×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Changing recommendations in report to suit client
8

Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Changing recommendations in report to suit client

(OP)
Ok, so I wrote a report on a system, providing a summary of the data from our inspections and then recommendations for repair or replacement.

My boss reviewed the report and told me to change a number of my recommendations.  His reasoning was, "The client won't like what you've proposed.  They normally just replace the component instead of repair it when adjacent components are to be replaced.  Change your recommendations."

I felt uncomfortable with the changes because the data from our inspections did not support a replacement of this component, only replacement of the adjacent components.  As a precaution, I recommended a new coating on all components - but not replacement.  My report clearly stated this and provided support from the data our field inspection crew obtained.  The inspection data was also included in the report as an appendix.

I made the changes as requested but I approached my boss, explaining that I did not agree with the change in recommendations from that which I had proposed.  Therefore, I asked if I could put his name on the report instead of mine.  He agreed and appeared somewhat surprised at my request.

The problem is that now I have reason to believe he is unhappy with my choice of actions.  I am worried about the possible repercussions but I feel I couldn't ethically sign a report for recommendations that I did not agree.

Am I making a big deal out of nothing?  Should I stand firm?  Or is tailoring recommendations based on client preferences a common occurrence?

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

3
In that replacing is a more conservative option for you and your firm, I do not see the problem .

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

I agree too with your boss, in this case and for the reason Mike indicated. I would have taken time to understand where your boss was coming from.  Yes, actions like one you took are seldom looked up on favorably.

It is always better to go in with conservative option and let the Owner decide what he wants to give up in order to save money.

Rafiq Bulsara
http://www.srengineersct.com

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Quote:

"The client won't like what you've proposed.  They normally just replace the component instead of repair it when adjacent components are to be replaced.  Change your recommendations."
This sounds like a very valid comment to me.
If you found no real problems and he wanted to replace everything then there might be concerns about padding the bills.
But you say adjacent components are to be replaced. It would be a shame if later the un-replaced component were to fail.
How many times when you work on your car do you replace just one belt and not them all?
Client confidence is important.
The client could genuinely be concerned that not replacing one component when a lot of others are to be replaced will be a false economy.
If you wanted to replace a lot of components on safety grounds and the boss wouldn't let you or the client wouldn't pay for that, you have a situation.  

JMW
www.ViscoAnalyser.com

 

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Technically conservative is not the same as financially conservative.  Did your recommendation consider the cost of down time?

Without context it's difficult to judge.

In general however, writing a report that states only what the client wants to hear, or justifying existing practices without cause is in poor taste.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

(OP)
My biggest concern was the reasoning for why the changes to my report were being made.

It was soley because my boss felt the client would not look favorably on my recommendations.  No other reasons were given.

So, I was then in the position where I had to write a report that gave data which showed a component in good structural condition, good operational condition, gave good performance, and showed no signs of deterioration at all.  Yet, my recommendations would have been for replacement.  

I couldn't support the recommendations based on the data at hand.

Perhaps my approach to the overall problem with my boss' direction wasn't the best but I really felt like I was between a rock and a hard place.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

(OP)
Oh, and the only reason we were replacing adjacent components is because they no longer met the "latest" standards.  They were in fine condition as well but were slightly undersized - again, per the client's most recent design standards.  

From a technical standpoint, the system was/is working fine.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

How about rewording with something like:

"I beleive the components need only be cleaned and painted but consideration can be made for their replacement as this will/should prevent future maintainence issues and provide you with the latest upgrades."  or some BS like this.

Would that make you and your boss both happy??  BTW - it is not good to piss off your boss unless he is being totally unethical or dangerous....

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

3
The reason engineering firms have a review policy is usually twofold...one is for risk management and the other is for passing on the benefit of a more senior engineer's experience and judgment.  In your case, your boss knew immediately what the client wanted (he had experience with the client).  He asked you to change the report (judgment, backed up by experience).

You implied that you had superior knowledge, experience and intellect by disagreeing and then drawing a line in the sand to remove your name from the report.  You insulted your boss by not giving him the benefit of his experience and judgment WITH THIS CLIENT!

There are many considerations to make in such a decision.  Did you consider the potential downtime of a failure?  Did you consider life-cycle costs of the decision to repair?  Is there a difference in performance between the new replace parts and the potentially repaired parts?  Do you know the client's budgeting method (might have capital for replacement but no budget for repairs...they are often in separate buckets of money.)

The suggestion by MikeTheEngineer is one we often take in facility considerations....something to the effect of "Ideally, this section should be replaced; however, if your budget only allows repair at this time, then you can expect X years of effective useful life of the repaired section, compared to Y years of effective useful life for replacement."....or you can reverse the wording to highlight repair over replacement.

Based on your description, you were probably wrong to take the stand that you did.  You might want to discuss with your boss, the reasons he made the call and get the benefit of his experience.  No need to grovel, just be clear that you thought you had done the right thing, but upon further reflection you see his point (if you do).

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

(OP)
Thanks for all the responses.

Ron, your post hit it on the head, I think.  You make some great points and, upon reflection, I agree with what you've stated.  I think I may see what the intent was but, perhaps at the time, the communication wasn't as clear as it should have been.

I see now how my response was insulting.  Not trying to make excuses, but I often find it difficult to reconcile my desire to "take ownership" of my work with the need to learn from the experience and judgement of my superiors.  


I'll take some time to consider my next move and hopefully figure out how to approach my boss and make amends.
 

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Quote (Me):

The client pays me a lot of money for my recommendations.  They are free to follow them or not as they see fit.

"Tailoring" recommendations to fit within a known culture at a client is not uncommon.  That is different from making a recommendation that is not supported by the findings of an investigation.

It's too late now of course, but what you should have done was stress to your boss that your recommendation was based on the findings of the investigation that you were paid to do, and if the client doesn't agree with them they are not obligated to follow them.

 

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

There is a bunch of info missing here, but from what I read and presume, much of above I agree with, but Ron really nailed it.

There are commercial, political, marketing and technical reasons that influence real world actions.

You should never let anything overrule safety, but judgment on other aspects are certainly negotiable and much of the knowledge required to make those decisions might be not available to you or the ability to make good decisions in those regards might not yet be in your skills set.

Discuss it with your boss and seek guidance and mentoring in those regards.

I would start the conversation by just fessing up that you where only looking at it from a purely technical viewpoint, but have since realized there was a lot more involved and you would be interested in knowing more for future reference.

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
 

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

(OP)
Thanks again to everyone's insight.  I have decided to wait and see.  I learned that my boss is dealing with some personal issues, which may have explained his unhappy demeanor yesterday.  It could have been coincidence - he learned of this personal issue shortly before receiving my report.

So, I don't want to approach my boss with a perceived slight - only to learn that he didn't feel slighted in the least.

If I get any indications that my actions were, in fact, perceived as insulting or otherwise incorrect, I will certainly heed the advice I've read here.

Regardless, I will strive to seek more background information (polictical, commercial, financial, marketing, and technical) before taking a stand against a recommendation from a superior.

As a side, this board is great.  Thanks to all for their continued support and advice!

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

I would still take the initiative and aplogize to your boss rather than have him possibly approach you later.  Regardless of his problem, what you did was a challenge to his authority and needs to be rectified as soon as possible.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Clear the air. Everyone in the room probably thought they had a reasonable point of view and that the other was trying to overrule them.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

I have a very different take on than other people.

Suppose the context of the report is the client wants his insurance company to pay for the repairs to an expensive project (say it is an aerospace engine), and the insurance company is requiring a report to justify whether replacement or repair of the components is feasible.

As an engineer, you have determined that it is not necessary to replace certain components. Your engineering judgment is that one or more expensive components can be repaired and will provide satisfactory operating capability for the item.

The client disagrees, they were looking for an engineer to determine that everything needed to be replaced because they do not want to repair components. They are willing to shop the job around until they find an engineer that writes the report that you want.

I think this is very much a case of engineering ethics, and as a licensed professional, you have an obligation to the public, which would include the insurance company. In the situation I created above, it is your obligation to recommend replacing only those parts that are unrepairable and repairing those parts that are repairable and do not need to be replaced.

(As an aerospace engineer, it is very common that parts are repaired rather than replaced. There is one example where a large aerospace company did a major repair on an airplane that cost $200 million rather than scrap it out at the insistence of the insurance company. It was a bear of a repair but the airplane was returned to normal condition afterwards.)

Cedar Bluff Engineering
http://cedarbluffengineering.webs.com

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

photoengineer...you make a valid point; however, as a subordinate engineer, it was not his call to make.  It would have been better if he had inquired and gotten a full explanation of the reasoning behind the decision, rather than going off half-cocked about it.  If his judgment is indicated by his actions, then his boss was correct in doing what he did.

I do agree with your premise, though.  It happens all the time....unfortunately.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

(OP)
If his judgment is indicated by his actions, then his boss was correct in doing what he did.

Ron....Ouch.  I would like to think this was an example of poor communication on my part, rather than a direct reflection of my judgement.  Again, my motivation was to have the recommendations supported by the inspection data but my approach to the recommended changes by my supperior was wrong.

Photoengineer, to the best of my knowledge, an insurance company is not involved.  Although, a board of supervisors is involved, so the question very easily could come up, "Why is Engineer XYZ recommending replacement when the data said everything was in good condition?".  I hope the revised report has adequately anticipated (and properly answered) that question.

 

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

s0eebuch...sorry, but didn't intend that as a slam, just a reflection that your boss likely knows your experience and the project better than you and certainly better than all of us.

I "grew up" in engineering in a large firm that had a very well established review policy.  Only one designated to a certain level could be the final signatory on a technical report.  I used to argue my points with the Principal Engineer, then I became one...then the younger engineers would argue with me!  Nothing at all wrong with the process...it's a part of mentoring.  You just got a little miffed a bit quickly from your description and made a seemingly bad decision to ask that your name be removed rather than going through the process of learning the reasons.

Besides...you've already learned something from your actions and from your post.  Keep learning...I hope I always will.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

(OP)
Ron, no offense taken!    

To your second statement - I agree.  I did "jump the gun" a bit instead of slowing down and thinking through the reasons behind the suggestions.

And the decision to remove my name from the report was rash and insulting to my boss - I see that now.

Again, thanks to you (and everyone here) to all the advice.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Ron...Learn?  

Heck he still lives in Florida with all those Hurricanes, and ... Gators, and ... Water Moccassins, and ... Pythons!  I ain't talkin' football here either...

What value is his opinion?  bigsmile

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Hey Mike!  Not much...ask my wife!!lol

The only thing you guys up there have that I wish we had a little more of here is humidity!!  Don't want the gators, pythons, and water moccasins to dry out.  Sometimes 95 degrees and 95 percent rh just ain't enough!

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Have a good weekend Ron!

bigsmile.

Mike McCann
MMC Engineering
Motto:  KISS
Motivation:  Don't ask

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Thanks, Mike...you too.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

I can understand the clients attitude. If you have to have downtime anyway then you might as well replace all wearing parts in the vicinity.

As others have noted, the cost of downtime may far outweigh any of the costs that you are aware of.

We get this sort of thing in my industry quite often. If the factory costs 20% more to build then it is often worth it if the factory is up and running 6 months earlier.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

(OP)
Thanks again for all the responses.

Not to belabor the point, but the "components" to which I referred earlier are precast concrete manholes and the "adjacent components" are concrete sewer mains.

I wanted to present the issue as objectively as possible, so as to garner objective feedback from all, so I tried to keep descriptions vague.  In retrospect, more thoroughly describing the items probably didn't matter, considering the issue.

FYI

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Concrete manholes are expensive. I think that is why the city hired an engineer to do an analysis and determine whether it needed to be replaced.

While I may have taken a more diplomatic approach with my supervisor, I don't think that requiring replacement because the client would prefer to replace the manhole would make good sense.

An engineer could say that while the condition of the manhole indicated that it does not need to be replaced, the manhole could be replaced at the utility or contractors preference might be a way to meet in the middle.  

Cedar Bluff Engineering
http://cedarbluffengineering.webs.com

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

I think photoengineer's on the right track there, since (a) chances are the manholes are the same age as the adjacent pipes, and may not last through an entire life cycle of the pipes, (b)replacing adjacent pipes would require quite a bit of work on the manholes which may damage the connections as opposed to installation of new ones, and (c)If the repair includes road closure/ repair, you want to do everything you can to open it up as little as possible.

While the *condition* of the manholes may not warrant replacement, the surrounding activity and remaining service life may. It's your boss's call.

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

My recent experience with my last report has given me a new outlook on this question.  My last investigation report was heavily edited by the Client, a developer.  He purchased a building where the original developer/contractor defaulted and then skipped town.....to China.  

I won't bore everyone with all the details, but one change stands out above all others.  The developer wanted me to change my recommendations on the commercial storefront system that had been installed without the internal water diverters, leaving open gaps in the frames at all the joints.  The storefront frames leaked like a sieve during spray testing to the point where the stipulated time for the tests could not be achieved without flooding the building.  My recommendation, de-glaze the system and install the diverters.

The developer wanted me to put in my report that they had planned to install awnings, and therefore the windows would not be as prone to leaking and would not need to be repaired.  I refused citing the section of the code (Section 1403 of the CBC if interested). In California, this is not a gray area.  The code is very specific about weathertight or water-managed construction.

What shocked me is that my own boss wanted me to go along with the suggestion saying it was not big deal and would make the client happy so he would pay the bill.  I still refused and highlighted the code section for my boss.  I really don't know where things ended up, but kept a copy of my original report just in case.  I'm hoping the powers in charge came to their senses.

I made many revisions to that report that I did not entirely agree with and changed the conclusion to a meaningless paragraph of current business buzzwords (posted in the language and grammar forum).  But I think there are definitely times where you must stand by your principals.  How else do you keep your own integrity intact?

"Gorgeous hair is the best revenge."  Ivana Trump

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Cass

More to the point, how do you keep your license intact and how do you avoid losing your shirt in the ensuing law suit from shop operators when their business gets ruined and YOUR signature is on the document approving the code violations.  

Regards
Pat
See FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on use of eng-tips by professional engineers &
http://eng-tips.com/market.cfm
for site rules
 

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

Yes, Pat you are right.  I believe you can loose your professional license if you refuse to abide by the building code, at least without a variance.  At minimum it is a serious violation of ethics.

The Developer was concerned that conclusions and recommendations in my report, if left unaddressed in the redevelopment project, could be used as evidence in a lawsuit brought by future condo owners.  My response was that he should be more concerned about Consultants called as percipient witnesses walking in to court with their original recommendations and his own (the Developer's) handwritten changes to the report.  

As I said, the experience not only left a bad taste, but gave me a different perspective on what can happen with this issue.

"Gorgeous hair is the best revenge."  Ivana Trump

RE: Changing recommendations in report to suit client

casseopeia, I've found engineers w/out the license woefully lacking in the understanding of consequences for breaching laws and ethics.  I have not run into licensed engineers that take it cavalierly.  But they exist because some State Boards publish their infractions and disciplinary actions.

I've contacted State Boards on issues and learned quickly just how serious infractions are.  I'll walk away before I jeopardize my license.

Ultimately, I learned Professional Engineers bear the burden of policing themselves and there is little recourse and/or support from Boards because the buck is supposed to stop with you.  You are the Professional Engineer and no one should trump your professional opinion.  You are entitled to your professional opinion.  These statements and recent problems are why I am now requesting to be on equal footing with management on these issues.  I refuse to be labeled as insubordinate because I refuse to break the law or code of conduct.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources