×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

type 409 versus type 321 for Ht. Exchanger Application

type 409 versus type 321 for Ht. Exchanger Application

type 409 versus type 321 for Ht. Exchanger Application

(OP)
In the comparison of these two stainless steels, is it accurate to say that although the type 409 has a lower coefficient of expansion then 321, for the ht. exchanger application the 321 is still superior because of the addition fo Ni gives it greater strength at elevated temperatures?  

RE: type 409 versus type 321 for Ht. Exchanger Application

Yes for high temperature applications 321 is always better than 409 grade. This is because of the presence of high amounts of Nickel which imparts this superior properties.

Dr Arun Rao

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources