×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

FE Analysis Software (Concrete)

FE Analysis Software (Concrete)

FE Analysis Software (Concrete)

(OP)
From the numerous finite element concrete design packages available, do you have a preference for one or the other? Can we make a sort of poll to determine what is most widely used and why?
    I, for instance, use Frame from The Prokon Structural Analysis and Design package.
    A number of reasons support my choice, of course: ease of modeling, no hourglassing effect for elements, choice of support definitions (rigid, pinned, spring), etc.

RE: FE Analysis Software (Concrete)

Lutchmanen -

My guess is that it will depend on your type of application.
1) Concrete frame analysis and design.
2) Concrete shear wall buildings.
3) Advanced concrete frame analyis (i.e. non-linear backbone curves for moment connections and push-over analysis)
4) Concret detailing (rather than pure analysis).
5) Elevated slab buildings (with or without post-tensioning)

Those are all pretty much related to commercial building structures.  I'd wager that program folks use for frame analysis would be differnt than the one they use for push-over or elevated slabs. Also, I'm sure there are another set of structures (Water retaining structures, dams, mass concrete, et cetera) that might go for another type of analysis package.  

Not sure that Prokon has any real penetration here in the North American market....   

RE: FE Analysis Software (Concrete)

(OP)
I have been thinking that Prokon might be only used in the African-Australasia regions only. I guess that is really the case then.
    You are right about the design-specific packages people would use.
    But lets take for example concrete frame analysis and shear wall designs, do you have any software that you use that would provide for both Plane Stress and Plane Strain analaysis?
    Another question that has been bothering me is the fact that some FE software, for example for plane stress analysis, define shells with four nodes while other define with eight nodes. I was wondering why the difference? I suppose that four nodes are more appropriate and do provide a better simulation of deformation, rather than eight nodes, which may show uplifting, right?
    This single difference between sofwares is quite significant, isnt it?

RE: FE Analysis Software (Concrete)

I don't think you'd be using a plain strain element for for either a shear wall or moment frame system at all.  You're usually only going to use those for mass concrete applications (like a dam).  

I cannot address the differences between 4 and 8 node plates very well.  They're just different element formulations. The structural FEM packages here in the US rely almost entirely on 4 node elements. Therefore, I suspect that you have to get into mechanical or aerospace applications before 8 node plates become desirable or practical.... though that is just an educated guess.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources