×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Assemblies and ref sets

Assemblies and ref sets

Assemblies and ref sets

(OP)
I am on NX6.
Can the same component be shown twice in an assembly, but with differnt ref sets?

RE: Assemblies and ref sets

Why do you have 2 refsets that show diferent configurations?
Use arrangements to show configurations, not refsets.

Since the refset name is selected from the component file, you should be able to show them both. They would only load that way if your system settings don't specify a named refset. But using refets for configuration is not their designed intent and arrangements would be the better tool.
 

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli

RE: Assemblies and ref sets

The direct answer to your original question is, YES, you can add two (or more) different Reference Sets defined in the same part file into the same Assembly.

HOWEVER, as Ben has already mentioned, IF you're doing this in order to show the same sub-assembly multiple times, each with different content or with it's internal components in different positions, then STOP RIGHT NOW!!!  This is what you should be using Arrangements for as they were designed specifically for this task.  We can NOT recommend strongly enough that if this IS what you're attempting to do that you NOT pursue this 'Ref Set' approach, PERIOD!  If you continue you are on your own and you can expect little or no sympathy from anyone associated with NX nor will anyone be receptive to providing new capabilities to make what you're attempting to do more usable.  We have a recommended solution, please use it.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: Assemblies and ref sets

I saw this thread and was intrigued since I have used ref. sets to depict non-assembly comonents in different configurations. Mostly cases, cabinets, and/or enclosures that have doors or lids that need to be shown open or closed to view the interior components. These cases, cabinets and/or enclosures are not assemblies since for the most part they are purchased parts.

I have to admit it sounds like Arrangements will not work in this example, but since I have never used them before I had to look into them.

RE: Assemblies and ref sets

Just becasue something is purchased doesn't mean it would not be advantageous to model them as assemblies, if for no other reason than because you could then leverage things like Arrangements, Assembly Sequencing, etc.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Design Solutions
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
http://www.siemens.com/plm
http://www.plmworld.org/museum/

To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 

RE: Assemblies and ref sets

I have done a few panels or enclosures before where if they are a single part file on import from the vendor then I delete or copy and paste the solid bodies from one part into another.  So I might cut the door solid body and paste in a new file and save it as the door.  Then I create an assembly with the door and the rest of the solid and apply an assembly arrangements door open and door closed.

RE: Assemblies and ref sets

Sometimes it does work to your advantage to create an assembly from an imported single piece file.
We used to get engine assembly files and go the opposite way. The engine would come to use as multiple components, depending on the options selected. We could end up with 4-7 different, yet very similat engines each with their own components even though 80%+ were common. To make it easier in our system, we converted the assembly file into a single part file outside the PDM system so we only had to handle 1 file inside the PDM.
 

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources