Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
(OP)
Heres my problem.
I need to design a small spring type device that has minimal moving parts for a cleanroom environment.
____________________________
A sketch of the spring lever mechanism
http:// files.engi neering.co m/getfile. aspx?folde r=e64f6b92 -a6ed-46c1 -b2fa-0a7d c9ffa946&a mp;file=un titled.bmp
Part one is the lever arm
Part two is the spring material that is fixed to the lever arm
-The general shape of the stainless steel spring
ht tp://files .engineeri ng.com/get file.aspx? folder=a32 51a41-b37b -4c5e-9c30 -2f7a5f4ec 572&fi le=B_1.jpg
parts three is a cover piece
part four is a main body that the latch will contact with
______________________________________
The latch releases when a small downward force is applied to the top of the lever (part 1) as shown in my fairly rough sketch.
A force of 15 - 50 grams would suffice. I dont need a lot of force in the spring to keep the clip in the closed position
I would like to use a spring material (part 2) that will transfer this downward force and release the latch, part one will be of a ridgid shape and would ideally not flex when the downward force is applied.
The spring material (part two) would do all the flexing.
I was looking at a stainless spring steel something like, Stainless Type 302, ASTM A313.
Im not getting great results with the force to deflection of the spring (part 2).
If I use a small sized spring part it fails long before i am getting my desired results.
So my two questions are..
Is there a more suitable spring material that would deflect under small loads and not fail like the spring steel.
or maybe the shape of the mechanism i am trying to design is totally wrong.
__________________
note: this mechanism must be made from metal and kept as simple as possible. I have ruled out hinges and small individual springs as they are not ideal for the clean environment that this mechanism will be required to operate in.
Any input is greatly appreciated
I need to design a small spring type device that has minimal moving parts for a cleanroom environment.
____________________________
A sketch of the spring lever mechanism
http://
Part one is the lever arm
Part two is the spring material that is fixed to the lever arm
-The general shape of the stainless steel spring
ht
parts three is a cover piece
part four is a main body that the latch will contact with
______________________________________
The latch releases when a small downward force is applied to the top of the lever (part 1) as shown in my fairly rough sketch.
A force of 15 - 50 grams would suffice. I dont need a lot of force in the spring to keep the clip in the closed position
I would like to use a spring material (part 2) that will transfer this downward force and release the latch, part one will be of a ridgid shape and would ideally not flex when the downward force is applied.
The spring material (part two) would do all the flexing.
I was looking at a stainless spring steel something like, Stainless Type 302, ASTM A313.
Im not getting great results with the force to deflection of the spring (part 2).
If I use a small sized spring part it fails long before i am getting my desired results.
So my two questions are..
Is there a more suitable spring material that would deflect under small loads and not fail like the spring steel.
or maybe the shape of the mechanism i am trying to design is totally wrong.
__________________
note: this mechanism must be made from metal and kept as simple as possible. I have ruled out hinges and small individual springs as they are not ideal for the clean environment that this mechanism will be required to operate in.
Any input is greatly appreciated





RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
If the stainless doesn't work for you, perhaps something else? If yoou need antimicrobial properties, you can plate with silver.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
htt
How and where is spring failing?
Getting flat springs to work is difficult. Flexing can be concentrated in one area which takes all the punishment and fails. The trick is to distribute the flexing over as much of the spring as possible. Can you get spring to roll over radius.
Take a look at these for ideas;
h
htt
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Dan
www.eltronresearch.com
Dan's Blog
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
If for some reason a stock latch won't fit your configuration, one piece plastic latch with a strike plate of stainless or plastic should do the trick.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
If yes, why bother with a spring at all? Just rearrange the geometry a bit and let gravity do its thing.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
If you have to go with a flat spring and as stated above it is
tricky to do. I would look at 17/7 PH SS in the annealed
condition and heat treat after forming. Again as posted above
use as large a radius as possible.
You don't have to make spring to your exact configuration as
you can clamp a candidate material in vise and see the force
required to bend. The exposed length should be as long as the
distance from the center of the bend to the end. Not absolute
but in the ballpark.
http://www.brownmetals.com/home.asp#
If you have any quantity you might want to look at someone like Four Slide.
http://www.fourslide.com/flat-springs.htm
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Regarding your mechanism, I've got a memory rattling around about a flat spring mechanism I've seen in everyday use. I think it might have been on luggage or an attache case or something similar, back before plastics took over and metal was still used. Raincoats maybe . . . you had a flap that folded over and it had a spring action tab on it. You slid that tab under a "loop" (it was flattened, a rectangular profile) and the tab sprung up and its back shoulder held against the loop. To release, you pressed down on the tab and pushed it back under the loop. I remember these on something (or things) from when I was a kid.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Based on your sketch,I roughed out the stresses using a force of 50 grams I got a bending stress of only about 33,000 psi for a .005 inch thickness times .57" wide spring strip. But .005 is probably impractical and making it thicker will increase the stress proportional, but may give to small a width for your purpose. For example doubling the thickness to .010: will result in a width of .05"( varies inversely as the thickness cubed)
Analysis:
I estimate that the moment is almost constant over the spring.
F= 50gms=0.1 lb
L=0.8 inches
M=0.08 lb in
From sketch the deflection angle looks like
20 degrees=Pi/9
the deflection formula for constant M
deflection angle=M*r*@/EI
r= radius of spring estimate(0.5")
@=Pi/2 this is the spring working length angle (this estimate may be slightly high)
So, evaluating
Pi/9=.1*.8*.5*Pi/2/EI
Solving for EI
EI=.1*.8*.5*9/2=0.18
I=0.18/E
For a 0.005 thick strip, the strip width is
w=12I/t^3=0.57"
c=t/2=.0025
the stress is
Mc/I=.08*.0025/I=.08*.01*E/.18=33,000 psi
Now, the .005" thickness may be too thin for structural reasons; if so, you could increase the active length of spring by using 3/4 of a clock spring and improve the rigidity.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
I have uploaded a file detailing how to calculate the deflection of bent or shaped springs using a Strain Energy method.
If your going down the road of doing your own design then I would determine the deflection needed for the spring first and then worry about force and spring stress.
There are other methods to calculate deflection of bent or shaped springs that you can use, my only advice here is not to approximate it from linear beam theory deflection as it will lead to errors.
I have based my calculation on your sketch ie a straight beam with a quadrant at one end and used the section that zekeman used for the "I" value, you will see that for a 50gram load it will deflect about 5mm but the section as just yielded reaching a value of 251N/mm^2.
If you need a large deflection you need a very low stiffness spring, ie a lot lower than the one I have calculated, one way to do this is increase the spring working length so that more material is available to absorb the energy.
If you provide further details of your spring we might be able to help further.
desertfox
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Good analysis, but if you look at the OP sketch the moment "arm" is closer to 20mm vs your 7mm. This could explain that I get 10 times the flexibility and the 20 degrees of motion that I estimated from the sketch.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Yes the straight portion is 7.3mm but I add the radius of 12.7mm
to make up the 20mm overall length, thanks for the compliment.
desertfox
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
I have some 3/", 1/2", %/8" wide steel (Bainitic and some hardened) strapping that I've used for springs to hold detent balls and if I get time I will try to bend one to the configuration in the OP's sketch.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you
@TheTick (Mechanical);
Multiple leaves is a good idea but unfortunately wouldn't be ideal in this cleanroom environment.
@asimpson (Mechanical);
No Clean room latches wouldn't suffice but thank you for the suggestion.
The c-flex bearings are an interesting concept, hadn't heard of them before.
"where was the spring failing" –
The spring is failing at the curved part. I am using a simplified FEA analysis, 0.25mm thick stainless steel and presuming that the force from above will approximate to a identical force at right angles to the bottom of the face that will make contact and move. The spring is 5mm thick and I have tried a few different thicknesses.
@Eltron (Mechanical) & @ornerynorsk (Industrial) & @plasgears (Mechanical)
I cannot use plastics due to the environment that they will operate in unfortunately
@MintJulep (Mechanical),
I have to hold the cover piece onto the main body, unfortunately gravity alone wont suffice, It would make everything a whole lot easier though!
@unclesyd (Materials)
Thank you for the design suggestions, material suggestions and links
@tr1ntx (Mechanical) & TVP (Materials) thank you
@zekeman (Mechanical) Thank you so much for the calculations and clock spring type idea to increase the flexibility. I wasn't expecting anyone to do calculations, much appreciated.
I will look into this if I cannot get a simple bent leaf spring to work sufficiently.
@desertfox (Mechanical)
Thank you too for taking the time and effort to do those calculations and scan and upload them. Did you use an online reference for the formulae or a what literature would you mind me asking.
It would be ideal to have some hand calculations to check if that the FEA is giving good results.
I would ideally like the spring to have 16 degrees of movement which is approximately 6mm's in the horizontal. This could approximate to a 20mm length and 5mm radius of the vertical part of the spring.
I will definitely need to increase the length for the part that flexes. Giving it a longer lever to flex over. And yes should increase the radius of the spring too. Great suggestions, much appreciated.
@ unclesyd (Materials) Thank you too.
I was also considering that the spring may have a greater freedom to flex If I do not fix the whole length of the horixontal face but give it maybe 15mms of contact and fix it behind this.
Looking at the few and the calculations that have been completed here, Im not so confident I will get a 6mm horizontal movement with my current design..
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
When you get the problem it resolved if possible please let the Forum know the results.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Any decent Strength of Materials text book should have a chapter which covers curved or shaped beams. The method I used is known as the strain energy method. Another theory would be Castigliano's, again this can be found in any decent text book. However, if you post dimensions of your spring and where it is restrained we can perhaps run a hand calc to assist you.
Desertfox
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
see3p0,
I'm a bit confused.
Do you mean the spring is .25mm times 5mm wide? And when you say you have tried other thicknesses, do you mean widths?
If you say the .25mm x 5mm spring is failing, I would look for a metallurgy issue, since by my calculations the stress for 20 degrees of rotation is well under the infinite life cycle values.
(1) Pi/9/(.5*pi*r=0.44=M/EI
basically,from my earlier post
And the stress is
(2) sigma=Mc/I
c=.5mm/2=.125mm=.005"
Dividing both equations
sigma=E*.44*c=66,000 psi
which is a very good working stress for stainless.
I got 33,000 psi for the .005"thickness I used in my earlier post.
Stainless 302 data I have is 130,000 psi working stress for flat spring material. So your failures may be due to manufacturing technique.
From sheet data on stainless 302 I found the allowed tensile stress is 130,000 psi
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
I am weak at mechanical calculations, but I have got the feeling that if you could alter and increase the shape of the spring form and radius in such a way that the spring in stead of a 'rounded approximate 90 deg angle' have a form that includes the first (rounded)third of an S-curve, a large radius swinging a bit up, before turning a large (but somewhat smaller, but fairly larger than original) circle radius down to reqired straight strech, this could perhaps alter your parameters and avoid the stresses at sharper angeled curves?
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Thanks again for the input.
I am using the FEA program in Unigraphics to run an analysis of the spring. I hadnt set it up correctly in my previous post. I seem to be getting ok results now (but I would really rather use hand calculations). The analysis setup allows one to choose from a list of materials and does not allow the input of specific material properties.
I chose AISI 303 - cold drawn Stainless Steel.
I essentially need a piece of spring steel as shown in my initial post,
ht
I ideally require a radius between 5 and 6 mms, with overall dimensions as shown previously. A thickness and width that will suit the deflection of 5mm's (horizontal) or approximately 20 degrees as Zekeman worked out earlier.
I ran a simple analysis with 50 grams force
I used a 6mm radius, 14mm horizontal beam and 14mm in the vertical. I used a thickness of 1.25mm's and width of 6mm.
The model was set up as Desertfoxes sketch (PDF)
I got a displacement of 4.82mm and a stress of 434 Mpa. The only info this simple fea gives is that it wont fail (safety factor 1.7)
I just dont know how good these results are and would prefet the hand calcs to compare to, and obviously some advice of fatigue and safe stress levels.
Hi Desertfox,
Thank you again for the valuable advice and input. Regarding Materials books, I have 'Mechanics of Materials -Beer Johnson, De-Wolfe. It discusses deflection of a beam using strain energy. But does not mention a circular/ or quarter section unfortunately. What book did you reference to get the formulae would you mind me asking?
I got results that matched yours from you uploaded PDF, when I set a simple analysis up as illustrated in your sketch.
stress was 251.7 Mpa and deflection was 4.42mm.
Your results were also 251 and about 5mm deflection.
Hi Zekeman,
Once again thank you too for your great input. Yes I meant 5mm width previously, apologies.
So the spring was failing because of my flawed FEA setup and I dont think its the best program to complete these calculations.
I was running through your calculation method, could you direct me to anywhere I could find the formulae online or method. I was having a bit of trouble following it, my apologies.
What did you mean by
'@=Pi/2 this is the spring working length angle' ??
in your first post.
'Stainless 302 data I have is 130,000 psi working stress for flat spring material'
130,000 psi = 896.3 N/mm^2
Would this mean that If I am calculating a working stress of around 66,000 or 450 N/mm^2 then the design should be within safe limits and will not fail. Presuming I am using a 302 spring steel?
I am getting values
0.2% Offset Yield Strength, of 30,000 PSI
http://www.upmet.com/302-mechanical.shtml
and 40,000 PSI Yield Strength
http://www.espimetals.com/tech/stainlesssteel.pdf
But I presume the difference is because they are not Stainless Spring Steel, or just bad numbers?
Thank you for the input Unclesyd and GerhardL, I will definitely try alter the shape if i cant get good results from this 1/4 round shape.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Try O'Roarks formula's for stress and strain it might have curved beams in there.
I am slightly confused why your saying 130000psi for a working stress when the steel as a yield stress of 30000psi, to me you should be below 30000 if you don't want your spring to yield.
I'll be home tomorrow so I'll try to find some other references for you.
desertfox
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
In my last post I was quoting what Zekeman said about the working stress of stainless steel 302.
''Stainless 302 data I have is 130,000 psi working stress for flat spring material''
Maybe It was a typo, the statement just confused me.
I have Roarks so will give that a look.
Thank you,
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
It comes in sheets work hardened to those and higher values, typically for spring applications.
By googling I found this link.
htt
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Your are wealth of Knowledge.
So a steel is hardened to have a 130,000 psi working stress, would I be correct in presuming this steel would therefore have a greater resistance to an applied bending force?
For example the L shaped spring we discussed earlier, Its shaped, and once hardened It will no longer deflect the 20 degrees with the same 0.1 lb force?
And Zekeman would you possibly have a reference to where you completed your calculations from, some online source or in a book?
Your assistance is greatly appreciated
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
No, the elasticity is essentially constant and unaffected by the hardness.I,E. the modulus of elasticity remains
E=30,000,000 psi.
Also
"And Zekeman would you possibly have a reference to where you completed your calculations from, some online source or in a book?"
I am trying to upload the analysis I did in more detail. The fundamental equation from beam theory is used and is available in any strength of materials book. The solution is classical. I didn't use the energy approach which is genrally more powerful but not necessary here.
So here goes
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Well I had a look round the site you posted and found the hardened stock suitable with a suitable stress level for your spring however I couldn't find any section below 0.009" thickness.
Here is a link to the Strain energy methods for deflection of curved or shaped beams, start at page 8.
h
desertfox
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
Once again thank you for the info and that nice link. You have been a great help in assisting with this design.
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism
What keeps it from going sideways when pressed?
Regards,
Mike
RE: Material & Concept thoughts on this simple spring Mechanism