×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Lateral movement at the top of a wall

Lateral movement at the top of a wall

Lateral movement at the top of a wall

(OP)
We have a project on site and have noticed and issue with the design. Its a new house and we have a steel roof frame supported on external masonry cavity walls - the horizontal span is  approximately 6metres. The 1st floor extends vertically into the roof to form a cathedral ceiling so horizontal ties were not possible as they cros at approx. head level. There are 3 steel roof frames and each takes support from a 1st floor steel beam via a steel column. The floor beams span between the external walls. The roof frames are simply upside down V's with columns approximately centered.

The feet of the frame are modelled as having a release horizontally on one support so that the V frame is designed to minimise spread. This is required for 2 frames where the columns are off centre. The lifting up of one end of the steel roof frame is dealt with by a vertical steel tie. The design allowed for the about 6mm of horizontal movement at the the external walls which we were advised would be acceptable.

The roof frame was modelled independently of the floor beams. In other words although the beam was designed to take the column load the effect of deflection of the beam had not been considered in the roof deflections! Big Problem! The lateral deflection has now jumped to about 40mm.

We have no option but to strengthen the floor beams to deal with this but with what we can do we're still getting 15-20mm lateral deflection. I've checked all the steel members which still work for strength but my conern is all the timber rafters supported by the frame will try and push the walls out.

I'd be grateful for any thoughts or advice?

Also has anybody used slip bearings in a building structure situation. The roof frames sit on concrete padstones on the masonry walls which will not allow much slippage I presume. Again I'd be interested in peoples views on this as I've seen engineers detail steelwork sitting on masonry like this lots of times before and presumably not had a problem. Even the stiffest steel member will still deflect laterally so at what point is it considered not an issue or should slip bearings be used?

I'd be grateful for comments as I have a site meeting tomorrow to discuss the options!

Thanks

ps I'm not able to send a sketch at the moment but can do tomorrow if it helps.

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

Is it possible to jack up the roof frames and provide inplane bracing between the steel frames to minimise the horizontal deflection. Or perhaps plywood sheeting glued and screwed to the rafters.  

Kieran
 

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

(OP)
Kieran,

Thanks for the quick response.

Might work but I think it maybe a variable of what I'd thought of which was to form a steel ring beam at eaves level to prevent spread. The problem with this is that the 1st floor is then hung from the roof rather than it working the other way around.

 

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

A sketch would really help, even if it's freehand.

BA

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

Would the steel ring beam not need to span between the ends of the building? It could end up a very large size. Is it feasible to stiffen up the roof beams and add in some small diameter diagonal ties from eaves to the mid point of the opposite steel beam to form a scissor truss?

Kieran
 

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

I'm having trouble understanding how the beam deflection can result in 40mm of lateral deflection of the frame or how strengthening the floor beam can reduce the 40mm to 15 to 20mm.  What am I missing?

BA

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

BA:

I agree that a sketch would help immensely here.

As I visualize this, the inverted "V"'s are supported by the masonry wall at the ends, and a column that supports the top of the inverted "V".  The lower end of the column rests on a floor beam that is deflecting, allowing the top of the Vee to drop and the walls to spread.  If that is so, then strengthening the floor beam would reduce the spread.

Is this correct?

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

Mike,

You're probably correct.  I thought the inverted V frame spanned 6m with not central support.  I don't suppose it would be acceptable to add a column and footing under the beam.

Could add a collar tie above the headroom requirement, but that may not be acceptable either.

BA

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

Another possibility is to raise the column and provide steel shims between column and beam.  Snow load on the roof will still cause the beam to deflect, however.  

BA

RE: Lateral movement at the top of a wall

BAretired beat me to it.

Is the 40mm deflection a theoretical deflection or one measured on site? If it is theoretical then under what loads does it occur?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources