×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Root Pass Examination
3

Root Pass Examination

Root Pass Examination

(OP)
We have to butt weld a 2 1/2 NPS Sch 80 pipe with a valve. Our NDE person wants to have radiographic examination after the root pass. He would then allow us to proceed with filler passes and finally with capping passes. After that he will examine by radiographic examination and dye penetrant examination.
Is he following the right path. We believe that radiographic examination after the root pass is not required by ASME Section III. Are we right?

RE: Root Pass Examination

Better to post in ASME forum but don't double post- click Inappropriate post? or post a link to the new thread. If you have already posted in ASME (mechanical) code please correct this thread.   

RE: Root Pass Examination

Nothing in Section IX or V that requires RT [or any NDE] examination after completing the root pass.  My recommendation would be to perfom an MPI examination of the root pass using dry particles if you are concerned with root cracking.  RT is overkill for this application (examination of root)and you have a good chance of missing a smaller crack anyway. Also, unless you re-apply the preheat after RT, your chance of cracking dramatically increases due to root bead contraction.

RT can be performed on the final weld and a wet MPI method, like white contrast can be performed as well if you desire.  It is more sensitive that PT and easier to clean.

 

RE: Root Pass Examination

Root pass RT is not required by Code, only final NDT. Do I think your NDT examiner is on the right path? Yes, if they want to ensure weld quality weed out poor welders in production.  

RE: Root Pass Examination

On a 2 1/2" pipe butt weld, it is far more cost effective to RT only after weld completion. You should visually examine the root ID surface for full penetration/contour before completeing the root if you have reason to suspect the ability of the welder. If your NDE guy is a subcontractor, he is simply trying to obtain additional money for his service.    

RE: Root Pass Examination

Your NDE guy is "right" in that you "can" do all that, but he is wrong in requiring it.  For a small 2-1/2 inch pipe that thin (only Sch 80) on a simple butt weld, his choice is not only overkill, but he is telling you to shoot it again and cut off its head, then tie the carcass up so it won't run away.   

Agree with the above:  If VT on the root, PT (dye penetrant) if you want a check against porosity.  Then RT the final pass.

We did 50% RT checks of 4200 psi piping when the pipe walls were over 4 inches thick, and then repeated the RT when the final weld was finished, but never for simple then-walled Sch 80.    

RE: Root Pass Examination

Radiography of the root pass may not be required of ASME but a specification or a condition in the contract may dictate this inspection and/or spot radiography. The contract will rule and your NDE guy may not be wrong. Clear expectations must be documented.

Review the requirements/contract with the NDE guy and the customer to understand the rational to RT the root. Maybe he had mistaken a R (RT) for P (PT) because drawings were not clear or smudged.


btw, I like the idea of spot radiography. It keeps everyone at their best performance. The downfall is $.

Regards,
Van

RE: Root Pass Examination

(OP)
Thank you very much for all the good advice.

RE: Root Pass Examination

2
Reasons against RT of root passes,

1: RT of a root pass doesn't show very much.   Not all RT technicians are able to produce a good picture.
2: The film density has to be low to prevent burning out any relevant indications.  
3: On some materials it is best to maintain preheat during welding.  
4: On a small weld it is usually cheaper to cutout and reweld if there is any doubt
5: Costs time and money.
 

RE: Root Pass Examination

Unclesyd, the above is an excellent summary of reasons against radiography of a root pass.
Regards
Van

 

RE: Root Pass Examination

UncleSyd is right.  The density difference alone makes the shot and the interpretation difficult.  Could be a waste of time, effort and money.

RE: Root Pass Examination

UncleSyd hit everything except how fragile just a root-pass is.  For shop work, the strength of only a root is adequate.  For a fieldweld, it is foolish to stop the welder until he has completed the root and 'hotpass' second layer.

If your welders have such a poor success rate that intermediate RT on fairly thin pipe [less than 3/4" thick] is economically justified, get new welders.  Economic justification is easy;  compare the cost of RT of 50 or 100% intermediate with your historic cost of repair of RT rejects found at Final RT.  Bet your young QC inspector what the outcome will be.  Enjoy your winnings.

RE: Root Pass Examination

(OP)
Thanks again.

RE: Root Pass Examination

Calling for RT on a root-welded only 2 1/2 OD 7mm thick weld??? Forget replacing the welders - replace your ndeguy! NB I am aware of the irony!!!

RE: Root Pass Examination

Should consider the options - access to VT the ID is only possible with a borescope or similar. This should be 1st choice to check  for lack of penetration / undercut immediately after welding in the root (lack of fusion will most probably not be detectable by VT) if root welder is "suspect". The OD side of the root can be checked by dry powder MPI for cracking.

Now what type RT of the root - X-ray or isotope, quite a significant difference in image quality (especially if your  isotope is Iridium which is certainly not suitable for 2mm thick metal(reasonable image quality only for 15mm w.t. and upwards due to "hardness" of the radiation). Also if using an isotope what size is the pill - the root only exposure conditions together with a large isotope will destroy any chance of good quality graphs.

Placing of the film - film ID and single wall X-ray will give the best image of the root and any LOF or LOP but will require multiple exposures due to density differences between middle and outer edges of interpretable graph area. The worst image will be from Double wall superimposed or Double wall double image of root-only (standard for completed welds of this OD) unless the film can be manipulated into close contact with the top of the root (a cut film will help).

So just on the options for producing reasonable quality graphs to justify the expense if the root welder is highly suspect, well this is a non-starter. Ask the NDE person to produce RT technique technique sheets for his proposal for root-only and for completed weld!

 

RE: Root Pass Examination

NDE GUY, I agree with your recommendations on inspection techniques for a root inspection.

X-ray should obtain favourable results. However, I do not know how convienient or possible it would be to use a X-ray unit in the field in a very tight spot and where accessiblity is an issue.  

Any experience with Cesium sources on thin material such as a root pass?

Regards,
Van  

RE: Root Pass Examination

X-ray will require a 75 - 100 foot exclusion zone around the weld point for about 3 hours: 2 hour setup, 1 hour for the shots and checking, plus a little bit for the removal.  

Now repeat for the second exclusion zone when the welder finishes the cover passes.  This thin a pipe wall, probably 3 circles does the whole weld.)

A little bitty weld like the one described takes less than two hours to finish the whole thing (fitting, root and cover pass, final pass.)

Can your NDE guy claim he/she is finding enough flaws in the root weld to justify 3 times the weld time to do (unneeded) NDE not called for by the Code?    

RE: Root Pass Examination

racookepe1978,
I am not sure if you have some outrageous radiation safety laws in the US or if the times you have quoted are a bit exaggerated.
Why would the exclusion zone have to be set up if the x-ray set has not been switched on or the gamma source has not been wound out ?
It is a requirement by law in New Zealand / Australia (and I presume the rest of the world) for gamma radiography to be performed by a two man team.
If I/we were not walking away from a 2 1/2" weld in 30-40 minutes (including set-up / shooting and then dismantling) my boss would be looking for two different technicians.
Total time for x-ray would be slightly longer due to setting up difficulties but still no longer than 1 hour.
Regards,
Kiwi   

RE: Root Pass Examination

My regulations require a exclusion, barricaded, signed roped of zone  set up at 10 mr/hr.  This needs to be set up prior and during the shot. I am not sure if it is regulation that it is a two man team (it has been awhile since I have been in the regs) however, internal procedures and good practices dictate 2 radiographers minimum in addition to the barricaded exclusion zone.

It concerns me to hear of the production pressures out there especially in far away lands.  This leads to errors, fatigue and potential over exposures (including the loss of extremities and loss of life) in the rush to get the job done.  Play safe it is your radiography license, your livehood, your safety and the safety of the public.  PLEASE PLEASE play safe!

RE: Root Pass Examination

(OP)
Having read all good advices, my NDE person now wants another advice. Is it good or worth full to do surface examination at root pass. Please comment.  

RE: Root Pass Examination

vanmorrison...probably wouldn't use Cesium 137.  The root pass examination would require detail, and the shot geometry probably wouldn't be amenable to the larger Cesium source needed. A panoramic shot couldn't likely be done, so you'd have to resort to 4 elliptical shots.  

A lot of effort that would be better spent with detailed visual/MT.

RE: Root Pass Examination

Its not usual on plain carbon steels if your QC programme is in control of your fabrication facility. If not, then you have to take special steps to cover for possible defective workmanship and this should include  some  root pass dry powder MPI inspection combined with borescope of the internal until you are certain your fabricatio proces is back under yuor control. But, as I am certain you are now convinced safiamoiz, volumetric (i.e. RT) inspection when there is hardly any volume of weld to inspect is a waste of time and money.

RE: Root Pass Examination

I would stick to a root pass VT only.  

Root pass surface exam on most smallbore is just an additional waste of time and money, and you'll still have a difficult time picking up anything other than a gross discontinuity.  A small amount of IP, porosity, etc, isn't going to show with a dry mag, and even if you think you're "good to go", you still risk further defects such as excessive suck back and burn through after the hot pass anyways.

If they're using GTAW, the welder could have probably finished that joint out by the time the NDE tech got there.  If using SMAW, he probably could have finished before they even got him over the radio.

I'm a firm believer that if there is such a concern over the adequacy of root pass welds on smallbore pipe, especially if dealing with carbon steel or low alloy, then you've likely got a significant deficiency in either your fit-up inspections, welder testing, or a combination of both.  

RE: Root Pass Examination

vanmorrison,
My apologies, I did not explain properly.
I was neither suggesting or condoning safety being compromised in pursuit of speed.
Purely trying to show that the time posted (3 hours) for 1 x 2 1/2" weld was way over the top.
An example -
5 mins to unload truck,
10-15 minutes for one tech to set up shot while the other tech is putting up the barricade / signs.
1-3 minutes per shot dependant on source strength.
2 minutes to change films and reposition source.
Total of 5 minutes max per shot.
3 shots x elliptical or 4 shots x superimposed.
10-15 minutes to pack up gear.
That is 55 minutes maximum or 28 minutes minumum depending on variables.
As stated x-ray will take longer to set-up.
We do that numerous times daily (generally faster, I have been conservative)without ever compromising safety,
Regards,
Kiwi

RE: Root Pass Examination

Safiamoiz,

In your original post you reference ASME Section III. So am I correct to assume this valve installation is to be done in accordance to ASME?   What does the reviewed and approved I & TP specify for the inspection requirements?  Or is the I & TP still in the development and review process?

Kiwi, I am glad to hear that your safety is not being compromised.  

RE: Root Pass Examination

My experience in X-rays is in multi-level power plants where the exclusion barrier has to be "up"  and inspected by the shift leaders for the other work crews, the plant operators, and the plant control room staff before the plant operators can allow the radioactive material to be off-loaded from the truck.  

Your times are probably right for a "open site" new construction job with no other crews working, but that's not a refinery or power plant where you've got to wait until after midnight to minimize interferences.   (Also, my experience also probably includes multiple shots for the final RT of a larger, higher-pressure pipe, but that's what's normally the case.)  

Thanks for the input.    

RE: Root Pass Examination

safia,

At the very most I would say perform a PT on the root pass if you or someone else needs additional verification beyond visual.  I agree with everyone else that RT on a small (schd. 80 wall thickness) root pass is highly unusual, and also not needed as per code (ASME IX, and poss. B31.1).  RT on the full weld, absolutely, but anything beyond PT on the root pass in my opinion is a waste of time.

RE: Root Pass Examination

I would like to know WHY did the nde guy suggest NDT on the root pass alone before progressing with welding. How was the root quality suspect?

RE: Root Pass Examination

(OP)
The NDE guy says that it is a industry good practice.

RE: Root Pass Examination

No offense, but exactly when is it industry good practice according to your NDE guy?  Is it when you don't trust the welder enough to make a small root pass?  Or is it when you can't find any requirements anywhere stating need for RT in the first place and try to take advantage of the situation by saying that RT "will catch any flaws that could be inclusive and can't be found by other methods" (I've actually had an RT guy try saying this to me, and when I said "what about UT?", he froze).

Personally, it sounds to me like your NDE guy is trying to drum up more business for himself at the expense of your scheduleand budget.

Unless it is specifically called out in the project specifications or required by ASME, I would not go for it.  Follow everyone else's advice on here, stick with VT, or if it's really that important drum it up to either PT or MT.  Save the RT until the final weld is completed (if required).

RE: Root Pass Examination

Hahaha - good practice of his money-making industry! Gone are the days when the nuclear industry had money to burn, I think.

RE: Root Pass Examination

Just because they don't have it doesn't mean they won't still burn it!

RE: Root Pass Examination

Plus ca change...! I suppose why should they give up their beautiful art of burning other peoples (taxpayers, chiefly) money!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources