×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

(OP)
We are designing a large swimming pool, for lack of a better description, where the walls of the pool are a fabric membrane that contains the fluid. The pool is on the order of 10' deep. Without going into the specifics of what the supporting structure is, I'm having nightmares about solving membrane problem. The membrane is wrapped around a support at the pool base and pool top. The membrane goes over these top and bottom supports, turns a 90 degree turn, and is then attached to a "fixed" support. Directly between these two top and bottom points is a roller, that prevents the membrane from bowing out in one big bulge. With the roller, it now bows out in two varying sized bulges.

The supports are steel pipes that span between larger, primary structure.

I have attached a sketch to clarify.

I am trying to size the supports (top, roller and bottom)without buying a non geometric linearity FEA modeling program, or by performing matrix analysis. Any suggestions on how to simplify this, or a hint on a cheap cable modeling program would be great.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

Interesting problem.  It looks as though your top bulge is much too big relative to the bottom one.  As you fill the tank with water, the bottom bulge will grow outward.  When water level reaches the midpoint roller, there will be no bulge in the top.  The fabric will be undeflected in the upper half but will be carrying considerable tension.

As you continue filling the upper half, the membrane tension will increase, reducing the lower bulge and increasing the upper one.  If the middle support is a true roller, the vertical component of the fabric tension will be constant over the 10' height.  The bending moment in the fabric is zero everywhere, so it assumes the shape of the moment curve for two simple spans.  

As a starting point, you could assume concentrated horizontal loads at, say one foot intervals.  Each load would be simply 62.5z where z is the depth of the load.  Then you would find the funicular polygon corresponding to that load pattern and finally, you could correct for vertical pressure on each segment using an iterative solution.

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

There is software out there like ForTen 3000 (also 2000, now a 4000 beta version) to efficiently deal with tensile structures.

http://www.forten32.com/

However even if fantastically suited for some typologies may fall short of each and every situation, shape and restraints, and considerations like those of BAretired above are well placed.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

This is one of those problems that cannot be simplified and needs to be analysed properly and in 3 dimensions. The final equilibrium state of the fabric can be vastly different from initial estimates.

Get the software or pass it on to someone who knows what they are doing with these things!

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

Actually, you could make a very simple analysis to get some idea of the bulging involved.  A triangular load has virtually the same maximum moment as a uniform load, 0.128WL vs 0.125WL where W represents the total load.

Since the fabric must follow the moment diagram to some scale, the bulge (or lateral deflection) in the upper half will be approximately 2.5 as compared with 7.5 for the lower half, i.e. 1/3 of the deflection of the lower half.

The magnitude of the deflection depends on how much slack was in the fabric to begin with and how much the fabric stretches to accommodate the tension.

If the pool is rectangular, there will be special effects occurring at the corners and the fabric in the sketch may be stretched in two directions, depending on the detail used at the corners.

As for the precise shape of the bending moment diagram, it is not too important.  

Personally, I prefer rigid walls for the pool.  If the fabric tears anywhere, the whole area is flooded.

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

This is interesting. I don't see how bending moment gets into this, the vertical strips will act like a catenary except that the pressure diagram is triangular and the pressure is normal to the slope. There will be a big bulge at the bottom and a small one at the top, but the tension will be uniform for the height except for the effect of the fabric's own weight. The plan shape needs elucidation, as BA said corners produce special effects.

If it is circular, the main stress in the vertical strands may be considerably relieved by the hoop stress in the horizontal strands.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

(OP)
They make fabric that will not tear. Additional safety liners will be used as well. The bulges will be well below the elastic limit. The efficiency of tensile structures compared to plate structures is not even close. For instance the weight of the fabric for the entire pool will be in the range of 500lbs. If I used cladding, it would be nearly 25 x heavier than this. Add in cost of assembly, portability etc. and tensile fabric is the way to go.

And in response to cd72, every problem can be simplified, as that is really the basis of all engineering in general. Fortunately I am the one who will be figuring this out, so no, I will not be outsourcing this. And no, I am not against others opinions and help, which is why I am here using this wonderful resource.

The problem is 2D, not 3D. The fabric is not warping, it is bowing, meaning it is only supported by the top, mid and bottom members....not side supports. The reason we can do this is because this fabric is the "structure" and a more stretchy, waterproof liner will go OVER this, covering all nooks and crannys.

Finding the furnicular polygon corresponding to the load pattern is easier said than done. You are 100% correct BAretired in saying that stretch and intial pretension will effect the deflected shape. The corners are an altogether different animal that is beyond this post.

The precise shape of the deflection is paramount, as the combination of tensile forces as the membrane goes over the pipe will be a direct function of this. This shape is a function of the stress. There is no bending moment, i.e the nature of a tension structure. Those tensile forces will give me the load on the purlins. In essence I am magnifying the load on the purlins when the fabric wraps them.

The other twist to this problem, like some of you have mentioned is that there is are two load scenarios: loading/unloading, and filled.

 

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

paddingtongreen,

I am assuming that the deflections are relatively small so that pressures are fundamentally horizontal.  The profile of the fabric when loaded, is identical to the shape of the bending moment diagram, to some scale.  This can be calculated as precisely as you wish.  

The weight of fabric is neglected.

If the correction for the sloping component of pressure is to be included, that could be an iterative procedure.  A closed form solution may be possible, but that would take a bit more thought.  

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

bigmig,

The magnitude of purlin reactions is available from statics.  Tension in the fabric is not required in order to calculate them.  The upper purlin, for example carries a reaction of W/3 where W is the total horizontal pressure in the upper half, namely 25γ/2 per unit of length.

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

BAretired, I'm assuming that the fabric has no rigidity as shown in bigmig's sketch. If this is true, and if the fabric is tight, there will be large vertical components of the tension at the top and bottom. The more slack the fabric, the smaller the vertical component. With a roller in the middle, the fabric will do the analog of "running through the sheaves" that can happen on transmission and distribution lines on slopes and on long/short spans.

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

(OP)
BAretired,

The freebody on the purlin suggests otherwise. The fabric acts like a block and tackle, magnifying the load on the purlin, which is a direct result of tension and fabric angle.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

Neglecting the vertical component of pressure and the weight of the fabric and assuming that the middle support is a frictionless roller, the vertical component of tension V in the fabric is M/d where M is the maximum moment and d is the maximum deflection in a span .  V is constant throughout both spans.

So V = M/d or d = M/V

W(upper) = 2.5*5*62.5 = 781#/'
M(upper) = 0.128*781*5 = 500'#/'

W(lower) = 7.5*5*62.5 = 2344#/'
M(lower) = 0.125*2344*5 = 1465'#/'

d(upper) = 500/V and d(lower) = 1465/V

If V = 2000#/' then d(upper) = 0.25' = 3" and d(lower) = 0.732' = 8.8"

The maximum tension in the fabric will be slightly greater than V and will occur where the slope from a vertical plane is maximum.

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

I bought some months ago the Flügge book Stresses in Shells and was a good moment again to feel the lack of a more sound mathematical preparation. Our world is different today, most of us simply seem not have the time for that thing. But it is an spectacle to see those commandeering the thing reduce the problems to elegant solutions of differential equations' problems.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

ishvaaag,

I have had a copy of "Stresses in Shells" by Wilhelm Flügge for nearly fifty years.  I do not use it often, but there are times when it is extremely valuable.  I'm not aware of any chapter which deals with this problem, however.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

BAretired, no problem with your solution until:
"The maximum tension in the fabric will be slightly greater than V and will occur where the slope from a vertical plane is maximum."

The tension is constant by definition, the curvature is due to an increasing horizontal component (horizontal shear) and smaller "V" (the curve is not quite parabolic).

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

paddington,

The tension is not constant.  The vertical component of the tension is constant.

Consider a weightless cable suspended between two hinged supports at the same elevation with gravity load P applied at distance 'a' from each support and distance 'b' between loads.  

The vertical reaction at each support is P.  The horizontal reaction at each support is Pa/h where h is the sag in the cable.  The tension in the horizontal portion of length b is Pa/h but the tension in the sloping part is P√(1 + (a/h)2) which is greater than Pa/h.

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

Putting it frankly, this is not a smart design; you need to support the membrane throughout its depth and circunference of the pool. Even a small crack will bulge the membrane unless it is several inch thick.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

chicopee,

You can put it as frankly as you wish...it may or may not not be a smart design, but your comment that "you need to support the membrane throughout the depth and circumference of the pool" is wrong.   

Your final sentence is a mystery.  The membrane will bulge as a result of pressure.  It is not related to cracking or thickness.

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

The membrane appears thin in his drawing and will buldge between gaps if uprights are spaced around the pool. He needs a continuous wall or support whether of metal, wood, sand etc... Plus the fact that when kids use the pool this membrane will fail quickly.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

chicopee,
Membranes are usually thin.  There are no uprights spaced around the pool.  The proposed supports are shown on the OP's sketch. A continuous wall is not required to satisfy statics.  Why will the membrane fail quickly when kids use the pool?  What happens when adults use the pool?  What exactly are you saying?

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

(OP)
BAretired, thanks for your efforts on this problem. I think that ignoring the vertical component is too conservative. As the membrane reaches the support, it may be totally horizontal, meaning you would be ignoring 100% of the load at this location.

In addition the vertical component is not constant, which is why the membrane forms a curve. A free body at any segment of the membrane in the curved area shows widely varying vertical and horizontal vectors. The vector addition of each of these comes up with a similar tension in the entire system which may increase when load is added to it, but is the same amount from end to end.

chicopee, the entire concept is that the membrane DOES bulge.

A better way to look at things is to make the following conservative assumptions:

1. The water column load is rectangular, not triangular, so the curve is a perfect arch with equal water pressures normal to the surface. The load on each bay would be the average water pressure. The statics for this problem are straightforward.

2. The membrane will stretch under load, pretensioning the upper bay. The stretch will change the deflected shape and tensions through-out. An iteration would find this.

3. The membrane will slip over the middle sheave, changing the deflected shape and tensions throughout until equilibrium is achieved. Another iteration would find this.

4. Leverage effects will multiply loads on the top and bottom purlins by a factor of upto 2x (assumes membrane bows so far, that it creates a hairpin shape over the top and bottom rollers. Since the final deflected shape is unknown, I can assume the worst case (factor of 2) for preliminary design.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

(OP)
BAretired,

Sorry for the confusion in my latest reply....what I meant to say was that ignoring the vertical component would lead to portions of the curve being ignored at the VERTICAL surface, not the horizontal.
Sorry again.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

bigmig,

I was not suggesting that the vertical components of pressure be ignored in the final analysis...only as a first approximation.

When pressure is applied normal to the surface of the membrane in its deflected position, the membrane will be in pure tension throughout its length as noted by paddingtongreen.  But without knowing the size of the bulge, the vertical component of pressure acts on an unknown area.

Just as a point of interest, why not eliminate the middle support and introduce one single bulge from top to bottom?  The tension could be controlled by varying the initial amount of slack in the membrane.

BA

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

The middle support will significantly reduce the tension in the membrane. However, it should not be in the middle but 1/3 span up from the bottom. The fabric in these membranes can have a higher tensile strength than steel.

http://www.splashpools.com/Splash_Pools_Manuals.asp

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

(OP)
Compositepro is right. As soon as we eliminate the middle support the fabric drapes steeply, increasing the force on the top and bottom purlins. The increases are substantial.

BAretired, by assuming and equal pressure distribution over a span (average pressure at the depth of the span) we know the bulge, and the tension in the membrane based on the elasticity properties of the membrane (given in the manufacturer's cut sheet).

The problem I have now is that the bulge is a function of elasticity, AND membrane translation as it slides over the middle support. Both of which change the geometry and therefore the tension. The entire process iterates to stability. We built a real life model this weekend to better understand it. Now I just have to find a methodolgy that iterates elasticity and translation simultaneously and I will have it solved.

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

I am a little confused with your post, it seem that you are looking at a liner pool which are not very common but for example in Miami, fl the biggest pool 500,000 gal is a liner pool. There are system already in the market for liner pools. Why are you starting  for cero... I am a Florida resgisted PE and a CPC which is a Commercial Pool Contractor...

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

Interesting post.  I provide some food for thought, but no answers here:

Fabric is not a perfect membrane, it has two directions of orthogonality.

About halfway down this page is picture of a freestanding membrane pool that doesn't require purlins for support:

http://sites.google.com/site/grandmaisonavendre/

Partly because the shape is circular (and the shape of the sidewall is controlled by the cut of the fabric), and partly because the top of the pool is a float.

This page (below) shows a system like what the OP is describing, but without a center support purlin.

Both show a differing degree of bulge.  One would presume that the degree of bulging is due to differences in supports, and also the degree to which the distribution of stress (laterally vs. vertically) is engineered into the fabric.   

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

(OP)
fmorales: My pool is 10' deep, holds 500,000 barrels, 300' across and can be assembled and disassembled in only a couple days. If you know of a liner company that can hold that, and a PE to back it up I would love to see their website. What are the specifications on the type of liner you use? Have you ever built a liner pool with a 10' head using that liner?

 

RE: Tension only Structure with Hydrostatic Loads

A pool liner and a tension membrane are two entirely different things.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources