torque to tension
torque to tension
(OP)
i need to develop a certain tension in a steel rod with a turnbuckle. has is the correlation between a torque wrench and the rod tension made?
sure appreciate your help.
sure appreciate your help.






RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
Follow the advice of frv and dhengr
RE: torque to tension
If I recall correctly, there is something in RCSC about verifying nut turn on any fastener whose length is more than 10 or 12 times the diameter. I'll have to break out RCSC tomorrow...if I chose to go to work.
RE: torque to tension
"...you could bind up you nuts on the"...., "your nuts are bound up." What's that all about anyway? I kinda thought you took care of that problem about an hour ago on another thread. But, you are still the guilty party, as you put it. Please report your findings from RCSC for our edification. I think that's a slightly different problem than we have here, tell us how and why. I don't have my FEM turned on at the moment, so I'll have to await your findings to comment further. Nor do I have a current copy of the RCSC publications so it'll be interesting to hear what you find.
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
I am not quite sure how that would be done.
Download RCSC and see the comments of table 8.2, which may not even apply since RCSC is for ASTM A325 and A490 Bolts. My reference, in this case, would be in error. See also the commentary of 8.2 with regard to research on bolts longer than 12 db and using the turn-of-nut. This is what I was thinking of when I read the OP.
My apologies directly to dhengr.
RE: torque to tension
His comment reminds me of guys cranking life lines extremely tight and taking out the catenary....which is dangerous.
RE: torque to tension
Regarding turn-of-the-nut (the turnbuckle), put a tick mark on each end of the turnbuckle and on each rod at the same locations. One revolution of the turnbuckle w.r.t. the rods (average the two tick marks) means a certain amount of total rod extension as a function of the screw thread geometry involved. Clean the threads well, lub them lightly, try to hold the rods from turning without nicking them up. You will likely be working your threads well below yield, which is not the case for the slip critical joints and high strength bolts covered in Toad's ref., the RCSC. But, that's a good ref. for understanding this kind of problem. Those bolts and joints have been tested extensively, and their discussion about tightening up the plys or faying surfaces, prior to applying the turn-of-the-nut, is akin to my comment about supporting (straightening the rod out) the rod to get any sag out of it, and pre-tightening the turnbuckle in this condition. The structural high strength bolts are working at .7 or .8Fult. so there is some thread and bolt stretching and yielding going on with them. And, on larger and longer bolts the thread to body stretch changes, from what's been tested, so they want you to test against a calibrated tensioning device to set the turn-of-the-nut value for a given tension. Kickflip's comment deserves some thought too, as it takes almost an infinite force to remove the sag from a spanning rod by tension alone, so again, my reason for saying support it straight, then snug up the turnbuckle.
Otherwise, delta = PL/AE still holds true; and at f = P/A = 24ksi, you should get about .1" extension in the rods on a 10' gauge length. The class and geometry specifics of the screw thread involved will indicate how many turns produce .1" rod extension, i.e. a 3/4" - 10 UNC thread has 10 threads/inch, or one turn/.1" rod extension. You might clamp a 5' long metal bar at one end, atop your rod, so it is supported by your rod, and at the other end use a machinist's dial indicator to measure .05" bar movement, then compare the two results for you rod tension estimate.
RE: torque to tension
does "rods" imply rebar ? 'cause certainly you can pretension a free standing turnbuckle (like a tension wire brace)
and IMHO, PL/EA doesn't give you the relationship between torque and preload, 'cause you need to account for friction; no?
RE: torque to tension
This is what I was getting at with the super-tight life line installations I have seen in the field.
If you crank a life line tight and it approaches being horizontal, the geometry doesn't lend it self well to additional loading from a lanyard. Pre-loading only compounds matters further.
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
Why must you develop a certain tension in the steel rod? What is your application?
BA
RE: torque to tension
yes PL/EA defines the extension of the rod, but how do you connect P to T, the torque applied, ? wasn't that the original question ??
RE: torque to tension
The application is the post tensioning of the bottom chord of an existing damaged bowstring truss. In addition to the various other repairs, I am intending to utilize a steel round rod each side attached to the heel each end. I can determine the tension force i want developed in the rod but am uncertain how to verify that the contractor has attained it during the installation. I am thinking a calibrated torque wrench and turnbuckle system is the way to go but i am not sure. Thus my original question.
Thanks to all for valuable insight.
RE: torque to tension
It would be better to snug everything up, place lock nuts at the dead ends, then apply torque to a single nut, first marking where the starting position is, then measuring the elongation. Continue tightening until the desired elongation has been reached.
BA
RE: torque to tension
thank you. If i am understanding you correctly, the idea is apply a little tension to the rod to pull the truss heels towards each other to snug everything up, to allow all the connections to slip as much as they might, letting all the bolts move to the sides of their holes etcetera. The point reached after this initial 'snugging' movement i would call effectively the point of zero tension in the rod. then lock everything in place at this point except for a single turnbuckle. from this point i would require the number of turns of the turnbuckle to introduce the elongation necessary to achieve my design tension.
am i warm?
RE: torque to tension
Finally, put a lock nut on each live end.
BA
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
i think i have been disenchanted with the use of a torque wrench. The direct measurement of rod elongation as discussed in the 2nd 3rd and 4th posts directly above i think will form a part of the final plan.
Regarding the use of a strain gage, i think this sounds excellent, although, honestly, i do not know how to specify one, how to use one, nor how to direct a contractor to obtain and utilize it. the last one i remember was in college some years ago. if you would provide me some direction on this i would be most grateful.
RE: torque to tension
Read my two posts from 28FEB, for that matter make of hard copy of both of your threads and really study them. You must read btwn. the lines a little bit to see what applies to your specific problem, because until your last couple posts we were guessing at what you were trying to do. But, there are good bits of advice and applicable ideas in a number of the posts in the two threads.
Your local testing lab will do the strain gaging for you, the same people who test your soil, conc., steel and welds, etc. Or, talk to your local Uni. Prof. and get one of his/her Grad. students to do it as a class project. They have the equip. to do this and are experienced at it. It's not hard to do, we just aren't proficient at it. Look at my 28FEB11, 14:17 post for answers to several of your questions, and the last para. offers another fairly simple means of measuring rod extension. I don't know that I would strain gage on every truss, you are just trying to prove your simpler methods for reliability, if there are many trusses involved. This is certainly not an exact process, we are talking +/-kips, not 100's of pounds, and further truss relaxation will change things in fairly short order.
As other's have said, you will not pull the trusses back together with these rods, you must jack the trusses up and shore them to do most of that, and bring the bot. chords back above a straight line. Then, your thought that you start snugging everything up with these rods is a sound idea, but this is also a judgement call, not an exact number. You have already studied the condition of all the truss joints and you watch them settle back into position; you watch the truss length, movement at bearings, etc. And, you called it 'zero tension in the rod' at this point, but that's no longer really true, I'd call it your started point for the final prestressing, the starting point for your elongation measurement. BA's comments on nuts and locknuts at the ends is good because that gives you three points at which to do the tensioning, and this will be helpful particularly if you harp the rods. Of course, this assumes you have some working access at the ends of the trusses.
RE: torque to tension
thinking about it, you probably can't use these ... you're tensioning up the rod, to snug up everything, and want to understand how much load you've up into the rod. P = 5T/d is a rough estimate. You could dble check this with witness marks on the rod, to measure the extension (but i expect this'll be so small that the error in measuring would be like the scatter in the torque wrench).
RE: torque to tension
I'm not so sure harping the rods is a good idea. We are talking about a bowstring truss. Under uniform snow load, the top chord is in almost pure compression, the bottom chord in almost pure tension and the web members are almost unstressed. Do you think it is wise to introduce upward reactions at the third points?
If the rods are straight along the bottom chord, there is a danger in introducing too much tension in them. We know that the bottom chord has been damaged, but we don't know where and how badly damaged it is. Is the bottom chord capable of taking the compression which the rods are adding? If the bottom chord buckles, nothing useful has been accomplished.
Perhaps a better plan is to stress the rods until the bottom chord is raised to the same level as the undamaged trusses. Then, when the snow arrives, all trusses will sag more or less uniformaly. Does it snow in California?
The rods should be periodically supported from the truss to prevent sag under self weight.
BA
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension
There is another issue which has not been discussed. If the existing bottom chord is totally disregarded, the addition of the two rods results in a tied arch, not a truss. That means that unsymmetrical snow load will cause bending in the top chord which was not present with the truss.
BA
RE: torque to tension
BA.... All good points, and you may well be right. But as is usual, we were asked a fairly complex design question and have been given a dearth of meaningful and important info. At least we have peaked Efsinc's interest now, and he's back in the bldg. I've been working on the assumption that the trusses were overloaded, the bot. chords over stressed and some small uplift might be helpful, but we can't really answer that right now, in either need, eccentricity or in magnitude. For all the trouble I seem to get into when I talk about computers and computer programs, I would like to see a couple simple computer runs on this truss, under the different loading conditions, along with its construction details, member sizes and dimensions. I don't know where the structure is or what the load conditions are. In the U.S, that will be another 30 or 40 pages of ASCE 7, Min. Loads reading and calcs.
RE: torque to tension
RE: torque to tension