×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Trouble modeling geodesic dome

Trouble modeling geodesic dome

Trouble modeling geodesic dome

(OP)
I am having difficulty mating parts to create a geodesic dome model.  Due to the spherical nature of the dome, the lengths of the struts used to construct individual triangles cannot be fully described by a decimal number (irrational).  I am therefore forced to use distance mates on some occasions and I have to arbitrarily choose a 'close enough' distance.  Is there a way to mate 'as close as possible' or some other way of accomplishing this?  Also is there an equivalent for angle mates?

Thanks Everyone
-Skar81  

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

Can you show images of the typical joint style you are working with?

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

(OP)
First I modeled with planes so I could find my swing and bevel angles for the true model.  The irrational distance values obviously apply to the sides of the planes but I'm afraid of completing the true 3d model before I resolve the mating issue.  (Only the parts assembled were needed to find all the pertinent angles)

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

SKAR81,

   How you model a geodesic dome depends massively on why you are modeling it.  SolidWorks does an excellent job of modeling confusion and stupidity.  If the cut is difficult for you in SolidWorks, it will be difficult for the carpenter or welder or whoever.

   My first thought about geodesic domes in general is that they are space frames.  Space frames are ideal for maximizing access for everything in and out of the frame.  This goes for you, your hands, your tools, your family, your personal belongings, rain and snow, burglars, the police, damn foreigners, animals, etc.  Space frames make great jungle gyms.  As shelter, a complex space frame is a way to maximize the number of seams you have to seal, somehow.  A good rule for any kind of structural enclosure is that you design your covers first, then figure out the structure underneath.

   Do you have to hit the diameter bang on, or you can you design a standard triangle section with rational dimensions, and hit the "diameter" approximately?

   If you can design a standard connecting bracket, you can connect square cut, standard lengths of lumber, extrusion or other structural sections.  

   A good trick with complex frames is to create a structure shaped "blob".  Make it transparent.  Set the material density as  low as you can.  I use 0.1kg/m^3.  I wish SolidWorks took into account figments of people's imaginations.  

   Model the blob to the outside shape that you want.  Add in functional details like doors, windows, access panels, etc.  Locate your geodesic pieces to the blob.  

   Load your blob into Custom Properties.  There is a click-box that will exclude it from your bill of materials.

   Your triangle section is interesting.  You are aware of course that the sides of your lumber cannot be perpendicular to the faces.  You might be able to do this with a table saw or circular saw, but you will need some sort of jigging procedure to make up for tolerance stack-up.

               JHG

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

(OP)
Thanks for the input drawoh.  Some triangles have already been made and the concept has been proven in a scale model.  What I really want to do is create a cad model.  Even if I adjusted the diameter there would still be irrational numbers as each vertex points directly to the center of the sphere; hence a triple miter cut on each end of a strut.  What I need to find is if it is possible to have solidworks define a "closest possible" mate or perhaps change the resolution of the entire model so that one thousandth of a unit is considered exact.

Thanks

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

I've used "close" within 0.010 mates when laying out (for instance) a fixed-centerline belt/pulley arrangement at some angle to an axis as compared to x-y decimal coordinates of the shaft centerlines for the pulley locations themselves.
It works fine and allows for metric/English units if need be.
(For instance, the belts/pulleys might be metric, but the pulley shaft centerlines, etc might be better to remain in English units)
I've also used this for Chains/Sprockets because the dimensions often don't come out to the nearest common decimal, but yet, the accumulated link(s) dimensions must be held.

If the triangle shape & dimensions present problems with mating; applying the "close to" modified mate to the geodesic form might be the way to go....as long as there aren't any further "stack-up" problems.

 

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

OK.  I'm still confused.  You want to model a geodesic dome.  I got that much.  Are you saying that you have an existing wooden triangle frame (shown in your pic above) that you want to stack up into an assembly?

Dan

www.eltronresearch.com
Dan's Blog

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

Model as multi-body solid relying on geometry and very few dimensions needed - no calculations needed.  SolidWorks will calculate the geometric solution out to as many decimal places as it uses.
Push the solid bodies out to assembly and Fix.

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

Would it be possible to model the framework as a weldment, and use the trim feature to add the triple miter cut to each strut?

Joe
SW Office 2008 SP5.0
P4 3.0Ghz 3GB
ATI FireGL X1

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

SKAR81,

   The relationship between diameter and any linear measurement around a circle or sphere, is an irrational number.  You are going to have a round-off error.

   How accurate is your carpentery?  ±1/16"?  I can set my circular saw at home to within one degree.  I suppose a good table saw can do somewhat better.  All of these tolerances will accumulate as you add pieces to quite a substantial error.  You are going to need some sort of surveying and jigging process.

   Your round-off error is trivial.

               JHG

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

I think the problem the OP is facing is properly constraining a bunch of parts that aren't exact (just like the real world) and therefore tolerance stack-ups cause problems with SWx exact assembly constraints.

The solution is to model as multibody (and/or skeletal modeling techniques) and forget assembly constaints altogether (not needed).

RE: Trouble modeling geodesic dome

rollupswx,

   I think that modeling in SolidWorks is fairly easy.  Define a centre axis.  Insert the first element of each row.  Create a circular array for the row.

   Assembly of this thing is going to be a challenge.   

               JHG

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources