×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

(OP)
This is on a sparking rod. The current travels along a steel rod that is .093" that is threaded at the end with #3-56 threads.... then that rod is threaded into a little brass button.

The company was using loctite 262 (red loctite) on the threads between those 2 items... seemed to work ok but 262 is an insulator. Loctite 3888 is a conductive threadlocker. Do you think the conductive loctite is necessary? The threads are about 3/8" in length so I figured that the metal on metal contact would provide enough surface area as the .093" rod and the loctite 262 would seal the area and protect from corrosion....

I definately think the 3888 would be more suited for this application, but my REAL question is: do you think it would make any difference using the 3888?

I already tried Hinkel(loctite) tech service but the tech guy did not seem to know the answer to this unfortunately.

Thanks for any ideas.  

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

If there's any axial load on the thread while the Loctite is setting, i.e. if there's a jam nut or a shoulder, conductive Loctite is unnecessary because one thread flank will be in intimate contact, and the Loctite will just fill the gap to the other thread flank.

The issue is covered in a Loctite FAQ somewhere, so I'm surprised the Henkel guy didn't know about it.  Maybe he's new.  Ask an _old_ Loctite guy for confirmation.



 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

(OP)
There is no axial load... the pieces are put together so the only load would just be from the very very small weight of the brass piece.... but I still imagine enough thread contact... what do you think about that?  

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

I think assembly and (undisturbed) cure in a gravity field would assure some contact between the metallic parts when cure is reached, even without a preload other than the parts' weight.



 

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

The fact that conductive Loctite 3888 exists indicates that there is probably a requirement for it, at least in certain cases.

Grab a DVOM and see if there is continuity.

 

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

It might be fine if you never have to adjust or remove it.  If it is disturbed there will be barrier sections left in the threads. This could become an issue with higher currents. Conductive would minimize that risk.

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

"Sparker rod" = part of an electric igniter, say for a gas  burner?

Typical spark voltages in air are in the 10's of kVolts.  As IRstuff noted, the dielectric strength of the loctites are in the 10's of kV per mm.  So, unless you have a gap in your threaded assembly bigger than 1mm (and I'd bet you have minimum gaps measurable in nanometers or less, as Mike says), you can likely pass the required voltage thru any films of loctite that might get made accidentaly - they break down on the first or second try of the ignition coil, carbonize, and conduct just fine from then on.

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

That would be my expectation also.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

I never assume anything.  I TIG weld with electrodes thinner than that and pump a lot of amps.  General questions get a general answer. I think we should all think of the next guy to touch something before we glop stuff on a connection.

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

(OP)
Its funny you say that because the wire is a tig wire... just used for a different purpose. smile

We have been using the loctite 262 without any noticable complications... the loctite 3888 is multiple times more expensive because of the silver, so I wanted to make sure there was nothing I was missing by using the 262... seems like the 262 will be fine. Thank you

RE: Thoughts on conductive loctite 3888 for threads with current passing

"I TIG weld with electrodes thinner than that and pump a lot of amps."

Right, no loctite on 89-amp cables/connectors is likely a good idea.  Typical welding voltage is in the single or low double digits, and without the voltage to punch holes in any films, you will not be able to pass current effectively.

An ignition coil or sparker passes milliamps of current (ok, maybe 10ths of amps, depends), but at high voltages.  Different end of the lever.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources