×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Actual orifice area vs effective area?

Actual orifice area vs effective area?

Actual orifice area vs effective area?

(OP)
Why is a valve's actual (certified) area less than the effective area, which is used in flow formulas to determine the capacity of a relief valve?

For example, for an API "L" orifice (effective area = 2.853 sq in) the certified orifice areas (ref National Board NB 18) for Crosby and Farris are:
Crosby: 2.025 sq in
Farris: 2.009 sq in

I would have thought that the "effective area" used for flow capacity calcs would have been less than the "actual" to provide a bit of unpublished flow capacity.

This came up as I was performing a Caesar relief valve dynamic analysis that required the "minimum diameter of the relief valve throat". At first I used the "API" orifice diameter and the calculated capacity was almost twice the published capacity for the valve. Once I used the "actual - certified" value for the particular valve, the calculated capacity was pretty close to the published value for an "L" orifice.

Anybody have any thoughts?

RE: Actual orifice area vs effective area?

Actual area is larger than the API effective area. This is due to the 0.9 ASME de-rating factor of the discharge coefficient. In order to use the API discharge coefficients and standard sizes manufacturers have chosen to increase the area. Calculating the certified capacity using the certified de-rated discharge coefficient and the actual area gives approximately the same capacity (or required area) as using the API discharge coefficients and the standard API effective areas. Check the Consolidated catalogue.

RE: Actual orifice area vs effective area?

(OP)
CMA010,
My mistake.

Thanks, you made me look closer at the two values.

I was comparing API effective area to actual Orifice Diameter. I hate it when that happens.

Regards
Bill

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources