×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Live load on chain link fence

Live load on chain link fence

Live load on chain link fence

(OP)
In AASHTO LRFD Section 13.8.2:

"The design load for the chain link or metal fabric fence shall be 0.015 ksf acting normal to the entire surface"

How was this load derived? It doesn't make sense to apply it to the entire surface no matter what height of the fence is. (For example, 10 ft high chain link fence over the bridge). Live load is live load. No matter what type of the fence is, the total applied live load should be simillar, correct? Should 0.2+0.05L be the maxium live load for the chain link fence post design?

 

RE: Live load on chain link fence

I don't think so. Railing is intended to be more robust than a fencing. A person or persons could walk or sit on the railing, which would necessitate a higher design load.  

I've never heard of anyone designing a fence on a bridge, except on occasion the anchorage.

0.015 ksf? Who knows where it came from, but it seems reasonable. For example, elevator capacity assumes (at least it used to) an average weight per person of 150#. Roughly, there's the 15 psf (body surface area).

RE: Live load on chain link fence

(OP)
if 15 psf is the body surface, it will make more sence to apply it on the average people height not the total surface of the fence. when the fence gets higher, 0.015 ksf could create higher load than 0.2+0.05L to its post and anchorage, which doesn't make sence to me.

RE: Live load on chain link fence

Are you actually designing a chain link fence? If you don't like 15 psf, there's no law saying you can't use a higher number.

RE: Live load on chain link fence

Probably based on wind and maybe some seismic.  Probably conservative as chain link lets a lot of air blow thru - but they picked a number to make it easy for everyone??

I've seen plenty of fences on bridges - tends to cut down on suicides and rock throwing..

RE: Live load on chain link fence

(OP)
it will make more sense to me if it is wind load. But it is so confusing to put it under the live load section in AASHTO.  

RE: Live load on chain link fence

Generally, wind on a fence is neglected for loads to the substrucutre, unless it's a very dense mesh. Standard chainlink fence - 1" openings - just forget it.

Why does AASHTO do things a certain way? Because they've always done it that way.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources