ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
(OP)
Hi guys
I have a query regarding how to take the
number of sprinklers in operation.
The rules state:
15.4.3 The design area shall consist of
the most hydraulically demanding area
of 12 sprinklers, consisting of four
sprinklers on each of three branch lines.
If this is my arrangement, which will
be the most demanding?
consider all measurements as uniform:
x1----x2----x3----x4------|-----x5----x6----x7----x8
|
|
x9----x10----x11----x12---|---x13----x14----x15----x16
|
|
x17----x18----x19----x20--|--x21----x22----x23----x24
|
|
|
|
I have a query regarding how to take the
number of sprinklers in operation.
The rules state:
15.4.3 The design area shall consist of
the most hydraulically demanding area
of 12 sprinklers, consisting of four
sprinklers on each of three branch lines.
If this is my arrangement, which will
be the most demanding?
consider all measurements as uniform:
x1----x2----x3----x4------|-----x5----x6----x7----x8
|
|
x9----x10----x11----x12---|---x13----x14----x15----x16
|
|
x17----x18----x19----x20--|--x21----x22----x23----x24
|
|
|
|





RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
would i not have to take a full range? e.g 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12?
I'm confused
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
The assumed area of operation is a rectangle. There are rules for selecting the rectangle which say the dimension in line with the ranges should be not less than 1.2 times the square root of the remote area (if I remember correctly). This usually means 4 sprinklers from 3 different ranges arranged in the most remote way.
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
the reason i ask is because i have a riser on the main.
Will the riser have to be sized to accomodate all 8 sprinklers or only four sprinklers per branchline.
the riser will obviously be bigger if i have the take all 8 into operation as it needs to handle a higher flow?
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
Can you provide more information about how you are designing the system? Are you using a pipe scheduling method?
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
Why do you ask?
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
Which program are you using? Is is specifically for designing sprinkler systems in accordance with the procedure set out in NFPA 13?
Anyway to answer your latest question, I was curious if you were trying to design an ESFR sprinkler system by using 'pipe scheduling' as there is no assumed area of operation for 'pipe scheduling'. I don't think you can do ESFR sprinkler design using pipe scheduling though.
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
Interesting - all of the ESFR I have ever seen is gridded.. I suspect this is because it is more economical to have two smaller cross mains and smaller branches, than to have a tree type arrangement.
But its all been in large warehouses, and with a fire pump. If you don't mind me asking, why not gridded?
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
Sure can't. You don't use the density/area method, either.
From NFPA 13 2010 22.4.4.3 ESFR Method:
For ESFR sprinklers, the design area shall consist of the most hydraulically demanding area of 12 sprinklers, consisting of 4 sprinklers on each of three branchlines, unless other specific numbers of design sprinklers are required in other sections of this standard.
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
I also agree with pumpsnpipes in that most ESFR systems are grids as this tends to reduce the number of mains and also the size of the ranges. The ranges can be arranged at 90 degrees to the perlins and cliped to the underside of the perlins.
These days, there is calculation software which can generate a grid automatically so a grid is just as easy to design as a tree.
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
There is some politics behind this design and i've been asked to stick to a tree system.
Just out of curiousity, what were the range sizes on a grid system that was done by anyone?
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
Ask your estimator what he bid the job for, grid or tree. With 8 heads per line, and depending on the water, I would absolutely try to tree it first. Easier for your fitters to sling a big main down the center, than to hang two smaller mains, make the swing joint at the roof peak, and hit the primary and secondary dead on with the pre-fab pieces your fancy sprinkler design program magicked together.
That being said, the ability to do cost benefit analysis is what sets great designers apart from the rest.
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
"Just out of curiousity, what were the range sizes on a grid system that was done by anyone?"
Smallest ESFR grid I have managed was 2" branch lines w/4" mains. In my experience being able to use 2" is extremely rare.
The largest was 4" branch lines, three (3) 6" mains and 8" riser.
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
What if the fire occurs along a rack? A rack fire would be thin and long?
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
Yes, this is true, a fire could possibly be long and thin. I'm glad you asked this question. Unfortunately I get similar questions a lot and I'll try to give you a sensible answer.
It seems for people from other fields that the design process is tied up with their ego. They come up with their own 'brilliant' ideas and defend them with their own retoric as the design and their support for their ideas represent them. Sometimes these people can look at a designer faithfully following a standard and think this person must be lacking in tallent and confidence because they are not using their own ideas.
I would point out to my colleagues that designing life safety systems is different to designing other systems. We follow codes and standards because that's what works. We don't brain storm, and use our creativity to decide what the dimensions of the design fire are - other people have already done that for us.
NFPA 13 is one of the most thoroughly reviewed and researched documents in the world. The team that produced it is huge and varied. Not only does it work, but it's trusted. Governments and insurers know NFPA 13 and they trust it. They don't know me and they aren't about to trusting my ideas.
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
From memory I designed one once with range pipes 2 1/2" riser and primary main was 8" and float main 6".
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
I did a performance spec and preliminary hydraulic calcs for a tire warehouse once that was about the same size as SD2's (4" branches, 6"/8" mains.
The site loops was interesting. 12" with double lead-ins to each side of the header supplying the risers, with PIVs out away from the building, such that if there was a break it could be fed from either direction of the site loop. And oh yeah, redudant 250k gal tank and pump sets.
The head location rules for ESFR are brutal. For ventilation duct I went with a single plenum dropping straight through the roof, with sidewall diffusers.. No obstructions. I tell people you have to design the building around ESFR sprinklers, not the other way around..
RE: ESFR - HYDRAULIC DEMAND
Yes I know what you mean. I was temping for a consultant once and the duct designer was shocked when I told him he had to move his duct because I needed the space for ESFR sprinklers. He was sure that duct designers should be higher up the food chain than sprinkler designers.