Classic Mini radius arms
Classic Mini radius arms
(OP)
Hi
I have a classic Mini with a B16 Honda VTEC engine fitted. Needless to say, this has altered the weight distribution, from an approx. 58:42 to 62.5:37.5 front to rear. I have, after much trial and error, got the front suspension to behave acceptably using coilover units, but the rear has me a bit baffled. I am using standard Moulton rubber cones, and with a 360lb cornerweight (gross), the rear suspension is extremely stiff.
Problem 1 is that I cannot find any information on the spring rate for the rubber cones. Added to the problem is that they're progressive not linear.
Problem 2 is that the suspension leverage figure is huge (if my understanding is correct). The rubber cone is compressed via a knuckle and solid bar from a lug underneath the radius arm, 40mm below the radius arm pivot point. The radius arm stub axle / pivot point centre-to-centre is 300mm - see attached image. To me, this gives a very large leverage (SL) figure of 7.5, which squared gives 56.25. Is this understanding correct ?
Using damper travel of 5" - this is also the wheel travel figure if the full range is used - the cone gets compressed 3/4".
Problem 3 is; how can I determine the spring rate of the rubber cone? Could I compress it using a hydraulic press fitted with a force/pressure gauge, measuring force every 5mm perhaps. I would like to know the spring rate in order that I can work out how to make the rear less stiff.
I have a classic Mini with a B16 Honda VTEC engine fitted. Needless to say, this has altered the weight distribution, from an approx. 58:42 to 62.5:37.5 front to rear. I have, after much trial and error, got the front suspension to behave acceptably using coilover units, but the rear has me a bit baffled. I am using standard Moulton rubber cones, and with a 360lb cornerweight (gross), the rear suspension is extremely stiff.
Problem 1 is that I cannot find any information on the spring rate for the rubber cones. Added to the problem is that they're progressive not linear.
Problem 2 is that the suspension leverage figure is huge (if my understanding is correct). The rubber cone is compressed via a knuckle and solid bar from a lug underneath the radius arm, 40mm below the radius arm pivot point. The radius arm stub axle / pivot point centre-to-centre is 300mm - see attached image. To me, this gives a very large leverage (SL) figure of 7.5, which squared gives 56.25. Is this understanding correct ?
Using damper travel of 5" - this is also the wheel travel figure if the full range is used - the cone gets compressed 3/4".
Problem 3 is; how can I determine the spring rate of the rubber cone? Could I compress it using a hydraulic press fitted with a force/pressure gauge, measuring force every 5mm perhaps. I would like to know the spring rate in order that I can work out how to make the rear less stiff.





RE: Classic Mini radius arms
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: Classic Mini radius arms
RE: Classic Mini radius arms
Alternate, adjustable suspension setups are readily available here in the US and from multiple sources in the UK. Why re invent the wheel? Several Honda conversions are about. I've seen several that are quite well done. Some even utilizing the stock suspension! In the UK, you can perhaps get a copy of the February, 2006 "MINI Magazine" that includes possibly the most definitive Honda conversion I've ever seen.
Rod
RE: Classic Mini radius arms
The D series Honda engine and gear box is considerably lighter (and cheaper) than the B series vtecs. They should make an easier conversion for a Mini, allowing the use of the original suspension..
Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
RE: Classic Mini radius arms
A colleague has a standard Mini and you can compress the rear by hand, so thought I should revert back - it is better but not much better however, certainly not as soft as his car. I don't understand, as I was under the impression that new rubber cones gave a better ride than old ones !!
RE: Classic Mini radius arms
RE: Classic Mini radius arms
RE: Classic Mini radius arms
My race Mini, ~1400 empty and 1700 all up race ready with me in the seat (225lb.) it has 490 on each front and 360 on each rear. Stock (very old and hard) cones, GAZ and 1/2" rear bar. Yup...it's stiff but not all that far off of a few street vintage Minis I've driven.
Like I mentioned, the Honda conversions are quite popular and I've seen several. We even have a rear engined version about. I've heard no complaints about being too stiffly sprung. Perhaps you should get in touch with Don Racine of Mini Mania here in the U.S. as he does these conversions on a regular basis. On your side of the pond...I just cannot imagine that you can't find knowledgeable Mini gurus. Nick Swift, Keith Calver, etc. I've done business with them and they get a thumbs up from me.
Rod
RE: Classic Mini radius arms
''The stock style cones come in a couple varieties...stiff and very stiff''
I remember them acting as automatic cigarette ash tippers too, the ashtray becoming your lap or floor!
BG