: RoHS requirements are evolving. Savy suppliers will wonder what level of RoHS we need. There is no easy answer. It may be best to just run a recommendation by the higher-ups. If they will be accountable for the approach, go with that. But it might be good to review your approach periodically if you are in a very regulated industry without a regulatory affairs department responsible for keeping tabs on RoHS.

Peter Truitt
Minnesota

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

If you just need people to be able to scan the database and determine RoHS compliance, why not put a RoHS field into the database?  Faster and easier to scan than a title.  I don't think putting it in the titleblock is against any standard, but there's an easier way to accomplish your stated objective.

RE: ROHS in Drawing title

(OP)
Thank you one and all for your comments.  You have confirmed my thinking that this is something that doesn't violate any documentation standards but there are far better ways to handle the issue.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources