Is SA-479 316 Compliant with NACE MR0175 "as is"?
Is SA-479 316 Compliant with NACE MR0175 "as is"?
(OP)
Is SA-479 316 Compliant with NACE MR0175 "as is"?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
Is SA-479 316 Compliant with NACE MR0175 "as is"?
|
RE: Is SA-479 316 Compliant with NACE MR0175 "as is"?
Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04
RE: Is SA-479 316 Compliant with NACE MR0175 "as is"?
I am not familiar with NACE MR0175 requirements, but I recall hardness as a requirement for material. A second look at the SA-479 specification shows no hardness requirements are set.
Therefore, it seems at least without an extra requirement for hardness being specified, the material could not be guaranteed to meet NACE without a hardness inspection. However, I thought perhaps this type of material generally meets the imposed hardness requirements without having to do anything extra to it.
Is there a short list of other requirements to determine if a material meets NACE MR0175?
RE: Is SA-479 316 Compliant with NACE MR0175 "as is"?
Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/8/83b/b04