×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PRV sizing for a gas blow-by scenario

PRV sizing for a gas blow-by scenario

PRV sizing for a gas blow-by scenario

(OP)
I am trying to validate the sizing case for an existing PRV located at the top of the column which is located downstream the depicted system (please see attached sketch).
The sizing case of the PRV is the gas blow-by through the depicted drum (an HP  separator in a naphtha hydrotreating unit). In the event of level loss, the incoming gas passes through the bottom outlet and enters the column (stripper), which makes the PRV at the top of the column to open.
There is also an ESDV at the bottom exit of HP separator which is activated (closed) when the level of the drum is very low (interlock system).
However, in my oppinion, the described scenario (gas blow-by) occurs due to a double failure: fail at level control loop and also a fail of the interlock system.
In this case, shall the gas blow-by scenario be taken into account on the sizing of the PRV at the stripper column ? Is there a SIL classification of the IS which allows us not to consider this scenario ?

We appreciate any advice.
 

RE: PRV sizing for a gas blow-by scenario

This is how I would approach the problem. I'll admit not all professionals view the solution as I.
It is credible for the IS to fail. This is the single contingency.
If so, you should not take credit for favorable action by the control valve.
Try to determine the precontingency control valve opening (normal-average flow).
Then calculate the gas blowthru at the reduced CV opening.
The overall impact is the gas blowthru will be less than 100% CV open. So the IS does reduce the potential safety impact.

RE: PRV sizing for a gas blow-by scenario

You need to consider that scenario in your PHA and determinate the risk level in case of over pressure. The SIL will be determinate in function of the risk level.

You can do a LOPA analysis and to determinate if is necessary  the PRV or not according to PFD (probability of failure on demand of the DCS controller and safety interlock)and the frequency of the overpressure scenario.

RE: PRV sizing for a gas blow-by scenario

you need the MAOP of the drum and MAOP of the Stripper  The difference is the differential pressure across the valve.  Then use the Valves Cv to get the gas flow through the valve.  That mass/ volume is another design point for the PSV on the stripper.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources