×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Concentrated Load Equivalents
3

Concentrated Load Equivalents

Concentrated Load Equivalents

(OP)
  I have a project that includes OWSJ's at 4' o.c. supported on a 30 foot W section.  The layout is seven joists, evenly spaced.  Load per joist is the same, so it's symetrical.  My concern is the design of the W section beam.
  On small stuff, I like to do the calcs by hand, however the deflection on this one gets a little hairy, so I used STAAD.  I know about Table 3-22a in the Steel Manual, but that only goes to four loads per span.
  Has anyone developed a rule of thumb where they assume uniform loading if there are so many concentrated loads?  The difference between concentrated and uniform diminishes as the number of concentrated loads per span goes up.

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

The steel joist table should list the maximum resisting moment for any span for the joist.  Just figure out the moment and make sure it is less than that.  I assume the joist manufacturer can supply the joist to suppport the five or seven interior panel point loading configurations (Is it possible that two of the joists are over columns at the ends of the girder?)

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

I think the assumption of uniform load is universal.  It is overkill to use a program like STAAD to check the deflection of a simple span beam.

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

Agree with hokie on both points.

Although if you wanted to check the deflection with your seven point loads, you could outsmart the manual and its limited tables by using superposition.  Calculate the centerline deflection under each of your seven load and add them all up.  I bet this is pretty close to your uniform load deflection.

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

We almost never use concentrated loads on WF beams to model joist loads.  The difference is very negligible in the resulting designs.

 

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

The moments and deflection go down to only a few percent above udl at about 6 or so point loads. I used to have a good chart that mapped these and I will see if I can find it.

Remember that in these situations even if you had a central point load you would usually only have half the udl in that point load.

If this is the case P=wL/2 and M=(wL/2)*L/4 = wL^2/8

As deflection is proportionate to the area under the moment diagram then the deflection in this case would be less than for the udl.

2 to 6 point loads are a bit more complex but also have a reduced load which helps keep the moment down closer to the udl.

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

I would absolutely use the UDL on the beam, but the OP leads to some wool gathering on my part. From my archives, the following general cases:

Beam divided into n parts, for n-1 loads P. There are different formulas for even and odd divisions. The first part is the same for both:

CF=PL^3/192EI

When n is odd; dmax=CF.[1-1/n][3-(1-1/n^2)/2]

When n is even; dmax=CF.n[3-(1+4/n^2)/2]

 

Michael.
Timing has a lot to do with the outcome of a rain dance.

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

The moment diagram for the concentrated loads touches the uniform load parabola at every joist.  Using uniform load for moment calculation contains no error.  It is theoretically accurate, even for a single joist at midspan.

Deflection is overestimated when "smearing" the point loads to uniform.  The moment curve for the uniform load case is outside the point load moment curve between adjacent loads.  This means using uniform load is always conservative.

The error can easily be found using moment-area principles.  Between adjacent joists, a uniform load would produce a moment of wa2/8 where a is the joist spacing.  The area under that moment curve is:
A = 2/3(wa2/8)a = wa3/12

If beam is divided into n parts, then if n is even, there are n/2 areas of A each side of midspan.  

Error in using UDL for deflection = (n/2)(A/EI)(L/4) =  wL4/(96n2EI)

If n = 8, Error = 0.0125 or 1.25%
   n = 6, Error = 0.0222 or 2.22%
   n = 4, Error = 0.05   or 5.0%
 
The case of odd n is not included here.

Using a uniform load instead of point loads results in no error for moment calculation, but a slight overestimate for deflection calcs.  

BA

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

OK Guys:

Take a 12 foot span beam with five 1K loads 2 feet apart on the beam.

Considering the point loads, the moment is 9K'.
1(2 + 4) + 1(12)/4 = 9 K'

But considering the 5K load spread over the 12 foot span, the moment is 7.5 K'.   .4167(12)^2/8 = 7.5 K'

That's a 20% difference.  You can't make the blanket statement that a uniform load would be the same.  It's not necessarily true.
Maybe for longer spans wqith a lot of point loads, but not short ones with a few loads.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

If you're going to be that precise, shouldn't you spread the 5k load over 10 feet and then compare?

I personally use UDL over the full length, but the UDL is calculated using the girder's full tributary area width.  I know it's a little overkill, but I've almost always done it this way.

tg

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

msquared, you should be comparing your 9 kip-ft moment to that produced by 6 point loads (half of each joist reaction at the columns).  (0.5 k/ft)(12 ft)^2/8 = 9 kip-ft

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

I agree with nutte.  1000# at 2' o/c is equivalent to w = 500#/'.  

BA

RE: Concentrated Load Equivalents

OK.  I thought the load was being applied a different way.  

The moment and shear will be conservative with the uniform load at .5 klf applied across the entire length of the beam.   

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources