×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Power engineering (pulse power) question
3

Power engineering (pulse power) question

Power engineering (pulse power) question

(OP)
I have a simple circuit designed to discharge a large capacitor in a short amount of time. The latch I use to discharge the energy stored in the capacitor is robust and can handle well above the amount of current and voltage I am discharging. My problem is, when I connect a short load to the output the switching device is destroyed. I think this is caused by flyback voltage (the only thing between the switch and the load is an inductor). My question is how do you protect against this without reducing the amount of energy discharged or increasing the duration of the discharge too much?  

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

What do you mean by "short load"?
Regards
Marmite

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

There's a duplicate thread over at thread248-292116: Power engineering (pulse power) question. Can we pick one thread or the other and answer there?

Alue - please don't start multiple threads on the same topic. It fragments discussion and irritates everybody.
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

If your switching device is destructed, I think it must be a semiconductor device of some sort. Mechanical switches usually aren't destroyed.

If you use a thyristor, there is an important parameter called current rate-of-rise. If your current rises faster than allowed, the conducting zone doesn't have time to spread over the whole semiconductor surface and the silicon will overheat and melt.

I do not think that you have a problem with inductive kick-back.

Scotty is right. It is a nuisance to have a discussion in more than one thread. Red-flag the other thread.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Post a circuit diagram with part numbers and/or ratings. Include resistance of the inductor.
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Gunnar,

no problem to find capacitor banks that will easily destroy every mechanical switch and also you can design semiconductor switches to withstand quite severe discharges:

http://www.hzdr.de/db/Cms?pOid=21864&pNid=473

 

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Right as usual, Uwe.

But if the guy thinks it is inductive kick-back, then I think he is using thyristors. And then, if he doesn't know about di/dt ratings, I thought it was a good idea to tell him.

Wanted to build up some interest first.
 

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

(OP)
I'm sorry about the double thread, my accident.
Skogsgurra you are correct the switch is a thyristor.  The peak di/dt of the switch is 30 kA/μSec.  The capacitor is 10μF charged to 3kV discharging into an inductance of 18mH.  I don't remember the resistance, it is relatively low, but I will have to double check that.  The inductor at the end is not imperative.   

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

If there is no resistance in the circuit where will the energy of the capacitor be dissipated except the switch? Of course each component will have some resistance but the switch is likely to be the largest part. So is the switch capable of absorbing this amount of energy in a small fraction of a second?

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Are you sure that the inductance is 18 mH? That's a very high L.

The maximum possible di/dt is no more than 17 kA/s, which is quite low. And very low compared to your spec (30 000 000 kA/s). The latter is, on the other hand, an extremely high value. Are you sure about the order of magnitude?

If the numbers are correct, then the current will probably continue through zero and you will have the reverse voltage that you mentioned in your first post.

A reverse diode parallel to the thyristor is what you need. With that high inductivity, I do not think that it needs to be very fast. If you see high reverse peak voltage also after adding the diode, a snubber can take care of that.

Yes, you need the resistor. If you leave that out, the thyristor will discharge the snubber capacitor and kill itself again.

 

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

(OP)
Skogsgurra
I am sure about the maximum di/dt it's a Heavy Duty thyristor.  The inductance I will have to double check on.  
Excuse my dumb question, but where are you getting the 17 kA/s maximum possible di/dt from?  
When I say 'the inductors at the end is not imperative', I mean that I can change the values or change it out as needed.  
Thanks a lot for your help!

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Alue,
  It sounds like (absent a schematic) what you've got once the thyristor fires, is an LC tank circuit. That's going to ring. Or at least it will want to until the thyristor turns off at the zero crossing. Then, several interesting failure modes could occur.

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

The maximum di/dt is the rate of rise when you connect 3000 V to an 18 mH inductor. Since E=-L*di/dt, you then have 3000=.018*di/dt, which makes initial di/dt equal to 3000/.018 and that is pretty close to 17 kA/s.

Re. the thyristor di/dt, I still wonder if your numbers are correct. This thyristor ( http://semtexinternational.com/SDiv/SPL/TST/HPSI/T36A7KV.pdf ) is a high power thyristor with a high di/dt rating. Still, it is limited to 300 000 kA/s. that is one thousandth of your rating. I think you need to have a closer look at your number of zeroes. Not that it is a problem - your 30 kA/us is more than you need. It is only a question of what is possible and what is not possible. The 30 kA/us is not possible.

 

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Thanks! I have to reconsider what is possible.

Thanks.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

You need to read what PHovnanian has posted again. You can't dissipate the energy stored in the cap by discharging it into an inductor.

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

I only can agree to the recommendation by Skogsgurra:

Add a diode to protect the thyristor when the voltage reverses

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

A diode doesn't allow the capacitor to stay discharged the first time. It would just allow the circuit to resonate and the cap would go through a few discharging and charging cycles before finally staying discharged. I believe you want to rid of most of the inductance in the circuit and use a suitable resistor.
 

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

That is not possible, Lionel.

A resistor does not limit du/dt. The inductor is probably the coil where the pulse is used to magnetize a workpiece. Or it may be the coil in an electric gun. Or some other use. Getting rid of the inductance is not a solution.

It is also not necessary to fully discharge the capacitor. The cycle is as follows: Charge capacitor (may take seconds), fire the thyristor (capacitor discharges in short time, 'millisecondish' or less), current in coil rises, falls and reverses and charges capacitor backwards 'somewhat'. The capacitor is then charged from the HV supply and the next cycle is ready to begin.

If the capacitor is polarized, it is an easy matter to add another diode so it will not charge in reverse.

Energy will be dissipated in resistance in thyristor, wires, coil, capacitor and diode.  

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

I can't read minds. The OP posted "a simple circuit designed to discharge a large capacitor in a short amount of time".

In a perfect L-C ciruit, the capacitor would be first discharged to zero voltage. At zero voltage, the current and the magnetic field in the inductor has both reached their peak levels. So, the magnetic field in the inductor will start to collapse which forces the current to continue to flow. This re-charged the capacitor to the same voltage level but opposite polarity. At this point, the magnetic field and current in the inductor are both zero and the thyristor will turn-off and not allow any reverse current to flow to discharge the capacitor. You have to remember, the thyristor will conduct until a current zero is reached, not until the voltage zero is reached. There can be a big difference between the two.

In reality, you have series resistances which creates a R-L-C circuit. Some energy is dissipated in the resistive element meaning the reverse voltage on the capacitor peaks at a lower level than the original starting voltage.

I don't see any "flyback" or "kick-back" issue requiring a diode here. There should be no energy left in the inductor to cause a destructive voltage surge. Still, the capacitor isn't left in a discharged state.

I have to question the gate signal the OP is using. He needs to hit the gate fairly hard to achieve those good di/dt capabilities. Try a gate circuit that is around 30V open circuit and will source 1A when shorted.

I also wonder if there is some stray capacitance in the circuit causing a higher frequency oscillation that rides on top of the discharge current. This could cause the thyristor to rapidly commutate on and off a number of times when it's first triggered and some thyristors don't take kindly to that kind of abuse.

 

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Thyristors are not as simple as you believe, LionelHutz.

The main disadvantage of the circuit you suggest, is that after the pulse the capacitor is charged in the wrong direction.

However, if you want to apply it regardless of this disadvantage, you should take care that there is a snubber provided for the turn-off of the tyristor.

After the current has crossed zero the thyristor will exhibit a reverse recovery peak. This reverse recovery peak current will stop after recovery and you need the snubber to allow further current flow without destruction.

A freewheeling diode, either antiparallel to the thyristor or antiparallel to the capacitor will relief the thyristor from the reverse recovery.

Two recommendations to Alue:
- You would have avoided lot of guesswork, if you had posted your circuit and the components datasheet in the initial post
- There is lot of literature available on using thyristors in pulse power circuits, from IEEE Xplore library as well as from suppliers like ABB or Infineon (the two biggest players in the thyristor business)

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

(OP)
I'm sorry for my late reply.  I was in error about some of my calculations, for one the inductance is MUCH lower, giving a much higher rise time, but not exceeding maximum di/dt.  For simplification, once the capacitor is allowed to discharge, it creates and arc from positive to ground. So once the arcing is complete, I guess it would become an open circuit again.  Would a large (and high wattage) output resistor in parallel with the output of the thyristor and ground help?
Thanks for the recommendations uwe.  I will look into them.  

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Thanks. I did ask you "Are you sure that the inductance is 18 mH? That's a very high L"

A diagram and an explanation of what you are doing would have taken a lot of blind guessing out of this thread.

Could you, please, provide details now?

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: Power engineering (pulse power) question

Now it's a circuit that disharges into an arc and posts to the SCR data sheet are disappearing? You really need to actually explain what you are doing and post a schematic...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources