×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Support Beam - Residential

Support Beam - Residential

Support Beam - Residential

(OP)
I work mainly on concrete and steel commercial office building design and haven't had too much experience with residential single family homes, but how hard could it be, right :)

So, I was asked by a friend to review some preliminary architectural drawings that he is planning on using (eventually) for his home addition/remodeling.  Currently in the garage there is a existing steel pipe column supporting a two-span steel beam, 12'-2" +/- each span.  The far ends are supported by exterior CMU bearing walls (mostly above grade).  The steel beam supports the existing 2x10 floor joists for the kitchen.

My friend (and his architect) want to remove the pipe column and steel beam and replace with a stronger beam to span 24'-4", thereby having a column-free garage.  Obviously, there will be temporary shoring issues to deal with, but that aside my question is this:  if headroom is not an issue, is there much of a cost difference in going with a larger steel beam vs. an engineered wood product (glulam, LVL, I-joist, etc.)?

How does the decision of beam material effect the pocketing of the beam into the existing exterior CMU wall?  By this I mean, do I need to recommend dampproofing/waterproofing around the ends of the beam or anything else to prevent deterioration?

Any advice would be appreciated.

RE: Support Beam - Residential

A wood beam would slowly creep downward over time but for a garage roof probably negligible.

A wood beam would have to be supported on treated wood on the CMU to avoid moisture damage or rotting.

The removal of the column means that you will now be depositing around twice the original load on the CMU walls and thus on the footings below - could be a problem - you'd have to check both the wall stability, masonry bearing, and footing strength and sizes.

You'd have to price out steel vs. wood for your locale.





 

RE: Support Beam - Residential

You are asking a lot of questions in one thread.  Wood beams are deeper than steel beams as a result of their lower  modulus of elasticity.  Cost difference varies with location and several other factors.

Removing the central column is possible only if the remaining supports have adequate support to receive the larger load.

On the dampproofing/waterproofing issue, you should follow recommended procedures.

BA

RE: Support Beam - Residential

Since you are supporting a floor, I would only consider replacing steel with steel.  That's a long span for a wood floor beam, and creep deflection does affect floor serviceability.  You should investigate the CMU walls at the bearings.  I would want them to be grouted solid in the vicinity of the beam bearings.

RE: Support Beam - Residential

(OP)
Thanks.  I agree that the existing masonry walls and their footings need to be checked. And I should recommend fully grouting walls under new beam if it is not already done (home was originally built in the 1930's, not sure if it was common practice back then).

But whether the beam winds up being steel or engineered wood, I think it should be designed with support only at each end.  I have a hard time convincing myself that the 2x10s bearing on the beam will provide lateral bracing.  Agree?

RE: Support Beam - Residential

if the beam is supported on a pilaster on the inside of the structure, the moisture will likely not be a huge problem, but waterproofing will probably make all involved feel a little better.
There are wood beams resting on interior pilasters or pocketed into
CMU's all oer' the land. If the beam is not exposed to weather, moisture will not likely be a problem.  

If the increased reaction on the wall is problem, you may consider constructing a new pilaster or post inside he existing wall ...this will also make erecting the new beam much easier.
This will require a footing check or pouring a new small footing.  

RE: Support Beam - Residential

if there is a head room problem, you could temporarily support the 2x10 joists on either side of the main beam and cut them short, slide your new beam up in such that top-of-beam = top-of-joists, then hang the 2x10's from the new beam.
This can be achieved with a wideflange by bolting ledgers to the web of the wideflange

RE: Support Beam - Residential

....this will save you 9.25" of head room and provide better lateral stability to the beam.

Resting the 2x10s on the new beam should laterally brace the compression flange of the new beam.....doubt it will ever see uplift ...Unless the homeowner has a Blown Hemi and revs it up in the garage big smile  

RE: Support Beam - Residential

Good idea Toad, and I have done that too.  Depends on ducting and electrical too often though.  

I agree with Hokie here to replace the steel with steel.  If it was designed by an engineer (I realize that I am being idealistic here) the steel was used for a purpose initially, probably high loads, and deflections.  Stay with it.

Could have also been that the framing contractor had a couple of old steel beams laying around and wanted to save some money.  Seen that happen too.

As for the top flange lateral support issue, that has been discussed here in the forum many times.  Personally, if the joists rest on and are are nailed to a wood sill plate that is bolted to the steel beam, considering the stiffness of the diaphragm, I believe that the required lateral support to the top flange can be provided at every joist.  

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Support Beam - Residential

dcsrtuceng,

You have learnt the important lesson about domestic building, it definately can be more complex than most commercial buildings as the structural systems are not as defined and they involve all the major materials.

Personally I would agree with the comment above that the steel would be a better job due to:

shallower depth therefore more headroom
Lower long term deflection
Less end bearing issues

Sometimes the up front costs are only part of the issue and I would expect that the cost differential would not be much.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources