×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wind : Importance Factor

Wind : Importance Factor

Wind : Importance Factor

(OP)
Does a rooftop unit, mounted on a building with Importance Factor of 1.15, be also designed for I = 1.15 or can it be lowered to 1.0?  

RE: Wind : Importance Factor

IMHO, you need the same importance factor for the rooftop equipment as the building.

RE: Wind : Importance Factor

Same here.

RE: Wind : Importance Factor

Maybe you could get away with 1.0 if the OC III was based on occupant load and RTU is not over occupied space.

Or if the OC is based on hazardous materials and the unit's failure wouldn't be detrimental to the facility.

These are stretches though that I might use to justify something existing.  

RE: Wind : Importance Factor

Ditto....importance factor applies to the whole design.

As an example...all school facilities in Florida must have 1.15 factor applied.  I design a lot of canopies for schools...1.15 applies for those, yet they do not usually impact the main structure.

If you have an AC unit on the roof and the building stands at the design pressure but the rooftop unit flies off and goes through one of the walls because it was designed at 15% less, well.....

RE: Wind : Importance Factor

(OP)
Copy that. smile

RE: Wind : Importance Factor

Ditto Ron.

RE: Wind : Importance Factor

In my opinion,it should be designed to the same importance factor unless you can prove that its failure will not compromise the building envelope or the integrity of the building.

Very difficult to do but it may be possible where the failure criterion is more serviceability than structural failure.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources