×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling
2

Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

(OP)
We don't normally do aluminum, but we're trying to help out a client that is in a bind without sticking our neck out in the process.

My question is: does the ADM or AISC SCM specify the required depth of a stiffener at intermediate locations of an element (10" leg on a L-shape) with a free edge to prevent local buckling?  See ADM B.5 (custom extrusion, not welded)

I have found the required I (m.o. inertia) for a stiffener along a web supported at top and bottom at ADM B.5.5.3, Fig B.5.5, but this is not our case unfortunately.  I want to use ADM B.5.5.4 Alternate Method with stiffeners, but it doesn't specify minimum stiffener depth.

Background:
I have a 2" x 10" custom extruded 'L' shape aluminum facade vertically spanning 11'6" x 2 stories spaced 6" apart all around a parking garage (shiny!).  I'm taking the wind load partially in the weak axis worst case, and for a thickness of 3/16" it's failing in local buckling (using ADM F.5 procedure).  

Increasing the thickness to .26" solves the problem for us, but will cost the client $x0,000 above the budget.

I have found that ADM F.8 (pointing to B.5) will allow me to add stiffeners to the 10" leg along the length of the 'L' shape (but I can NOT add at the tip of the leg) and avoid the painful b/t ratio of the leg.  The problem now is that it doesn't tell me what the required depth of a stiffener on a leg with a free edge will be

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

I don't buy it...something doesn't seem right about your analysis.  An L10x2x3/16 should easily handle that span with the spacing you noted, assuming you are using a 6061-T6 or 6063-T6 alloy.

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

Your best strategy is to back off, i.e. don't commit yourself.

BA

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

How do you control which way the wind blows?  Your sketch shows it at an acute angle, but why couldn't it blow perpendicular to the 10" leg?

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

The welding will reduce the allowable stress on the aluminium, I would avoid mid span welds as much as possible.

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

if you can, change the L to a Z (add a lip on the end of the flange).

why are you using the weak axis ?  surely the critical load is the wind impacting dead onto the door ?  surely (despite your drwg note to minimise Ds) you've got the 10" flange normal to the door surface, so that the wind load is causing the stiffener to bend about it's strong axis, no?

increasing the thickness would be a problem (if you've made the extrusion already), what about reducing the pitch ??

 

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

I don't think your case is covered.  You have one supported edge and and intermediate stiffener.  I am not sure how effective they will be.  If you all ready have the angle did you plan on welding them to the leg? If you weld them you are going to have weld effected zones and a lower Fb because of it. Also, it is not even covered in Table B.5.1, so what would you use for lambda(eq).

I think that the best way is to add the lip at the end

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

that made me think for a moment (rare that) ... your wind load is putting the free edge of the standing leg into tension, no?  so you're looking at buckling of the panel attach flange, no?  how much effective skin (door panel) do you use ? door material ??

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

(OP)
To answer some of the posts:  I'm assuming that the other angles (except at the end) will block the wind, and the worst case is shown in the sketch, (although now that I think about it the wind could blow from behind at a similar but worse angle).  The stiffeners won't be welded.  This is a facade not a door.  

And the condition that controls (weak axis of L with load resolved into principal axis) is expressed by
Mn=3.14^2*E*Sc/(4*b/t)^2    <-- notice the denominator (4*b/t)^2
where Sc is the section modulus using the portion of the angle that is in compression only.  You can see that the b/t ratio hurts exponentially, and only being allowed to use the compression-only section hurts as well.

To re-state the condition, the angle is attached at 3 points spanning 11'6" vertically story to story, 30' total span including cantilever above and below, bolted to a support with the 2" leg.  

I want to know if there is research or other books that would specify the required depth or I of a stiffener.  ADM B.5.5.3, Fig B.5.5 specifies a stiffener required based on the flexural stress in the member it is stiffening.

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

The only place I know of is the AISI code for light-gauge.  In the 2007 edition in Chapter B4 there is an equation for the required I for a stiffener so that the element can be treated as stiffened.

I am not sure that this would apply for aluminum, but it is the only thing I could find.

It is Ia = 399t^4[(w/t)/S - 0.328]^2 is less than or equal to t^4[115(w/t)/S + 5]

t= thickness of section
w= flat dimension of element
S= 1.28SQRT(E/f)
f= stress in compression flange

 

RE: Aluminum Beam - Minimum web stiffener depth, local buckling

ah, so the pic was right as drawn ... the stiffeners are on the windward side ... won't there be some lateral loading, some torsion induced in the stiffener ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources