Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification
Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification
(OP)
I am writing/editing a specification for an ultrahigh purity nitrogen system for a series of adjoining class 100 clean rooms.
The project is a design build so there is an installing contractor on board.
I was given a standard specification (15481) to serve as the basis of my specification. I found a similar specification for a Sandia Labs project.
In the specification, there is a section that requires field flushing the piping whenever a cut is made to the pipe.
The pipe is to be flushed with an alcohol/DI water mix and blown dry with 0.01 micron nitrogen from a cryogenic source. The contractor is balking at this section since he feels, due to the nature of the installation, which has a main routing through the facility with branches to the individual rooms (all of which are in a clean room environment), requiring many field cuts - that it would not be possible to get the piping completely dry with the nitrogen.
Since there was the specification from Sandia, I am thinking that it might be possible to do this but I have no way of knowing if the Sandia contractor was held to this requirement in the specification. There is a section where the inspector/QC representative can make modifications.
I need to know if somebody has any experience with this type of work that could help me to determine if the requirement is valid and the contractor is just being lazy.
I have also posted this question on a clean room forum - but wanted to see if anybody here could help.
The project is a design build so there is an installing contractor on board.
I was given a standard specification (15481) to serve as the basis of my specification. I found a similar specification for a Sandia Labs project.
In the specification, there is a section that requires field flushing the piping whenever a cut is made to the pipe.
The pipe is to be flushed with an alcohol/DI water mix and blown dry with 0.01 micron nitrogen from a cryogenic source. The contractor is balking at this section since he feels, due to the nature of the installation, which has a main routing through the facility with branches to the individual rooms (all of which are in a clean room environment), requiring many field cuts - that it would not be possible to get the piping completely dry with the nitrogen.
Since there was the specification from Sandia, I am thinking that it might be possible to do this but I have no way of knowing if the Sandia contractor was held to this requirement in the specification. There is a section where the inspector/QC representative can make modifications.
I need to know if somebody has any experience with this type of work that could help me to determine if the requirement is valid and the contractor is just being lazy.
I have also posted this question on a clean room forum - but wanted to see if anybody here could help.





RE: Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification
RE: Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification
In my case where the contractor and I are on the same "team", he already has the job - he is questioning the requirements.
He has done specialty gases - just not in a semi conductor clean room environment. He can do the welding and other stuff - he is just questioning the requirment for the field flushing with the alcohol and DI and getting it dry enough for the work to be done with it in the clean room.
RE: Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification
RE: Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification
I don't like the design build philosophy because it, in my opinion, comprimises the design to maintain a construction cost the contractor has given. I always have to check with the contractor to see if what I am designing is within his bid budget.
The contractor I alluded to is a subcontractor the mechanical contractor has brought in to do this work since he isn't qualified for the work himself. The subcontractor has worked with electropolished stainless steel of the same quality as the specification. He has worked with gases much more agressive and sensitive as nitrogen - but has never run into the flushing requirement in the field.
In my opinion, my company is not really qualified to do this - but we are doing this project. We are also researching other engineers/companies, who are qualified to review the spec to help us to understand what is involved and where, if anywhere, the spec can be edited. We are also looking in a lot of other arenas for assistance. This was just one I was pursuing.
I have advised the same thing as your last statement - follow the spec unless somebody who has actually done it tells us different.
We'll see where it goes.
Thanks for the to the point comments.
RE: Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification
RE: Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification
Patricia Lougheed
******
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.
RE: Ultrahigh Purity Gas Specification