×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

2.5" socket weld connections

2.5" socket weld connections

2.5" socket weld connections

(OP)
When the electric utlity plants I work with were built (60's, 70's, 80's), the original engineering construction firms, two different ones, used construction specifications that did not allow high pressure (2000-2900psi), high temperature (1005F) socket welding over 2". B16.11 is acceptable to use for fittings up to 4" and B16.34 is good for class 4500 valves up to 2.5".

Why did these engineering firms stop short of what is allowed by these specifications? Is there an industry standard or knowledge I'm unaware of and if so, has it changed recently to meet the current specifications? Any thoughts?

Thank you,
Metalhoo

RE: 2.5" socket weld connections

metalhoosier,

Try this;
Contact your local pipe and fitting supplier and ask for a price quote for:
(1) a 4" butt weld 90 degree elbow

(2) a 4" Socket Weld 90 degree elbow

 

RE: 2.5" socket weld connections

hoosier...

You do realize that socket welds on piping are inherently less strong than full penetration welds. ASME B31.1 doe not allow them on certain flammable/toxic services.

Additionally, there comes a point with high- pressure rated (Class 9000 ?) socketwelded fittings where the required fillet weld becomes huge for the service. Butt welds are a better choice.

   

RE: 2.5" socket weld connections

When you deal with the various ASME codes, piping and vessel, you will find that they don't always agree.

I questioned an esteemed forum member who is on one of the ASME committees about that recently; specifically why they can't all get on the same page and he likened it to herding cats.

You have to go with the code that dictates your design.

For the situation you described, it was most probably B31.1.

Remember too that in the day that those plants were built, there was more regulation than now and power companies made money on how expensively they could build plants.  The percentage return on investment was regulated, but the amount invested wasn't.

Therefore things may have been done differently for reasons not appearant now days.

rmw

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources