×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

UHX-13.2 - Definition of Edge Conditions

UHX-13.2 - Definition of Edge Conditions

UHX-13.2 - Definition of Edge Conditions

(OP)
All:

For over 20 years, and as recently as several months ago, we have been getting large (16,000-27,000 ft^2) code stamped process heat exchangers for PET plants with one tubeheet integral to shell and channel, and the other tube sheet integral to shell and extended as flange.  

So far, no issues have been raised as per UHX-13.2:  "The two tubesheets shall have the same thickness, material, and edge conditions".

My interpretation, as well as PVElite, is that this is being violated.

Comments please!

RE: UHX-13.2 - Definition of Edge Conditions

So by that interpretation, a TEMA type AEN, or TEMA type NEM shell & tube heat exchanger is not a permissible design?

My interpretation here is that when both tubesheets have the same configuration as per fig UHX-13.1, then they must have same geometry.

The general conditions of applicability in UHX-10 refer the designer to U-2(g) when the conditions are UHX-10 are not satisfied.  If all else fails, that's the answer.

-TJ Orlowski

RE: UHX-13.2 - Definition of Edge Conditions

condesinc, TJOrlowski I agree such designs are not within the scope of Part UHX, strictly speaking.

So what meets U-2(g) aside from FEA? Maybe the older TEMA calculations, but that depends upon acceptibility to the parties involved. Same goes for FEA.

I say again, regular readers will know I am not a big fan of Part UHX tubsheet calculations. There are far more ordinary designs excluded than included.

Regards,

Mike

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources